@bunquere@casareilly Darren, you win. I concede and I'm out of here for good. real talk though: all the best pal. it was a good laugh at least, even if we disagreed about basically every single point hahahaha. good luck friend
@bunquere man. i showed you the image. you can find the site in the image on the wayback machine yourself. i am not doing things for you anymore, waste of energy.
@bunquere let me just put this in bullet points:
1. his hand: obliterated
2. his backpack, inside of which the device was: oh, there's a fragment of it.
come off it...
@bunquere nah nah, you said "in the foyer" 1000 were injured, then quickly removed "in the foyer". because you realised when you actually looked it up. mate. it HASN'T been proven in court. the only thing proven is the relation of the brother to the 'proven bomber'. total sham trial.
@bunquere you have disproven nothing I've put forward. tbh I am not even theorising, you are. I am pointing out physical impossibilities and logical inconsistencies and then you put forward a theory
@bunquere see, what happens on reddit, land of dunces, is that when people can't answer you they either say nothing or downvote everything else you say. still my points remain unchallenged. try to challenge any of them
@bunquere hey man. sorry I've been bit busy. did you miss me? sure, here is the link, feel free to try to address any of the five points I made (only one was attempted by anybody) https://t.co/nZIpnm9cAa
@bunquere man... you know the inquest isn't even finished yet. your lack of knowledge on this event concerns me. do you want to have a few rounds of golf some Sunday and talk about it. no hxmo I promise.
@bunquere well, his father (Abedi's) stated his son was never in Libya, where the photo is alleged by papers to have been taken, so you can believe him or not, I don't know what to believe.