𝐓𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞

Electrical Engg.|Defence Enthusiast and Learner

[𝐓𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 @Toxic__10_]

🚨#Breaking :Satellite Shock-INDIA deploys its Monstrous #SSBN as part of its NUCLEAR TRIAD amid heightened tensions Between #IndiaPakistanWar

INDIA deploys INS ARIHANT & INS ARIGHAT with K4 SLBM which can Target Pakistan from 4000km away

Probably INS Aridhaman into Sea Trials

[𝐓𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 @Toxic__10_]

@effsixteen Everyone knows... how risky is to be in Pakistan..
Their a reason why our cricket teams never allowed to step in Pakistan....

Even allah don't know what is going in pakis brain..u guys could explode anytime so..
I congratulate pak on this deal but feels sorry for the ceremony...

[𝐓𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 @Toxic__10_]

@intel_view I cant believe it have Control fins lol

[𝐓𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 @Toxic__10_]

@kaskaide1 @therealp0litik I disagree with your "rafale will ever" part
Indian missiles are no doubt quality wise top notch and its now confirmed that further 114 Rafale will come with indian wepons..
Brahmos NG and Astra mk 3 + Rudram series... is anyday better than chinese counterparts

[𝐓𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 @Toxic__10_]

@Firezstarter1 Ig they will do some 2 3 more final trials... before the orders

And i wish they change its design to have better RCS like NSM or Storm shadow...

[𝐓𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 @Toxic__10_]

@GADADHARGH56880 @rust_cohle77 @therealp0litik Brahmos VLS is custom made for Brahmos only.. and no point in doing all drama to convert it for LRLACM and replace supersonic Brahmos with subsonic LRLACM...also when 800km brahmos is coming...

If ships will have these then they will come in 4×4 slanted launchers...

[𝐓𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 @Toxic__10_]

@hasanfuf5 U are absolutely right

[𝐓𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 @Toxic__10_]

@rust_cohle77 @therealp0litik Brahmos length weight sized all mismatches with LRLACM...
Also Brahmos lauchers are custom made for brahmos...

One of the unsolved mysteries in indian defense is UVLS... right now no s single progress is this regard is going on
Very disappointing... that we arnt developing UVLS

[𝐓𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 @Toxic__10_]

@rust_cohle77 @therealp0litik Antishipping is too complex... and really so many challenging things are involved...

Even the first step aka detection is the toughest task... and even if u get them...u need midcourse guidance... continuous tracks....

Many more..

[𝐓𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 @Toxic__10_]

@SubhanJaved911 @Volkov_JXT CAMM is anyday many times ahead of Tughrils SAM but when it will come to counter the real world threat so Tughril will have capacity to launch 3-4 salvo per incoming supersonic threat...

But CAMM onboard Babur will not able to afford this...

And CAMM is good but isnt fullproof

[𝐓𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 @Toxic__10_]

@SubhanJaved911 @Volkov_JXT I think the virus of low magazine depth is spread to PN also... sad to see.... these beautiful ships are getting just 12-16 VLS of CAMM ER like SAMs...

The only potent ship which can stand in front of massive fireworks is tughril with 32xVLS...

Numbers hv its own advantage..

[𝐓𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 @Toxic__10_]

@kaskaide1 Not needed much in todays threat environment...

[𝐓𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 @Toxic__10_]

@someplaosint No doubt PLAAF will use its rocket force and extensive Land attack missiles to neutralize IAF bases but still IAF will not have so much difficulty to reach border from Southern india..

But PLAAF have to do so much efforts...

Also targeting PLAAF in central china isnt so tough.

[𝐓𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 @Toxic__10_]

@someplaosint Reality is china hv to deal with very harsh climate & terrains
Low base count in tibet
Its not hard for IAF to neutralize PLAAF bases in Tibet and push PLAAF back to central china
The moment PLAAF operation will go to central china PLAAF will never able to achieve air superiority

[𝐓𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 @Toxic__10_]

@SubhanJaved911 @Griezmenace If 500km range then it would not be for anti shipping....
Pakistan only possess Land attack capabilities which generally all navy possess....

Hitting a ship at 500km from submarine is currently impossible for PN in deep ocean...coz fr acquiring a target at 500km PN lack sensors

[𝐓𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 @Toxic__10_]

@SubhanJaved911 Just stick to the verifiable content... don't post anything random and unverifiable...

Content is good but try to deep dive into more technical stuffs....

[𝐓𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 @Toxic__10_]

@Thenameisind @kaskaide1 Exactly.... Baraks are key to protect S400

[𝐓𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 @Toxic__10_]

@Thenameisind @kaskaide1 Probelm with HQ series is their aerodynamics and those are never developed to take down supersonic threats...because west never brought supersonics into game...so aerodynamically HQ9 S400 and other SAMs are just tons of fuel and thats it...

Meanwhile western SAMs are beast

[𝐓𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 @Toxic__10_]

@Thenameisind @kaskaide1 We all know whY S400 failed in Rus-Ukr war...

Also american systems and their planning + their support aircrafts have unmatched networking to neutralize S400 in open field... not integrated like in mailand russia...

So thats different problem...

[𝐓𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 @Toxic__10_]

@ODA_Foxtrot Bro fact is fact... JF17 have issues...

And Tejas MK1A is more potent anyday than JF17B3....

[𝐓𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐜𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 @Toxic__10_]

@kaskaide1 @Thenameisind U need to study a bit more about aerodynamics of majority of Chinese SAMs..
Thry are all built on same aerodynamics like of russians.. and they aren't suited to deal with supersonics forget about hypersonics.
Only some recent SAMs are built totally different from russian design