@OBG_AFC Remind us who your main club sponsor is and who your stadium is named after, then tell us again how you've not benefited from Oil Money.
Then tell us how shareholder loans didn't benefit Arsenal
@EttahHope@eazzy_fx@Arsenal@ManCity My point remains valid, you have benefited to tune of over £600m of Oil Money.
You're club also benefited from £300m+ of interest free shareholder loans to bypass FFP and PSR, which have now been deemed illegal.
You're club isn't the angel you think.
You're still a hypocrite
@JimHarr82743270@KippaxKids City haven't bought the stadium, they pay the council rent on a 250yr lease.
The infrastructure was for the commonwealth games, which Manchester Council could only apply for if City agreed to take the stadium afterwards.
Since then,City owners have spent billions to help locals
@jomur4@KippaxKids Manchester Council could only apply for the commonwealth games if City agreed to take the stadium afterwards, if City had said no, then Manchester would NOT have got the games. Missing out on millions in income, jobs, infrastructure and regeneration of a wasteland.
@pharrison79@lukestanley03 And why is Sugar Daddy money wrong,... because your clubs monopoly (and Liverpool +Arsenal) was coming to an end and you saw your arse, cried yourself to sleep every night in a bed you'd just shit and pissed in.
The fallout when City are found innocent is gonna be epic.
@Scm086@lukestanley03 And why is Sugar Daddy money wrong,... because your clubs monopoly (and Liverpool +United) was coming to an end and you saw your arse, cried yourself to sleep every night in a bed you'd just shit and pissed in.
The fallout when City are found innocent is gonna be epic.
@EttahHope@eazzy_fx@Arsenal Remind us who you main club sponsor is and who your stadium is named after? Where would you be without that £600m+ oil money.
Hypocritical fucktard
@Stew_Wills@Sympathyforth18@themagic_tophat Twist it however you like.
Don't forget your Norwich scarf when the Glazers take another £60m and then increase your debt by another £200m.
Meanwhile, we'll just crack on laughing at you. Have a great night.
@Stew_Wills@themagic_tophat That you are correct with, he's part of the Royal family, but he purchased City on his own, not for Abu Dhabi.
So in that respect, he's exactly the same as the Glazers.
@Stew_Wills@themagic_tophat If City are state owned, so are united.
In truth, they're both owned by an individual, what's also true, City's owner hasn't saddled them with a mountainous debt and doesn't take squillions every single season to spend on another sports club. VIVA LA GLAZERS
@afc_ftt@AnnCope16@jomur4@City_Xtra Have you seen the evidence, no you haven't, do you *want* City to be guilty, yes you do. Just admit it, you're not arsed about justice, you just want an excuse for your club winning 1 title for the billion quid they've spent since they won the FA Cup with Emery's squad.
@afc_ftt@AnnCope16@jomur4@City_Xtra On the contrary, it could potentially take longer as they EPL could have had their rules picked apart (like the shareholder loans), and as such , the writing up has to take into account why said rules were wrong.
@nelson_74@City_Xtra You do understand the huge difference between guilty and charges don't you..... well obvious you don't you thick fuck.
Remind us of the club with Manchester in it's name that was found guilty of FFP?
Clue... they play in red at the swamp.
@Alarsenalnews_ The insecurity of arsenal fans has no boundary.
City fans don't care if we're big, small or somewhere in the middle. In fact, we like being that small club that hoovers up the trophies while big clubs rummage for scraps. Keep crying about 115, the not guilty fallout will be epic