Toomish

[C3 @C_3C_3]

Elon created $1 trillion of value.

Congress created $39 trillion of debt.

Elon’s wealth is not the problem…

[Burnie Senders @BurnieSendersX]

The collective's equality is more important than individual achievement, comrade ☭

[Jared Dillian @dailydirtnap]

I have many more issues with Ilhan Omar being worth $30 million than Elon being worth a trillion.

[Toomish @TomaTimothy]

@mistressdivy I may go to Mars someday?

[Toomish @TomaTimothy]

@CTVNews Really comrade?

[David Perez @DavidCan2002]

Applies to every single Canadian province

[Bad Hombre @Badhombre]

Every dollar Elon Musk has made is traceable. Every product sold, every service rendered, every government contract awarded, every share of stock bought or sold. It’s all on the record.

You, on the other hand, haven’t built a company, invented a product, or created anything people willingly pay for. You’ve spent the last 14 years collecting a $174,000 Senate salary.

Yet somehow you managed to buy a luxury D.C. condo, a $4 million Victorian mansion in Cambridge, and saw your net worth balloon by 150% to $12 million. Everyone knows where Musk’s money came from. The same can’t be said for yours.

[Toomish @TomaTimothy]

The virtuous are very upset about this

[Jessica @JessicaTetreau]

Is she actually lecturing us about rich people from the back of a limousine 🤣

[Toomish @TomaTimothy]

@GavinNewsom With a statement like, all I can conclude is that you are an idiot.

[wealthmoose @wealthmoose]

🚨🇨🇦 CTV gave Carney glowing coverage on his grocery announcement.

They didn’t mention:

📌 Canada is the only G20 nation in recession

📌 The dollar decline makes imported food permanently more expensive

📌 Every previous Liberal affordability announcement failed

📌 30% of journalist salaries are subsidized by the government they’re covering

This isn’t journalism.

It’s sponsored content without the disclaimer.

🇨🇦📉 #CdnPoli #Carney #MediaBias

[wealthmoose @wealthmoose]

Mark Carney says families spend $800/month on groceries.

4 steaks at Costco: $78

That’s ONE meal for a family of 4.

That’s 10% of his monthly estimate gone in one dinner.

The man who expenses gourmet meals to taxpayers

just told you what groceries cost.

He has no idea. 🇨🇦🥴 #CdnPoli #Carney #Groceries

[Toomish @TomaTimothy]

🤔

[Eric Trump @EricTrump]

LOL… This is amazing 🇺🇸

[wealthmoose @wealthmoose]

🇨🇦 Every Canadian should read this twice:

🇨🇦 Canada ranks —
🥇 1st in uranium
🥇 1st in potash
🥈 2nd in nickel
🥉 3rd in oil
🏅 5th in gold
💧 1st in freshwater

Countries start wars for LESS than this.

And somehow we are told we’re too poor to cut taxes, too broke to build homes, too weak to compete, too small to matter.

It took historic levels of incompetence and ideological sabotage to bury a country this blessed.

Imagine where Canada would be if we were actually allowed to win.

#cdnpoli #Canada #Future #Resources #Economy #Energy #Mining #Prosperity

[Mark Roseman @markroseman]

Worth repeating… in what kind of organization would this happen?

You go 18% over budget on overhead.

Nobody notices or says anything.

The next year you go 36% over budget on overhead.

Problem right? Nope.

The next year you go 55% over budget on overhead.

What's next?

[Toomish @TomaTimothy]

@markroseman This is exactly what we get with government run healthcare.

[Toomish @TomaTimothy]

This 👇

[Jas @keepontruckin78]

I just tried to get on a family doctor waitlist in BC and was sent an “intake form” that reads less like healthcare and more like onboarding into a disciplinary regime.

Let me walk you through how a clinic can quietly strip away your sense of rights and agency before you’ve even met a doctor.

First, the vibe: you’re not greeted as a person with needs. You’re treated as a potential problem to be controlled. The form opens with medical history, then rapidly shifts into a wall of clinic policies, “I Agree” checkboxes, and threats of termination.

You’re told “INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE ADDED TO WAITLIST,” which is wild when there’s a family doctor shortage. Miss a checkbox in this maze and you don’t even get the privilege of waiting. [1]

Then the consent pile-on starts.

You’re asked to consent to:

- PharmaNet access
- Care Connect access
- E‑messaging over explicitly “not secured” channels
- Doctors using “AI-assisted tools during consultation”

No explanation of what AI tools, what data they touch, where it goes, or whether you can say no without losing care. Just a checkbox: “I consent doctors utilize AI-assisted tools during consultation.”

That is not meaningful consent. That is “click accept on the EULA if you want a doctor.”

Now let’s talk recording and privacy.

The form says you “accept” that audio/video recording in public areas (like the waiting room) is not permitted and may lead to “discontinuation of the therapeutic relationship and termination from the practice.”

Then it goes further: any recording of your doctor or their staff in the exam room or virtual visit, “without her/their permission and/or knowledge,” may also lead to termination. If you *do* record with permission, you “must” give them a copy as part of your medical record.

So the clinic can document you in their systems, but your ability to document them is treated as a threat to be controlled, and potentially a reason to cut you off from care.

In an era of medical gaslighting, disability struggles, and patients needing their own record for self‑advocacy, that should set off alarms.

Then comes the termination section.

The clinic lists reasons it may end the physician‑patient relationship, including but not limited to:

- “Excessive use of outside walk-in clinics”
- “Routinely showing up late to appointments or missing appointments (even if no-show fees are paid)”
- “Significant breakdown in the physician-patient relationship, including irremediable differences in philosophy of care”
- “If the practice size is decreased/reduced for any reason”

And then the kicker: this list “is not exhaustive,” meaning they reserve the right to terminate you for other reasons they haven’t stated.

So you’re supposed to sign away your acceptance of a policy where:

They can drop you if you seek care elsewhere when you can’t get in.
They can drop you even if you pay their fees.
They can drop you over “philosophy of care” differences.
They can drop you whenever they feel like shrinking their panel.
And they explicitly reserve the right to add other reasons later.

All of this is presented as if it’s just normal admin housekeeping.

Meanwhile, you’re the one expected to be perfectly compliant: cancel 24 hours ahead or pay, arrive late and you may be penalized, use other providers “too much” and you risk being discharged.

This is what power imbalance looks like on paper.

It doesn’t *say*: “We will treat you with dignity, collaborate on decisions, and work through disagreements like adults.”

It says: “We will control the terms, keep our options open to discharge you, and you will accept that as a condition of getting on our list.”

And it’s all wrapped in that classic, soothing healthcare tone: “We appreciate your honesty,” “Thank you for your understanding,” “We respect your decisions…”

1/2

[Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸 @Tablesalt13]

😂😭 -- WOKE MELTDOWN in Canadian parliament

Conservative MP asks geneticist witness "What is a woman?"

and a total CIRCUS erupts

Gets accused of "offensive language" during "pride month"

[Mark Roseman @markroseman]

Public management of health care can work very well.

But it doesn't always.

Have a look at what's going on at BC's UPCCs.

It's not public or private management that makes the difference. It's good or bad management.

That must include effective independent oversight.

[Kat Kanada 🏴 @KatKanada_TM]

Hahahahaha.

Classic.