bitcoin:native
Aggro shorts piling in late at a swing low being heavily absorbed by passive bids - all that effort with no reward to push further down
Its a range until proven otherwise
bitcoin:native
Aggro shorts piling in late at a swing low being heavily absorbed by passive bids - all that effort with no reward to push further down
Its a range until proven otherwise
Yeah no way around that unfortunately, don't let it discourage these posts I look forward to more.
Taleb has a quote “More data – such as paying attention to the eye colours of the people around when crossing the street – can make you miss the big truck."
Question for you, how do you find the balance of taking in all this information and still being able to execute without missing the " big truck "
As someone who loves trading technicals
I think learning about markets via technicals (like I did) is one of the worst ways to start
It’s a rigid framework where grown men argue with each other about the exact Japanese name for a specific candlestick or a box they’ve drawn on an arbitrary time frame
It doesn’t teach you the foundations - why markets move, different types of participants, microstructure, order types and their impact, perps vs spot, and all that stuff - market ‘plumbing’ as a category
One of the biggest issues with being hyperfocused on technicals is that they don’t teach you principles and market effects
Most technical setups can be decomposed into broad buckets which are well-established (trend, mean reversion, momentum, order flow / price impact, vol clustering etc.)
A lot of technical analysis is an often unknowing attempt to map those broad market effects into a recognisable pattern
But even a technical-first view is better served by understanding the underlying market effect first and then decomposing it, as opposed to focusing on the specific pattern without ever looking at what’s happening under the hood
“This type of triangle tends to go up” is a lot less useful than “this type of flow tends to resolve higher over N time frame”, even if you use the same triangle to identify it
Another example: if you’re drawing a support level and buying it, you’re assuming some version of buyers being more aggressive than sellers in that area over a given time frame and predicting a higher price as a result - but what does that mean?
Shorts closing / taking profit, allowing for mean reversion? Aggressive sellers being absorbed by passive buyers? Some price insensitive buyer predictably stepping in at a value area? Sellers getting margin called and forcibly trading at bad prices/causing a dislocation? Clustering of orders creating some sort of imbalance? And so on.
There’s definitely a risk of overthinking this stuff, and you can make money from charts alone
But if you haven’t thought about the underlying market effects and ‘plumbing’ for your setups you’ll likely be stuck in rigid pattern matching that doesn’t generalise and isn’t subject to deeper investigation and more nuanced application
Even if your main lens remains TA-focused, there is no harm in understanding the stuff you’re trading on a product level (eg perp contract specs, OI, funding, mark/last/index etc) and on a foundational level (why and how markets move)
Especially now that you can jam this stuff into an LLM and keep saying “dumb it down” until you get it, no excuse not to do your homework
This is something I really wish I did much earlier in my trading life, so hopefully it resonates with a fellow trader stuck in TA psychosis spending his mum’s credit card on a fourth Udemy candlestick course
Anyway GM
B Shape + significant volume
Open interest rising, cvd declining
On lower tf price then needs to respect that level
Ideally Spot cvd to then step in with strength
^ tracking this at a key level is important otherwise it’s more noise then it signal.
Prior to this, market regime and context has to be identified to determine whether we are in a
Pro trend vs counter trend environment on the relevant time frames
Says the man who funded Trump to the tune of some $300 million to get him elected to trigger the mayhem that now engulfs the world. He's still trying to divide and rule you because that's his job while answering to the very network behind the open border agenda in Europe that has led to horrors in Ireland and elsewhere.
Meanwhile, he directs your attention away from his AI/digital, data centre, hive mind, surveillance, agenda constantly advanced by him and his billionaire mates like Peter Thiel and co. The man's a monumental fraud and he's playing you. So is Robinson, the promotor of the Israeli government - the very people behind the open borders in Europe.