🚨🗣️New: Zlatan Ibrahimovic on England’s equalizer through Bellingham against Norway should not have stood:
“I don’t care if it’s the 1st minute or the 90th minute. The laws are the laws. If the ball hits a camera cable and the trajectory changes, that is outside interference. The referee is supposed to stop play immediately.”
“People keep talking about Bellingham’s finish. Fine. It was a good finish. But the question is: should the attack have even continued? According to the rules, no.”
“Football cannot become a game where we ignore the law because the goal looks spectacular. If Norway scored the same goal against England, there would be outrage everywhere.”
“You cannot tell players to respect the Laws of the Game and then ignore them when it’s convenient. If the ball was affected by the cable, the correct restart is a dropped ball. No attack. No equalizer. No debate.”
CRELLY YOU FUCKER, WE FOUND OUT YOU EDITED OUT THE FUCKING MCCRELLY CHALLENGE, WE GOT THE VIDEOS AND NOW YOU WILL PAAAAAAY
@crellythecow WE DEMAND YOU EAT THE FUCKIN MCRELLY AGAIN WITH THE FRIES AND THE EXTRA SODA. I GAINED A LB BECAUSE OF YOUUUUUUU
I have to be honest: I can’t take this World Cup seriously anymore.
3 outcomes now directly impacted by very questionable VAR interventions.
Croatia, Egypt, and now Norway.
A goal taken away because VAR intervened over a dive, and a goal scored against them because a ball hit a cable and they didn’t.
As an impartial observer, the outcome no longer feels legitimate.
FIFA saying the ball sensor didn't detect hitting the camera wire really just causes problems for them
Because you can see it hit something and move, so how can we trust the sensor
And where's Croatia in all of this
Cancelling a goal for Norway cus Haaland pushed an English player, but not cancelling England's goal when the ball had previously hit the wire and should've been dropped?