Thomas Lahrmann

Soon™

[Thomas Lahrmann @TommesJay]

@Hijack_23 @nateisaplatypus @TaofeekB3 @KiraJW @markgurman What are you guys talking that's been a standard feature in any headphone that has ANC for years

[Thomas Lahrmann @TommesJay]

@MKBHD This poll again just shows why TVs in stores are blown up in color saturation. People vote for eye cancer inducing color sat or pick out the obvious candle. F looks more natural and has more detail, the partly blown out candle is OK

[Thomas Lahrmann @TommesJay]

@GregPMarks @itsliamlive @MKBHD You're right in that our eyes have a much higher DR. I agree. But still, in this case, at what cost? Everything in P that's not the window just looks way off. Combine the window of P with the rest of O and you're good, but P on its own..

[Thomas Lahrmann @TommesJay]

@iam_tech @itsliamlive @MKBHD I thought we're comparing end results, not RAWs

[Thomas Lahrmann @TommesJay]

@MakrosPhagein @shad0wpt @MKBHD And at last I don't even know what your saying with the ''naturalness'' and ''megapixels'' thing. I'm fine with HDR as long as it's adequately applied

[Thomas Lahrmann @TommesJay]

@MakrosPhagein @shad0wpt @MKBHD Point is, you don't look at Marques and outside at the same time. I get that HDR has its merits, especially in difficult landscape photography at dusk or dawn, where it's able to resemble our vision. But in this case, yes u can see outside but the entire rest of the pic is ruined

[Thomas Lahrmann @TommesJay]

@MakrosPhagein @shad0wpt @MKBHD Just no dude, just no. You just don't get it because the nanosecond you refocus to look outside your iris adjusts

[Thomas Lahrmann @TommesJay]

@MKBHD What's with all the ppl not understanding y O is better? Let's assume you want natural colors and the photo to resemble the subject in focus naturally. In reality your eyes can't focus on two things at a time either. This is y the window is blown out. It's acurate. P is fake.

[Thomas Lahrmann @TommesJay]

@_dextop @lukabanjsak @MKBHD It's outside while the subject matter is inside

[Thomas Lahrmann @TommesJay]

@selormonray @MKBHD You can only look at one thing at a time, either inside at Marques or outside. The camera focuses at M so that's what you see adequately exposed. Just like in reality. P in the other hand is faking and it's doing a bad job at it; colors are way off

[Thomas Lahrmann @TommesJay]

@MakrosPhagein @shad0wpt @MKBHD If you were there in person focusing on Marques, the window too would be blown out in your peripheral vison, because your eyes adjust to the subject. Would you also say your eyes display bad quality?

[Thomas Lahrmann @TommesJay]

@GariniAlon @MKBHD P just looks artificial and fake. In a world where a photo should resemble reality, O wins

[Thomas Lahrmann @TommesJay]

@its_menieb @MKBHD Because it's more naturally looking. M is the subject, colors are natural in O. If u were there in person focusing at M, you too wouldn't see anything outside; the window too would be overexposed in your peripheral vision. HDR can be nice but in this case it's just fake

[Thomas Lahrmann @TommesJay]

@ChrisHazie @KitambiMichael @DrZoidb59930291 @thnk_thru_life @LoveDonald4Ever @charliespiering @JennaEllisEsq @realDonaldTrump @ChanelRion @OANN As she explains it, the machine that's scanning ballots is able to identify each of them via the bar code it's scanning. So the machine also has to know which one was already counted and which was not, counting each one at first scan only.

[Thomas Lahrmann @TommesJay]

@BrianRoemmele (+5) (-(5*5)) (+5)
(+5) (-25) (+5)
= -15

[Thomas Lahrmann @TommesJay]

@lawen4cer @textautomat Porsche Design eww

[Thomas Lahrmann @TommesJay]

@Samurai2119 @emsdi1 @II_UnLiMiT3D_II @JoeySalads @realDonaldTrump Ya, less infected in absolute numbers, but also less hospital space in absolute numbers, and less testing capacity in absolute numbers. You see where this is going? LOL