⛈️ The All Weather Income Portfolio Outperformed the Indexes Today
📉 $SPY: -2.60%
📉 $QQQ: -4.77%
📉 All Weather Income Portfolio: -1.49%
💰 Avg Yield: 16.3%
Built to Generate Income Through Any Market Cycle.
It might not be exciting, but neither is losing money.
Is $250K Enough to Escape the 9-to-5?
3-Fund Setup:
$BLOX + $GIAX + $GPIQ = $64,825/yr
4-Fund Setup:
$BLOX + $GIAX + $GPIQ + $NVII = $73,531/yr
5-Fund Setup:
$BLOX + $GIAX + $GPIQ + $NVII + $CHPY = $81,475/yr
Would You Walk Away From Your 9-to-5 With One of These Setups? 👇
HE FRICKIN DID IT AGAIN
DONALD TRUMP KEEPS TELLING YOU HOW TO GET RICH
SO FAR HE CALLED:
$INTC AT $20 → +600%
$DELL AT $230 → +90%
$NOW AT $88 → +50%
NOW HE’S CALLING:
$NOK AT $15
“NOKIA IS A GREAT COMPANY”
HAVE YOU LEARNED YOUR LESSON YET?
President Trump quite literally just gave you a guide how to become rich off the stock market in 2026…
Last time he did this was with:
~ $MU at $372 which ran +161.02% to $971+
~ $DELL at $118 which ran +255.93% to $420+
Now he’s telling you to buy these 3 stocks.
$ARM at $353
$NOK at $14
$IBM at $297
Don’t miss these next runners…
You’re waiting around for a 3% raise on your salary.
You can buy yourself a raise instead.
Most people don’t even know that these funds exist.
$KSLV 50k = $750 per month
$BLOX 50k = $1,500 per month
$CHPY 50k = $1,600 per month
$NVII 50k = $1,750 per month
📜 Following the 4% Rule:
$1M Portfolio = $40K/Year Income
OR
$250K Portfolio = $50K/Year Income
(20% Yield)
One approach requires selling shares for income.
The other focuses on collecting cash flow while you hold.
Which approach do you prefer? 🤔
The 4% rule is the biggest lie ever told to the middle class.
Cashflow > withdraw til you die
$OVL $1 mil = $100,000 per year
$SOXY $1 mil = $120,000 per year
$KGLD $1 mil = $130,000 per year
$QQQI $1 mil = $140,000 per year
$BLOX $1 mil = $360,000 per year
The average car payment is $700.
$25,000 in $NVII will pay enough each month to cover that and still have money left over.
The best part? It outperforms NVIDIA.
Just started a brand new position in my long-term portfolio! $SPCI 👀🚀
This ETF is definitely one of the more interesting ones I have added!
• Focused on the SPACE industry 🛰️
• Weekly income strategy 💸
• Current distribution rate: 23%+
Anyone else have this one?
🚨BREAKING: NVIDIA WILL NOW PAY YOU OVER $22,000 A YEAR TO HOST A MINI AI DATA CENTER IN YOUR HOME.
Here's how it works:
A startup called Span (with NVIDIA GPUs + homebuilder Pulte) just launched a program that installs a "node" outside your house, the size of an AC unit.
What's inside one box:
→ 16x NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell GPUs
→ 4x AMD EPYC server CPUs
→ 3TB of memory
→ a 15kWh whole-home backup battery
That's $200k+ of hardware sitting next to your air conditioner. You own none of it.
The deal for homeowners:
→ Free install (new builds first)
→ Span pays your electricity AND internet bills
→ You pay them one flat fee (~$150/mo)
→ Net savings can hit thousands a year
It runs on the "stranded power" your home never uses. The average 200-amp house wastes ~40% of its capacity. They're turning that into compute.
The vision is wild: Span says 8,000 of these nodes = a 100MW data center, but 5x cheaper and 6x faster to deploy. No new power plants. No 4-7 year grid delays.
AI demand is breaking the grid. Their fix? Skip the mega data center. Build it across thousands of suburban garages instead.
100-home pilot drops Fall 2026. Full rollout 2027.
The AI buildout just moved into your backyard.
Hyperliquid is being treated like the cleanest up only narrative in crypto and I want to add some nuance here. To be clear, this is not Luna. Luna was a closed loop algorithmic peg with no real revenue. Hyperliquid has real fees from real users, a genuinely best in class product, a dominant share of onchain perps volume, and a team that has shipped relentlessly. The bull case is real. I'm not dismissing it. I just don't think the risks are getting the airtime they deserve.
I called Luna a ponzi here in 2021 around $50 and got absolutely hammered on the tl for daring to suggest anything negative about it as it ran to $120 before it vaporized to $0 within days. Very similar to yesterday when I simply said HL does not have remarkable tokenomics and got piled on for it. Being early on structural risk often looks wrong for a long time. And Luna was not just a retail rug. It roped in 3AC, Galaxy, Delphi, Hashed. Sophisticated money held the bag right alongside everyone else.
Here is what I see with Hyperliquid. 97% of fees buy back HYPE. That sounds incredible, and in an active perps bull market it absolutely is. But fees come from perp volume, volume comes from people chasing the token, and the token is held up by buybacks funded by that same volume. Every leg moves together. It's a functional flywheel. And in the other direction every leg turns at once.
However, nobody can tell you how much of the volume is organic either. If buybacks pump the token and the chart pulls in size and size funds buybacks, you cannot cleanly separate real activity from reflexive activity onchain. It doesn't mean the volume is fake. It just means you cannot prove how much of it isn't.
Then the supply side. Only 25% circulates. Team and foundation together hold roughly 30% (23% team plus the foundation allocation which is essentially team with extra steps). Buybacks absorb about 90 million of unlocks a month. Actual pressure is closer to 400 million plus. Revenue keeps growing at a real clip, which is the whole bull case, but it has to roughly 4x just to keep price flat through vesting.
Then the part nobody wants to touch. 31 validators, foundation controls the supermajority of stake, closed source binary, an assistance fund holding billions that we are simply told has no private key, on a chain the team built and runs. A lot of the business is regulatory arbitrage. Offshore venue, no KYC, users that shouldn't be using it are all over it. The founder is in DC right now precisely because everyone knows this. SBF was in DC lobbying for the DCCPA right up until FTX collapsed. Do Kwon was meeting Korean regulators before Terra blew up. Doesn't mean Jeff is anything like them.
And to be clear, none of this means price stops going up. This is the part that matters for traders. Reflexive setups run for a long time, sometimes years. Luna ran from $5 to $120 while plenty of smart people screamed about the structure. HYPE can absolutely do the same. The flywheel is real while it's spinning, and standing in front of it is a great way to underperform.
Just know what you're actually holding. Trade the tape, respect the trend, but don't fall in love and confuse a beautiful reflexive setup with a riskless cash machine. We have seen structures like this before and it tends to end the same way for usually the same reasons.