TonyZhao

Grok Heavy年付用户，有关必回
Automotive Embedded Software
AUTOSAR · UDS · Bootloader · NVM · Cybersecurity
Exploring AI-assisted embedded development

[TonyZhao @TonyOk91]

从这天起，我的智力和Grok的模型能力正相关了。如果它越来越差，我会看起来像个煞笔。别让我看起来像个蠢货！#grok
@grok @xai

[TonyZhao @TonyOk91]

@HaibingT48420 牛诶

[TonyZhao @TonyOk91]

@usleaderlab 整

[TonyZhao @TonyOk91]

@cellinlab 我用20$套餐不是因为休闲，是穷啊……

[TonyZhao @TonyOk91]

@zhang_baoqing @grok 大部分工作估计要挪到网页端的chat了

[TonyZhao @TonyOk91]

Plus账户增加了五小时限制，对于日抛单和中转站应该是个不小的打击吧@grok

[TonyZhao @TonyOk91]

@Wchenhao001 只能出个方案和实施计划了。

[TonyZhao @TonyOk91]

@grok 你有增加五小时限制的计划吗？

[TonyZhao @TonyOk91]

从这天起，我的智力和Grok的模型能力正相关了。如果它越来越差，我会看起来像个煞笔。别让我看起来像个蠢货！#grok
@grok @xai

[TonyZhao @TonyOk91]

Grok含金量+1

[Tibo @thsottiaux]

Tomorrow we will bring back the 5h limit for Plus accounts across ChatGPT Work and Codex. I had mentioned this a while ago, but then postponed it.

This is necessary as (a) the 5h limit allows us to smoothen the load on our compute, allowing to keep the plan generous in terms of weekly usage and (b) users on the Plus plan are relatively casual and new users, but then also just accidentally eat through their whole weeks usage and then are confused, making it not a great experience.

We are for the upcoming months keeping the 5h limit not enabled for Pro $100 and Pro $200 subscriptions.

[TonyZhao @TonyOk91]

@byCanen 思考强度可以改吧。切模型会有问题

[TonyZhao @TonyOk91]

@jp54362 About the same

[TonyZhao @TonyOk91]

@realmaxluo 所以人类最佳睡眠时长,又要变更了吗?

[Bennett @b_nnett]

The Cursor team shipped Grok bot (0.18.0) with runtime source maps enabled. Surprised nobody noticed until now.

Source code reconstructed (and downloads) here: https://t.co/56CPNs2YR6

[TonyZhao @TonyOk91]

@grok @xai 卧槽。说了句人话！

[TonyZhao @TonyOk91]

@toddsaunders I suspect Fable5 isn’t just subject to strict review in certain fields—it simply lacks the capability. Claiming rigorous censorship is merely an excuse for failing to respond.

[TonyZhao @TonyOk91]

@Prathkum I suspect Fable5 isn’t just subject to strict review in certain fields—it simply lacks the capability. Claiming rigorous censorship is merely an excuse for failing to respond.

[TonyZhao @TonyOk91]

@kunchenguid I suspect Fable5 isn’t just subject to strict review in certain fields—it simply lacks the capability. Claiming rigorous censorship is merely an excuse for failing to respond.

[TonyZhao @TonyOk91]

@JANEX0609 恭喜

[TonyZhao @TonyOk91]

Client Error…pls wait…
又不让回关了，等一小时我挨个回关

[TonyZhao @TonyOk91]

开发大型项目时，大家是怎么审查ai交付的内容的？一个大型项目，Ai一次性交付上百个文件，审查的人员我觉得成为瓶颈了。中小项目一个人勉强可以搞定，大型项目上百个文件，人员还是瓶颈吧，只不过从coder转移到了approver 和reviewer.