WhatWillYouDoWithoutYourFreedom

Wife, mom, gramma, artist, gardener, anti-communist and a Braveheart fan.

[WhatWillYouDoWithoutYourFreedom @Tomato4usFields]

@ConceptualJames Oh thanks, now the song is in my head on repeat.

[WhatWillYouDoWithoutYourFreedom @Tomato4usFields]

@timkaine Right, then you didn't show them the actual before and after map. Lobster anyone?

[Jeremy Boreing @JeremyDBoreing]

So many women on this platform be like:

[BelannF @BelannF]

Bill Maher couldn't help but laugh when this Liberal woman expressed her transformation from brainwashed to Motherhood.

The transformation is hilarious.

[WhatWillYouDoWithoutYourFreedom @Tomato4usFields]

@GovernorVA Right, just so long as we don't object while you govern as if the whole state is NOVA.

[Britta | NoSoup4Knowles @nosoup4knowles]

Tucker Carlson admits he uses "questions" as "attacks"

Tucker: Well, sure. I mean, you could pose attacks in the form of questions. I've certainly done that a lot. Um, for sure.

[Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV) @TheMilkBarTV]

Tucker Carlson CAUGHT FLAT-OUT LYING about calling Trump "the Antichrist" on his show.

[Britta | NoSoup4Knowles @nosoup4knowles]

Tucker claims the words "could this be the antichrist?" never left his lips. NYT shows a clip of him saying exactly that:

[Defiant L’s @DefiantLs]

Bill Maher: "Democrats seem to be afraid of everything"

[The Vigilant Fox 🦊 @VigilantFox]

Bill Maher’s audience laughs as he’s forced to remind liberals “you’re not a good person” if you want Trump killed.

“He’s not Hitler!”

“I would just like to say, if you… watched that and were disappointed the president wasn’t killed…”

[Audience laughs]

“See, they’re laughing at that. You’re not a good person or a smart person, but definitely not a good person.”

“I was reading this, in your [NYT] paper interview with Governor Pritzker of Illinois, and they asked him, what does the next president have to be. And he said ‘good, decent and kind,’ which, who can disagree with that? And certainly Trump has often not been good, decent or kind.”

[Bret Stephens tries to butt in]: “Right, but also —”

“But he’s not Hitler!” Maher fires back, shutting him down.

“Liberals used to always say, and they were right to say it, that a lot of this very violent rhetoric that we hear on the left, it inspires the borderline personalities to then do something. And they were right. I never thought they were wrong. But the shoe’s on the other foot now.”

“I mean, it’s on both feet. But you got to own this kind of rhetoric. This is why I was against this ‘he’s Hitler’ bullshit. I mean, if you really believe that he is a Hitler McPedophile, then you kind of have to kill him. That’s the mentality they have.”

[RedWave Press @RedWavePress]

Bill Maher: “Oh, big week for Kings… A weird week for Kings because King Charles of England was here. Spoke to Congress. Got a standing ovation from the people who were—used to be at the ‘No Kings’ rallies.”

[James Lindsay, anti-Communist @ConceptualJames]

Still very proud of my work and contribution to this amazing film. Watch it for free if you haven't see it! Share as you see fit!

[WhatWillYouDoWithoutYourFreedom @Tomato4usFields]

@GovernorVA So now you're a tour guide in a town that pretty much hates you.

[Insurrection Barbie @DefiyantlyFree]

Every ancient culture had its gods, and every god had a job. The god of the sunrises and sets. The god of the river floods and recedes. The god of war fights and rests. They were defined by their function, and their function had boundaries.

And then a voice speaks from a burning bush on the back side of a desert, and Moses makes the mistake of asking it for a name. The answer he gets back is Ehyeh Asher Ehyeh. I AM THAT I AM.

This God, unlike the gods of the past, is the ground of all existence itself. Everything that is, is because He is. You cannot name Him because naming Him would require a word bigger than any we have.

And then Jesus of Nazareth walks into the Gospel of John and picks that statement up and puts it in His own mouth. He does it not once but seven times, and each time He is making a claim so enormous that His first-century Jewish audience understood it immediately, even if modern readers who have been stripped of that context often miss it entirely.

“I am the bread of life.” “I am the light of the world.” “I am the door.” “I am the good shepherd.” “I am the resurrection and the life.” “I am the way, the truth, and the life.” “I am the true vine.”

Every single one of those statements begins with ego eimi, which means I AM. Those are the same words the Greek Septuagint used to translate the unpronounceable name God gave Moses at the bush.

Jesus is not using a figure of speech. He is not reaching for a metaphor. He is invoking Exodus 3. He is saying that the uncategorizable, uncontainable, unnameable God that Moses met on the mountain is standing in front of you right now in human skin.

And in case there was any ambiguity left in the room, He removes it completely in John 8:58. The Pharisees are arguing with Him about Abraham, and Jesus says, “Before Abraham was, I AM.”

He does not say I was. He says I AM. He uses the present tense. And the Pharisees picked up stones to kill Him, not because they were confused but because they understood exactly what He was claiming. He was not claiming to be old. He was not claiming to be a prophet. He was claiming to be the voice from the bush.

The I AM statements only work if you understand Exodus. They only carry their world-breaking weight if you know the covenant history, the burning bush, and the divine name that was so holy it could not be spoken aloud.

Jesus did not appear out of nowhere with a startup religion and a set of inspirational quotes. He walked into a story that had been unfolding for two thousand years and said He was the one the story had been about the entire time.

When you cut the Jewish root, when you treat His heritage as incidental, you sever the I AM statements from their foundation.

Those statements are God fulfilling the promise He made at the bush by showing up in person to do what He said He would do.

“I will be what I will be.” And what He chose to be was one of us, a Jewish man from Nazareth who carried the unspeakable name in a body that could bleed.

That is the character of God, and it is the thing that makes the biblical narrative unlike any other religious text on earth. He is not a God who stays abstract and unapproachable, hidden safely. He is a God who came down. He is a God who showed up. He is a God who says I AM and then proves it by becoming someone you can touch.

And He is a God that died for all of our sins so that we may be saved.

[James Lindsay, anti-Communist @ConceptualJames]

The Venn diagram of "anti-Erika Kirk" and "anti-Israel" is so close to a single perfect circle that it's highly indicative of serious mental illnesses, mind viruses, propaganda ops, and totally broken brains to hold those positions.

[Jeremy Boreing @JeremyDBoreing]

“Everyone knows.”

Argumentum ad Populum

Probably can’t even hear yourself using the language of your programmers.

[Scott Jennings @ScottJenningsKY]

DEM: "We haven’t had an African American Republican governor since reconstruction!"

ME: “The Republicans tried to elect one in Virginia.”

DEM: “Okay...” 😳

ME: "Then you got a white Democrat who gerrymandered the state! It’s all crumbling, John!"

[Jeremy Boreing @JeremyDBoreing]

Like the most vicious, catty girls you can imagine, Candace targets her victims with backbiting, slander, gossip, and innuendo.

In the weeks immediately after Charlie was killed, Candace launched into a steady stream of conspiracy theories about his assassination, strategically planting seeds with an audience already trained to read between her lines. Breadcrumb after breadcrumb, they began assembling a picture in which Erika was a suspect rather than a victim. By the time Candace pivoted in late February to the explicit, named, multi-part docuseries called Bride of Charlie, she was not introducing her followers to a new accusation, she was finally saying out loud what she had spent five months training them to suspect.

A core tenet of Candace's brand is "anti-matriarchy,” but Candace is the embodiment of a 50-year cultural project that has trained women to hate everything Erika Kirk represents: faithful marriage, devout motherhood, public beauty, the intact home, the woman who actually loves her husband.

The ‘negative feminine’ archetype displayed by Candace isn’t new— it has been documented in human literature and theology for thousands of years and explored by thinkers from Carl Jung and Jordan Peterson. And it’s values now guide our online culture:

[Jeremy Boreing @JeremyDBoreing]

The way a particular cohort of women is treating Erika Kirk is not random cruelty. It's the predictable output of fifty years of cultural rot.

The architecture of the negative feminine has captured our institutions, our media, and increasingly our own friends and family—and a thirty-seven-year-old widow with two small children is paying the price for it this week.

https://t.co/G9Tzbd3jwW