@BadgerStew@TomTiffanyWI nickname is "Toxic Tom" for a reason. As a Wisconsin legislator before running for Congress, Tom Tiffany worked to significantly reduce the DNR's regulatory powers and wanted to make it easier to open mines in northern Wisconsin that he supposedly represents.
Consider this a public service announcement about an iconic @Brewers public service announcement.
If you, like @MarkTauscher65, are unfamiliar with the legendary Two-Fisted Slopper, here he is in all his glory, and as introduced to Tausch on @WildeAndTausch today:
Guys this isn’t difficult. The Watson contract was always going to be a lightning rod topic. Watson has never played more than 554 snaps in a season, averaging 510 per year. He’s never caught more than 41 balls or had more than 620 yards. He’s missed 20 games in 4 years. But anyone with a minuscule amount of ball knowledge and/or common sense can see that the Packers offense is incredibly better and more efficient with Watson on the field. The Packers were never going to let him walk and it was always going to take this type of deal to get the contract done. In order for it to pay off CLEARLY Watson is going to need to stay healthier than he’s been over 4 years. BUT with the low guaranteed money Green Bay has wisely left themselves outs if that doesn’t happen. The Packers are betting on Watson. I’d do the same. It’s a good bit of business for both sides and hopefully it pays off in a major way. Only time will tell.