2001: Norge må være mer kyniske
2002: Norge må være mer kyniske
2003: Norge må være mer kyniske
2004: Norge må være mer kyniske
2005: Norge må være mer kyniske
2006: Norge må være mer kyniske
2007: Norge må være mer kyniske
2008: Norge må være mer kyniske
2009: Norge må være mer kyniske
2010: Norge må være mer kyniske
2011: Norge må være mer kyniske
2012: Norge må være mer kyniske
2013: Norge må være mer kyniske
2014: Norge må være mer kyniske
2015: Norge må være mer kyniske
2016: Norge må være mer kyniske
2017: Norge må være mer kyniske
2018: Norge må være mer kyniske
2019: Norge må være mer kyniske
2020: Norge må være mer kyniske
2021: Norge må være mer kyniske
2022: Norge må være mer kyniske
2023: Norge må være mer kyniske
2024: Norge må være mer kyniske
2025: Norge må være mer kyniske
2026: Nei ikke sånn
@RobertLeBref@EvaVlaar@tegnererik Then i stand corrected - that is public information and is easily within the scope of relevant and needed information that should be available to the public.. 👍
@Alfie07165@EvaVlaar@tegnererik Yes, but getting names is not the same as doxxing adresses and/or names of close family, putting them at risk. I saw several reports indicating personal info was released, that would normally mean more than just names, hence the patey-ruling - not for invest. journalism pr se
@wodesdo@EvaVlaar@tegnererik Well… them being named is not the same as doxxing them.. they have to tolerate the DM’s, that comes with the territory of their job/position of power and is not something the journalist should be sentenced for
@wodesdo@EvaVlaar@tegnererik I agree completely - of course they should know who makes decisions/votes on their behalf.
But let’s keep their private adress, where their families and kids live out of public knowledge.. it’s not relevant and it’s too many crazies in the world.. hence the patey-law🤷🏻♂️
@KetterStone@EvaVlaar@tegnererik Ofcourse they can - but there has to be a line regarding publishing information that can openly identify their home and/or other places outside of their public workadress.. if not for them personally then at least for the safety of their families, the kids.. no?
That might actually be one of the wildest VAR-decisions I’ve ever seen…
M’bappe going towards goal is "Attacker initiates contact".. 😂😂
#WorldCup#WC#FraSen ##France#Senegal
@khan_lala372@Osint613 No, the contact between Mette-Marit and Epstein is verified, but the framing of being "close associate" is a stretch - even though she was "too friendly" for a period of time before she cut contact
@utbytteprinsen Det der er så sjukt… samtidig blir jeg liksom ikke litt sjokkert engang..
…og det syns jeg OGSÅ er ganske sjukt..
.. samtidig har jeg jo hørt i det siste at vi lever i en syk kultur..
..but I digress..🥴