SETI

@ToniMichelleC26

Don't find fault, find a remedy: anyone can complain. .

Universe

Joined March 2022

292 Following

193 Followers

5.6K Posts

SETI

@ToniMichelleC26

3 days ago

https://t.co/jScTdbRQHW

ToniMichelleC26 retweeted

SaltyGoat

@SaltyGoat17

5 days ago

DEMOCRATS: "It's already illegal for non-citizens to vote so Voter ID is just stupid and unnecessary" ME: "It's already illegal for minors to drink alcohol so we don't need to check IDs at stores or bars anymore?" THAT is exactly how idiotic that argument is!!

267

17K

293

96K

SETI

@ToniMichelleC26

4 days ago

@Eric_TrumpRv Whom ever paved the way for her to be in Congress should be held liable as well....

115

SETI

@ToniMichelleC26

6 days ago

@lavern_spicer Thank you so much for saying this. It's true and we need more people like you.

SETI

@ToniMichelleC26

6 days ago

https://t.co/kSedvA5cx6

SETI

@ToniMichelleC26

9 days ago

https://t.co/9rukNcmlcl

ToniMichelleC26 retweeted

SaltyGoat

@SaltyGoat17

11 days ago

Gavin Newsom gets BlTCH SLAPPED!!! Story at 11....

247

38K

411

303K

ToniMichelleC26 retweeted

Whiplash437

@MrWhiplash_

10 days ago

I was listening to this Nick Shirley interview about Somalians being imported by the Lutheran Church, so I started researching 🚨 It was Barack Obama who paid the Lutheran church NGO and additional NGOs over $100 million to bring in the Somalians and dump them in Minnesota Obama funded it, here’s a list of all the NGOs Barack Obama paid to bring Somalians into America - Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service - Church World Service - Episcopal Migration Ministries - Ethiopian Community Development Council - HIAS (formerly Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society) - International Rescue Committee - U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants - United States Conference of Catholic Bishops/Migration and Refugee Services - World Relief Corporation Roughly $108 million total funding specifically tied to Somali arrivals FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING.

408

13K

148K

ToniMichelleC26 retweeted

Tironianae 🍊🍊 Z. - Ultra Verbum Vincet

@Tironianae

10 days ago

For those that still don’t understand what Benghazi was all about: 🚨So here's the REAL story: Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to secretly retrieve US made Stinger Missiles that the State Dept had supplied to Ansar al Sharia in Libya WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission. Sec State Hillary Clinton had brokered the Libya deal through Ambassador Stevens and a Private Arms Dealer named Marc Turi, but some of the shoulder fired Stinger Missiles ended up in Afghanistan where they were used against our own military. On July 25th, 2012, a US Chinook helicopter was downed by one of them. Not destroyed only because the idiot Taliban didn't arm the missile. The helicopter didn't explode, but it had to land and an ordnance team recovered the missile’s serial number which led back to a cache of Stinger Missiles kept in Qatar by the CIA. Obama and Hillary were in full panic mode, so Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to retrieve the rest of the Stinger Missiles. This was a "do-or-die" mission, which explains the Stand Down Orders given to multiple rescue teams during the siege of the US Embassy. It was the State Dept, NOT the CIA, that supplied the Stinger Missiles to our sworn enemies because Gen. Petraeus at CIA would not approve supplying the deadly missiles due to their potential use against commercial aircraft. So then, Obama threw Gen. Petraeus under the bus when he refused to testify in support of Obama’s phony claim of a “spontaneous uprising caused by a YouTube video that insulted Muslims.” Obama and Hillary committed TREASON! THIS is what the investigation is all about, WHY she had a Private Server, (in order to delete the digital evidence), and WHY Obama, two weeks after the attack, told the UN that the attack was the result of the YouTube video, even though everyone KNEW it was not. Furthermore, the Taliban knew that the administration had aided and abetted the enemy WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission, so they began pressuring (blackmailing) the Obama Administration to release five Taliban generals being held at Guantanamo. Bowe Bergdahl was just a useful pawn used to cover the release of the Taliban generals. Everyone knew Bergdahl was a traitor but Obama used Bergdahl’s exchange for the five Taliban generals to cover that Obama was being coerced by the Taliban about the unauthorized Stinger Missile deal. So we have a traitor as POTUS that is not only corrupt, but compromised, as well and a Sec of State that is a serial liar, who perjured herself multiple times at the Congressional Hearings on Benghazi. Perhaps this is why no military aircraft were called upon for help in Benghazi: because the administration knew that our enemies had Stinger Missiles that, if used to down those planes, would likely be traced back to the CIA cache in Qatar and then to the State Dept’s illegitimate arms deal in Libya. Forward this again and again and again until everyone reads the true story of Benghazi.

Tironianae's tweet photo. For those that still don’t understand what Benghazi was all about:

🚨So here's the REAL story:

Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to secretly retrieve US made Stinger Missiles that the State Dept had supplied to Ansar al Sharia in Libya WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission.

Sec State Hillary Clinton had brokered the Libya deal through Ambassador Stevens and a Private Arms Dealer named Marc Turi, but some of the shoulder fired Stinger Missiles ended up in Afghanistan where they were used against our own military. On July 25th, 2012, a US Chinook helicopter was downed by one of them. Not destroyed only because the idiot Taliban didn't arm the missile. The helicopter didn't explode, but it had to land and an ordnance team recovered the missile’s serial number which led back to a cache of Stinger Missiles kept in
Qatar by the CIA.

Obama and Hillary were in full panic mode, so Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to retrieve the rest of the Stinger Missiles. This was a "do-or-die" mission, which explains the Stand Down Orders given to multiple rescue teams during the siege of the US Embassy.

It was the State Dept, NOT the CIA, that supplied the Stinger Missiles to our sworn enemies because Gen. Petraeus at CIA would not approve supplying the deadly missiles due to their potential use against commercial aircraft. So then, Obama threw Gen. Petraeus under the bus when he refused to testify in support of Obama’s phony claim of a “spontaneous uprising caused by a YouTube video that insulted Muslims.”
Obama and Hillary committed TREASON!

THIS is what the investigation is all about, WHY she had a Private Server, (in order to delete the digital evidence), and WHY Obama, two weeks after the attack, told the UN that the attack was the result of the YouTube video, even though everyone KNEW it was not.

Furthermore, the Taliban knew that the administration had aided and abetted the enemy WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission, so they began pressuring (blackmailing) the Obama Administration to release five Taliban generals being held at Guantanamo.

Bowe Bergdahl was just a useful pawn used to cover the release of the Taliban generals. Everyone knew Bergdahl was a traitor but Obama used Bergdahl’s exchange for the five Taliban generals to cover that Obama was being coerced by the Taliban about the unauthorized Stinger Missile deal.

So we have a traitor as POTUS that is not only corrupt, but compromised, as well and a Sec of State that is a serial liar, who perjured herself multiple times at the Congressional Hearings on Benghazi. Perhaps this is why no military aircraft were called upon for help in Benghazi: because the administration knew that our enemies had Stinger Missiles that, if used to down those planes, would likely be traced back to the CIA cache in Qatar and then to the State Dept’s illegitimate arms deal in Libya.

Forward this again and again and again until everyone reads the true story of Benghazi.

957

25K

15K

632K

SETI

@ToniMichelleC26

11 days ago

@JamieThackSF @planet_Beasts Good Point! 👍

SETI

@ToniMichelleC26

11 days ago

@theamerican45 Yes, because a good journalist you should never know what their political views are....

ToniMichelleC26 retweeted

Deep Leaks

@DeepLeaksHQ

12 days ago

Remember that time when Hillary Clinton introduced her friend George Soros and his interest to get involved in US elections? The Internet sure doesn't. Why? Because it has been wiped from existence for the most part. Turns out I found a copy of the file I had archived years ago. Be a real shame if people save and shared this widely.

422

19K

12K

206K

SETI

@ToniMichelleC26

13 days ago

@RechargAmerica Yes

SETI

@ToniMichelleC26

13 days ago

I asked Grok if this was true.. No, that claim is not true. The post and graphic do not cite any actual poll that found 65% of Americans saying Islam has a positive impact on the United States. Reliable recent surveys show the opposite on the closest matching questions. A Pew Research Center survey from spring 2026 asked directly about impact: 42% of U.S. adults said Muslim Americans are having a negative impact on the country, only 17% said a positive impact, and 40% said none or neutral. The same survey found 51% saying Islam is more likely than other religions to encourage violence (76% among Republicans/leaners vs. 29% among Democrats/leaners). Views have grown more negative and partisan since shortly after 9/11. A University of Maryland Critical Issues Poll found about 65% of Americans holding a favorable view of Muslim people in 2025 (down from a 2021 peak of 78%). Favorable views of Islam as a religion were lower, around 49%. That is not the same as saying the religion has a positive impact on the country. Other data from similar polling showed only 28% saying Muslim Americans strengthen American society. A separate Gallup poll found 65% saying it would be positive if more Americans in general were religious. That question was not about Islam. The graphic comes from the same account that posted it and presents no source, methodology, or polling firm. It appears to be a fabricated or heavily distorted claim, likely mixing a favorability number about Muslims with a different question about Islam’s impact. Actual polling on impact and on the religion itself is far less positive than advertised.