@NeilHatten@DrShayPhD Why would Jesus need to give them authority to forgive on a personal level? That's something anybody can do at any time and wouldn't need to be said.
This interpretation also makes the retention part of this authority/permission quite strange.
@MusicRobbies@DrShayPhD No, the Catholic interpretation harmonizes all of these perfectly
It would be you who is unclear on mediation, because it creates a conflict with at least James & John, with the only resolution being requiring them to mean something entirely different than what they plainly say
@MusicRobbies@DrShayPhD Seems unlikely, because it requires you to claim that John 20:22-23 doesn't say what it clearly says.
Furthermore, this position would render James's instruction to confess to one another improper at best and sinful at worst.
John 20:22โ23
> "And when he had said this, he breathed on them and said to them, โReceive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven them; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained.โ"
Bonus: James 5:16
> "Therefore confess your sins to one another, and pray for one another, that you may be healed. The prayer of a righteous man has great power in its effects."
@Brumairian Indeed. Protestant men's groups sometimes have a confessional aspect to them, but it's typically scoped to a certain category of sin.
Confessing to a priest is by far the best implementation for the soul and for human psychology.