@MahadSo21992079@kaskaide1@ODA_Foxtrot You really don't understand physics maximum takeoff weight is different parameter the parameter you are saying is payload which is only 1500kg
@MahadSo21992079@kaskaide1@ODA_Foxtrot Dinga is different it's 8th may 314 km is 10th morning listen from 43:30 from the commanding officer https://t.co/gzzXJBzCTJ
@MahadSo21992079@kaskaide1@ODA_Foxtrot You know. I told you to always use math's. A akinci RCS will be very less for S400 to hit at 220km+ . 2nd the flames are too big as akinci fuel capacity is half. 3rd akinci cost is 30mill dollar.
@MahadSo21992079@kaskaide1@ODA_Foxtrot What bol you forgot that I did a mathematical calculation with your claim and your data and proved you. So try to use mathematics not emotion in your statement.
@MahadSo21992079@kaskaide1@ODA_Foxtrot CDS did not acknowledge it, Air marshal didn't cknowledge in press conference. Your Airforce and DGISPR has categorically said no loss. 2nd the guy above accepts it's saab even with your said price of f-16(60 mill) you did see the result. Come better prepared with statistics.
Now letβs talk about how India destroyed Pakistani air defense in Lahore and its surrounding areas.
1) / 2) The first and second videos show an Indian drone (probably an IAI Harop) striking a target in Lahore near Walton Airport.
The strike at Walton destroyed the command-and-control center of an HQ-9, i.e., the Chinese long-range air defense system.
The fact that Pakistan couldnβt shoot these drones down clearly shows how dire their situation was.
Not only did they lose a vital system, but this also created panic and fear among the public.
3) The third video clearly shows a Pakistani journalist talking about the drone strikes in Lahore and Rawalpindi.
While the video is being recorded, we can see the HQ-16/HQ-9 systems being relocated from their original locations.
India reportedly used the Harop because it is built specifically to hunt radar-dependent systems like Pakistanβs HQ-9. Its passive seeker homes in on radar emissions, and its loitering capability allows it to wait for the radar to switch on before striking. Being uncrewed, it also allowed India to hit the target without risking a pilot or aircraft.
Pakistani radars and air defense systems were sitting ducks.
4) The fourth image shows the destroyed command-and-control module of the HQ-9. The strike also led to casualties among the system's operators.
The funniest part is that although Pakistan claims to have destroyed systems like the S-400, they cannot provide a single image or video like we can.