@NUFCNews24 As someone else has said rules remain the same, just letting city have there deal. That said, surely there has been a precedent set here, that would make it easier for Newcastle to challenge legally if they were block by the PL
@RedRoseMichelle Tim Sherwood is an utter spunk trumpet and takes every opportunity to spout anti Newcastle sentiment. Average player in his day, dreadful manager and arrogant pundit
@ToonMouthTyne Completely agree but PSR forces us to trade & it also makes zero sense having a valuable asset on the books who is refusing to play. Yes we could have forced him to stay and play, but youโd get minimal effort and see his value drop. As much as I hate it, our hand has been forced
@__37JH Completely agree but PSR forces us to trade and it also makes zero sense having a value asset on the books who is refusing to play. Yes we could have forced him to stay and plays, but youโd get minimal effort and see his value drop. As much as I hate it, our hand has been forced
@FabrizioRomano Long term contract means nothing to this rat, Liverpool fans will be on the receiving end of that in due course, no way he stays there 6 years. As for you Fabrizio, you are a parasite of the highest order, a two bit, bottom of the barrel โin the knowโ, Liverpools bitch boy
Laughed reading that heโll sign a 6 year deal like, should have the caveat next to it of โwhich wonโt be worth the paper itโs written onโ. Good riddance to Alex the rat. Once revered amongst the Geordie faithful, now remembered for all the wrong reasons. A legacy forever tainted
NUFC lose. Isak & Liverpool win. Simple as that.
Newcastle had little choice, in reality, but to do a deal, as it became an untenable situation. A bad smell that would have lingered all season. The money is good, as a trade off - not game-changing, due to sell on % and other factors - but good. The timing poor.
While choice was forced from them in selling, they definitely DO have a choice about signing a striker today. And must. That has to be a non-negotiable.
If they don't - and varying levels of responsibility and decision-making for this filters from the top right down to Eddie Howe - they're letting the current crop of players down.
Their incoming business, while very expensive, has looked positive so far, none more so than the capture of Nick Woltemade to clearly fill Isak's void.
However, expecting a young lad, with only a true half season of top level, regular experience under his belt, no PL appearances, fresh through the door, to carry the scoring and creative burden of the whole XI across three competitions, all the way to at least January, is irresponsible. In fact, it's lunacy.
Isak is gone. It had to happen. And while his talents are a loss, it won't be mourned as it may once have been.
The real challenge now is ensuring Woltemade is not forced to play midweek, weekend, week after week - which happened to Isak at times - from now to the winter. NUFC cannot continue the season with one striker - another has to be signed. The clock is ticking. And it feels definitive.
@NCSL1892 @NUFC Absolute chancers done nothing more than unsettle our player & heโs been dumb enough to buy it. ยฃ110m was kicking the tyres, tyres their scallies would usually steal had it been a car. I hope Isak is feeling royally mugged off & a big slice of humble pie is on the menu tomorrow