Your US vs UK homicide chart is a lazy deflection, not leadership. Yes, America's gun homicide rate drags their total higher — that's not news. But Britons aren't being shot in the streets; they're being stabbed.
In the year to March 2025, there were still 205 knife/sharp instrument homicides in England & Wales (down from 261). Knives feature in ~40%+ of our homicides.
That's the reality Vance was highlighting after Henry Nowak — an 18-year-old British student stabbed to death with a 21cm ceremonial blade by Vickrum Singh Digwa (British-born). Digwa lied about a "racist attack," and police handcuffed the dying victim. Classic two-tier failure. - https://t.co/41hAvD6Xh2
UK knife crime remains a public epidemic despite strict gun laws: ~50,000+ sharp instrument offences annually. Black Britons (4% of population) are dramatically overrepresented as both victims and offenders in London knife/robbery/homicide stats — often 40%+ in urban violence data. White British victims in certain categories don't match that. - https://t.co/TVwuWaElz1
Foreign national offenders clog our prisons (12%+ of population), with specific nationalities overrepresented in violent/sexual/drug crimes. High net migration + failed integration in pockets has strained cohesion, grooming scandals, and trust in policing. Suppressing ethnicity data or shouting "whatabout America" doesn't fix a kid bleeding out from a kirpan-style blade on a British street.
Vance pointed to elite denial and "self-hatred" eroding safety. Your chart doesn't rebut that — it proves the point. MPs dodging domestic failures while lecturing abroad is exactly why we're a laughing stock. Address the knife crime, integration, and two-tier realities, or step aside. Brits deserve better than deflection.
Data over slogans.
Both crimes are heinous and deserve full condemnation. No one serious is defending rape or murder. The issue isn't "white people do bad things too" — that's a deflection. The outrage over Henry Nowak's case is about the specific, documented failures in the police response, enabled by a false racism claim, which your post ignores while trying to equate unrelated cases. - https://t.co/CKXFmwtyKT
Henry Nowak, an 18-year-old student, was stabbed five times (including a fatal chest wound) by Vickrum Singh Digwa with a 21cm dagger.
Digwa (and his brother) called police and falsely claimed Nowak had racially abused and assaulted them. When officers arrived, they believed the killer's story over the dying victim.
Bodycam footage (released with family permission) shows Nowak repeatedly telling police "I've been stabbed" and "I can't breathe." One officer replied, "I don't think you have, mate." They handcuffed him behind his back as he lay bleeding out and read him his rights. He died in police custody
That's not standard procedure for a stabbing victim. It's a failure driven by immediate deference to a "racism" accusation — exactly what fuels "two-tier policing" concerns. The killer got a life sentence (min. 21 years), but the family's grief includes knowing their son wasn't treated as the victim even while dying. Prime Minister Keir Starmer called it sickening and said police have serious questions to answer. The force apologised. - https://t.co/X7KCGTSpXo
Now contrast with the John Ashby case you cited (white man who raped a Sikh woman, mistaking her for Muslim, with religiously aggravated abuse). Horrific. He was prosecuted, convicted, and given life (min. 14 years). The victim reported it, was believed, and justice followed through the courts. Was she handcuffed while reporting the rape? Was she dismissed with "I don't think you have, mate"? Were officers siding with her attacker out of fear of "offending" anyone? No. That's the difference in context you're erasing. - https://t.co/N08MemUkqd
Cherry-picking white-perpetrator crimes to "both sides" a case involving a false racism claim, immediate police disbelief of a dying innocent boy, and clear procedural collapse isn't analysis — it's whataboutism to shield uncomfortable patterns. People aren't raging at "all minorities"; they're raging at a system that appears to prioritise not offending certain groups over basic victim care, especially when the perpetrator weaponises race. The Saudi student case you mentioned also doesn't match this dynamic.
You're baiting by design: imply that noticing these failures makes people equivalent to inciters of violence, while you platform selective outrage. Legitimate anger at preventable institutional failure isn't the same as your hypothetical "pure cold rage" incitement. Address the actual video and timeline instead of deflecting.
Keir Starmer, the one-sided buffoon calling Elon Musk an “interferer” for tweeting about a UK stabbing: Your own Labour Party sent nearly 100 staff to campaign door-to-door for Kamala Harris in US swing states.
You defended it as “spare time” volunteering. That’s actual boots-on-the-ground foreign election meddling. Musk just posts facts. Hypocrite.
Over 4,600 'new' teachers in priority areas? Nice spin while smiling, Bridget.
Reality check from DfE's own 2025 census: overall state school teachers DOWN 1,900 since last year. Primary down 2,900.
Total workforce shrinking on your watch. You've just rebadged retention + selective categories against a 2023 baseline to hit 70% of a broken pledge.
Parents see bigger classes & fewer teachers overall. Stop the spin
It's great that more kids are getting a solid start to the school day with breakfast clubs available. That said, calling them "free" isn't accurate. They're free at the point of use for parents, but the taxpayer is footing the bill. The government's own manifesto estimated the full national rollout would cost £315 million per year by 2028/29. - https://t.co/WzCI5Tyjtp
For the 10 million breakfasts delivered so far (across ~1,250 schools), direct funding to schools has already run into the £15–20 million range so far (£1 per pupil + £25/day fixed costs for staffing etc.). - https://t.co/susOI0ECjQ
Parents aren't paying directly at the gate, but we all pay through taxes. Nothing is truly "free" when it's funded by public money. Better to be honest about the real cost.
It's your right to criticise Israel — but your complete silence on the other side exposes the https://t.co/Bs2cYIeI48 the last 10 years, Hezbollah and allies in Lebanon have fired 10,000–18,000+ rockets, missiles, drones and mortars at Israeli civilians. Thousands since Oct 2023 alone, plus renewed barrages in 2026. Indiscriminate attacks on towns, homes and cities.
Lebanon's government and army? They've done next to nothing to stop it — despite UN Resolution 1701 and their own "bans". Hezbollah operates as a state-within-a-state, using Lebanese civilians as shields, while you say nothing.
You've repeatedly called Israeli responses "war crimes", "ethnic cleansing" and demanded UK sanctions. Yet zero condemnation of Hezbollah's rocket terror, their initiation of fire, or Lebanon's failure to disarm them.
At what point does any country say "enough"? After thousands of rockets aimed at its civilians? After decades of an Iranian proxy army on its border?
Call out Israel where warranted, fine. But pretending only one side exists isn't criticism — it's propaganda. Why the selective outrage, Andy?
The Sikh community issued public statements condemning this murder and distancing themselves precisely because key aggravating factors made it stand out:
Digwa stabbed unarmed 18-year-old Henry Nowak five times with a 21cm blade he carried openly, which he linked to his Sikh faith. He also had a smaller kirpan. UK law provides a religious exemption under the Criminal Justice Act 1988 for Sikhs to carry kirpans (no strict size limit in some contexts for religious reasons). This case has made far more Britons aware of that exemption and prompted calls for review. -https://t.co/dWGFJNKwPh
Digwa and his brother Gurpreet falsely claimed Henry racially abused him (calling him a "Paki"), assaulted him, and knocked off his turban. The judge ruled this a "wicked lie" — Henry said nothing racist. This false racism accusation directly influenced police, who handcuffed the dying Henry (who pleaded "I can't breathe" and "I've been stabbed") while prioritising the suspect's story. - https://t.co/1abZGMO9e2
This wasn't a generic "white person commits murder" case you lazily equate it to. The racial dimension came from the perpetrator's side weaponising a false racism claim against a white victim, combined with a religious weapon exemption and disputed policing that treated the victim differently. Court records and bodycam footage confirm these facts. -https://t.co/ROoe3rsUgy
Sikhs as a community bear no collective guilt for one killer — they rightly condemned it as contrary to their faith. But dismissing legitimate public questions about knife exemptions, false race claims, and police response as "far-right" is the same selective lens you apply elsewhere. Whites don't get "isolated individual" framing when collective narratives suit certain agendas (e.g. historical guilt).
Conflating this with routine murders to deflect scrutiny makes you look like you're pushing an agenda over a dead teenager. This case exposed real issues around equal application of justice — not anti-Sikh bigotry.
This isn’t an apology — it’s damage control after you got caught.
You said “white cold rage” three times on air, deliberately twisting Nigel Farage’s call for “pure cold rage” over the Henry Nowak case into something racial. That wasn’t a slip; it was framing designed to smear and inflame.
An X post changes nothing. @BBC should be issuing a proper on-air correction and apology for airing this blatant misrepresentation.
Even if we pretend it was an innocent “misremembering,” this was live TV — but you repeated the loaded word multiple times (while apparently checking notes), and you, producers, and multiple BBC staff still had every chance to correct it during the show or in post-broadcast editing for iPlayer. You didn’t. So you’re either lying about it being accidental, or such a careless reporter you deserve sacking.
I’d say exactly the same if you’d done this to any other politician. When tensions are this high, the BBC doesn’t get to add fuel then shrug it off with a tweet. Do better. Or at least be honest about what you’re doing.
Either lying or willfully blind. White-led institutions are running anti-White policies via DEI ideology. Evidence:
AF: Unlawful positive discrimination against White men to hit diversity targets. Official MoD inquiry confirmed it. - https://t.co/fEeNKjzw47
Rotherham grooming gangs: 1,400+ White British girls abused by Pakistani-heritage men; authorities ignored it for years fearing "racism" labels. Jay Report: - https://t.co/s98XSLSjCa
Two-tier policing: Henry Nowak case—White teen stabbed & dying, handcuffed while believing killer's racist attack lie. Bodycam sparked outrage. - https://t.co/fiNtQyJBUv
Open your eyes. This isn't "delusional"—it's documented."
Pot, meet kettle. You and Labour ran deeply misleading attack ads on Sunak claiming he "doesn't believe" in jailing child sex offenders — selective stats twisted into personal smears. Now you cry "disgraceful" over Reform editing a clip? This isn't about Kemi or standards. It's pure fear of Reform eating your lunch. Hypocrite. All parties do it, but own your own game.
Examples of Wes Streeting and Labour doing the exact same thing:
2023 Sunak child sex offenders attack ads: Labour (with Streeting front and centre) posted ads saying "Rishi Sunak doesn’t think adults convicted of sexually assaulting children should go to prison" based on aggregated stats about some offenders getting non-custodial sentences over 13 years. Streeting defended it aggressively: "Labour is absolutely right to take the gloves off... I don’t think it was a mistake at all. I absolutely stand by Labour’s ad — and there’s more to come." Critics called it a grotesque misrepresentation turning policy data into a personal belief smear. - https://t.co/r6aVTSqBES
HS selective statistics: As Health Secretary, Streeting repeatedly highlighted cherry-picked positives (e.g., waiting list drops, targets hit) while downplaying or ignoring unreported removals from lists, cancer waits, and broader failures. Fact-checks and analyses labelled his claims "highly selective" and misleading. - https://t.co/aItTVWZtZU
Broader Labour tactics: Labour has run attack broadcasts and leaflets accused of misrepresenting opponents (including fabricating or heavily editing quotes/context on Reform, Tories, etc.). Broadcasters forced them to tone down "US-style" offensive Reform attack ads using selective quotes. Scottish Labour got rapped for fake quotes on leaflets. - https://t.co/4dmqkvcRSz
Doesn't matter the party, Labour, Tories, Greens, Reform etc you all do the same, you cherry pick data and quotes etc for your own narrative, none an honest one amongst you all.
Zack, calling Reform UK supporters of a "US-style charging system" for the NHS isn't just spin — it's an outright lie.
Reform UK's official policy, repeated in their manifesto Our Contract with You, on their policies page, and in public statements including "Reform UK will never charge you to use the NHS. Simple." is crystal clear: The NHS will remain free at the point of use, funded by general taxation. No patient charges at the GP, no bills for operations, no American-style insurance model replacing core NHS care. - https://t.co/mOU53nd0yu
They've said it over and over: "Services will always be free at the point of use."
Independent fact-checkers like Full Fact have confirmed Reform is committed to this and has explicitly rejected charging patients. - https://t.co/daxEyo3liK
Your claim twists their actual position — using private capacity and vouchers to smash waiting lists while keeping care free — into something they don't support. That's not "misunderstanding evidence." That's deliberate misrepresentation to smear opponents.
If you're going to attack a party, at least engage with what they actually say instead of inventing positions. The public deserves better than Green Party fiction. Facts first.
You just show you're another lying politician.
No of course not, but the world is full of gullible people, if all their see and read from the Mayor of London is his tweets without counter arguments in the comments, then they aren't getting the full picture?
We all know these politicians don't care about the comments or the people, but at least let the people criticise and get their view point across.
No doubt, there will be a fair bit of racist shite in there as well which takes away from my own comments above, but people should still be able to reply.
@TheReturnOfLCF@elonmusk I've called for this myself. No government entity should be allowed to stop the people from replying to their comments. The grey ticked accounts shouldn't be allowed to block or limit replies.
How dare you call out Claire Coutinho as "anti net zero" for simply highlighting facts from the report itself? You're caught misleading by ignoring what CBI themselves say.
ECIU (funded by Quadrature Climate Foundation — big Labour donor) commissioned this. CBI Economics explicitly disclaimers: "Findings represent the views of CBI Economics and do not necessarily reflect the views of the CBI, its members, or ECIU." Claire was right to flag it. - https://t.co/aoCngw2mza
The numbers? £105bn GVA & 1.1m "supported" jobs (direct: ~£36.7bn & 308k; rest via multipliers ~1:1.85). - https://t.co/P9JL23EmbJ
ndependent ONS data (March 2026): Just 652k green jobs FTEs total in 2024. - https://t.co/Uzw4bRnore
Growth in renewables is real, but gross advocacy figures ignore net costs — higher industrial bills, grid upgrades, subsidies on consumer bills/taxpayers, and displacements elsewhere.
UK energy prices remain a competitiveness drag.
Patting Labour on the back with one-sided spin while dismissing scrutiny isn't delivery — it's deflection. How dare you twist basic accountability into opposition?
I'm no Tory either, but whilst all you lot (all parties) spin the data to your narrative, you lie to the public. It's about time you are all called out on it. Shame on you.
@ANT0NINUS_PIUS@Conservatives@KemiBadenoch You can argue the content of her quote, that's fine. But you posted it to race bait. Taking several words from her quote for your own agenda.
I'm not a fan of the tories by any means, but lying about something isn't right either.