Perfect quote from @HesterPeirce today
"Make tools available that empower your users to see what is happening onchain and offchain. Figure out what the right balance of centralization and decentralization is for your project and be transparent with the public about the trade-offs you have made and the resulting risks to users. And, more generally, be honest."
Transparency/communication/investor relations is value accretive to markets (your token)
Lol a few days ago I was actually considering if that could be a conflict because I knew that the next 8K form would only be available on June 1st.
But iirc the last time this situation happened, it settled in the "logical way", ie YES in this case.
This is one of the dumbest things I've ever seen. That's the equivalent of saying "a bet on the Bears to win the 1985 super bowl didn't resolve because the newspaper didn't publish the box score til Monday."
No skin in the game, but whatever UMA/Polymarket are doing here is nuts.
Brutal sentiment in crypto, but some of the liquid funds we know will have generated their highest alpha month since Aug 2021. Driven by extreme token dispersion. Active is back, and investors are distracted elsewhere.
@horndogdothl@0xCryptoSam I'm not sure why anyone says Hyperliquid needs KYC. KYC has always been for onramp/offramp. Bc that's where the hypothetical break in the KYC ring fence comes from. HL doesn't host this service which is why you can only transfer in from bank if via 3rd party (where they KYC).
HYPE investors believe the risk of competitors launching regulated perps in the US (e.g., Kalshi) is less destructive than the reward of Hyperliquid legally accessing the US audience (e.g., Robinhood 0DTE traders).
I agree with this assumption.
So simple and yet many projects still aren't making the switch
What is the value (incl potential value) of the asset I am holding?
People care about holding assets that accrue value... not phantom network value or an overall chain economic value