Niko🇫🇮

Curious guy, working in construction and ready to rock. #UFOTwitter 🛸

[Willy Sam @wouilisam]

🚨 Lue Elizondo révèle enfin la face SOMBRE des OVNIS

Je viens de lire la très longue interview de Lue Elizondo dans Liberation Times.

Elle va faire bondir ceux qui n'ont pas écoutés ses interviews passées mais ce côté sombre est déjà connu de ceux qui s'intéressent au sujet.

Il commence par dire qu’il n’y a plus de retour en arrière possible sur la levée du secret (disclosure).

C’est lui qui a lancé le train et il en assume toute la responsabilité :

"Je savais qu'il arriverait un moment où il n'y aurait plus de retour en arrière. N'ayez aucun doute là-dessus. Je suis conscient d'avoir lancé cette conversation, pour le meilleur ou pour le pire."

"J’ai lancé ce projet et c’est à moi qu’il incombe d’aller jusqu’au bout."

"L’histoire se souviendra de moi de deux façons : soit comme d’un patriote, soit comme du plus grand méchant de l’histoire… et tout ce que je peux faire, c’est espérer et prier chaque jour pour avoir pris la bonne décision".

Lue Elizondo explique que la vraie révélation ne sera pas juste "Il y à des ovnis et des intelligences non humaines".

Le choc le plus violent sera ce que ça dit sur nous, les humains. On a toujours cru qu’on était le centre de tout, les maîtres de la planète, le sommet de l’évolution. Il dit que notre égo va prendre une claque monumentale.

"Nous allons continuer à présenter des preuves qui remettront absolument en question certaines idées et convictions actuelles sur l'humanité et peut-être même sur notre évolution".

De quoi parle t-il ?

Et bien, pendant l’AATIP, il s'occupait du versant "technologique" du phénomène OVNI mais les biologistes et immunologistes de l’équipe étaient convaincus qu’il y eu une interférence dans l’évolution humaine à un moment du passé (génome génétique modifié ou muté intentionnellement ou d'une quelconque influence)

Il se pose la question :

"Si c’est vrai, dans quelle mesure on contrôle vraiment notre destin ?
Sommes-nous prédestinés à être le singe de compagnie de quelqu’un d’autre "

" [...] sommes-nous des acteurs de cette histoire, ou des instruments d’une lutte que nous ne comprenons pas [entre plusieurs intelligences non humaines (NHI)] ?"

Il parle de la possibilité qu’on ait une ascendance commune avec certaines NHI, ou que la vie "alien" ait évolué ici même sur Terre. Bref, on n’est peut-être pas si "naturels" ou indépendants qu’on le croit.

Il se demande quel rôle on nous a fait jouer et surtout si aux yeux d'une NHI, une sorte d'intelligence artificielle sans émotions, on a encore une utilité quelconque et si nous ne serions pas devenus gênant.

Il fait réference, sans le dire, au livre dont il recommande la lecture depuis des années : Chains of the Sea. (Paru sous le titre "Le fini des mers" en France. Dans l’histoire, des extraterrestres arrivent mais ils se fichent royalement des humains. Ils traitent avec d’autres intelligences non humaines présentes sur Terre depuis la nuit des temps mais invisibles aux yeux des humains) et une IA, et nous on est juste… là, insignifiants, inutiles, transparents. Et à la fin, le sort de l'humanité est scellé.

Cela me fait penser également à ce dit Spielberg pour son film Disclosure Day : ce n’est pas un film sur les aliens, c’est un film sur ce que nous sommes vraiment, nous les humains.

Lue Elizondo répète régulierement qu'il faut que l'on s'occupe de nos proches, et qu'on leur disent qu'on les aime.

Rappelez-vous ce qu'à dit Tom DeLonge après un briefing :

"Je n’ai pas dormi pendant trois nuits"

Il disait que ce qu’on lui avait montré était bien plus perturbant que ce qu’il imaginait, avec cette idée que ces êtres sont là depuis toujours et qu’ils ont un lien profond avec nous.

Il y a énormément d'informations dans cette interview et sur des choses moins sombres, plus terre à terres, sur le processus en cours, des pistes à explorer et des scoops et une petite pointe d'optimisme.

Je vous propose de lire la suite et de me dire ce que vous en pensez 👇

https://t.co/qupYFAwohm

[UAP Juan @planethunter56]

Couple key points from Lue Elizondo's speaking event in Dallas last night (together with Rep. Burlison);

1. Trump’s deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller called Burlison to discuss amnesty for those on the program . Burlison proposed a 60 day window to come forward.

2. Asked why Lue said to spend time with your family, and if there is a coming calamity, he dodged the question and pontificated about parenting.

Regarding 1, that's plenty of time for someone like David Grusch to literally rip the proverbial bandaid off.

And regarding 2, let me quote Sarah Connor in T2: "The future has not been written. There is no fate but what we make for ourselves." Unless, the all seeing Eye has "looked" ahead...

Info via @JiggyNutt

[UFO/UAP News @uap_news]

AMNESTY FOR UAP WHISTLEBLOWERS? 🛸

At Lue Elizondo’s event in Dallas last night, Rep. Burlison revealed he discussed a potential amnesty plan with White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller.

The proposal: A 60-day window for individuals with insider UAP information to safely come forward.

[James Fox @jamescfox]

I’m extremely excited to announce something today that I’ve been quietly working on with Leslie Kean, @RepEricBurlison, @RepLuna, @RepMoskowitz and others for an unprecedented direct plea to @POTUS regarding specific files as well as other UAP Disclosure-related legislation.

PUSH FOR UAP (UFO) TRANSPARENCY INTENSIFIES AS MEMBERS OF CONGRESS AND WHISTLEBLOWERS CALL FOR RELEASE OF GROUNDBREAKING, CONCLUSIVE FILES https://t.co/FWZ3Au0aR2

[Dan Warren @HeyLukOverThere]

“I can say through my experience that we are absolutely not alone in this universe. The biggest thing that concerns me with UAP is the national security concern. It’s the unknown. It’s the fact that this technology does stuff that we can’t do. And if we can’t figure out what it is or what it wants, or what it’s being used for, that keeps me up at night… and the idea that we’re behind the power curve. We want to be able to maintain the cutting-edge technology and the advantage here in the United States so that we can sleep comfortably at night and feel the safety of what the American government has provided.” - Brett Feddersen in Age of Disclosure
@BrettJFeddersen

[Alex Boge @alexboge]

Just watched the final trailer for Spielberg's Disclosure Day and I have to hand it to whoever ran that writers room. This is what happens when you treat r/UFOs as a focus group.

Roswell crash? Check.
The coverup? Check.
The aliens are still here? Check.
Jets chasing UFOs? Check.
UFO appearing out of a cloud? Check (h/t Independence Day)
Little gray-ish guys? Check.

Feels like they scraped every viral UFO X thread, sorted by engagement, and built a screenplay out of the top twenty. And not just the hardcore believers, they're going after the broad casual "I mean, SOMETHING is going on, right?" middle. Maximum addressable market for the dopamine hit of "what if everything you were told was wrong is actually right."

Then the masterstroke: Spielberg himself appears on screen to ask, "wouldn't it be amazing if people discovered that everything they believed was actually true?"

Yes Steven. It would. Validation feels incredible. You're not selling a movie. You're selling a hug.

Whether any of it makes logical sense, whether the logistics are plausible, whether Roswell hasn't been thoroughly autopsied for 75 years, none of it matters. The product is the feeling, and the feeling is "you were right all along. You are special.”

Genuinely a masterclass in targeting a demographic. Going to be a blockbuster.

[DefenseScoop - @defensescoop.bsky.social @DefenseScoop]

MITRE moves to comply with lawmaker’s request for UAP records and assets dating back to 1930 | Brandi Vincent reports:
https://t.co/c8rASVw6jj

[Mark Christopher Lee @Thekingofufos]

🛸 BREAKING UFO DROP — Jesse Watters just unloaded on Fox:
Trump says more files are coming (if the deep state doesn’t get him first) 👀
New docs reveal:
• UFOs swarming military sites
• U.S. fighter jet shooting one down over Lake Huron
• Orange orbs lighting up the sky — seen up close by a senior intel officer in a military helicopter
Pentagon flat-out admits: We cannot explain these objects.
More coming. The lid is cracking.
What’s really flying in our skies? Drop your theories below 👇
(Quote-tweet this 🔥) https://t.co/318ituiuDT
#UFO #UAP #Disclosure #Trump2024

[UAP James @UAPJames]

Trump Administration is soliciting advice about how to tell the public that “We Are Not Alone”

White House officials are consulting with religious leaders and seeking advice on the ontological shock of Disclosure, per NewsNation’s Ross Coulthart.

[Dan Warren @HeyLukOverThere]

@EricBurlison @SilvaRecord And here's a recreation of the event series ⬇️⬇️⬇️

[John Greenewald, Jr. @theblackvault]

@realannapaulina https://t.co/UBgoGolMRd

[Disclosure Party @disclosureorg]

Fox News highlighted recent FOIA litigation from @disclosurefound and the release of 300 pages of classified UFO documents from the NSA.

"We're still digging through them, but some of this stuff is shocking. According to the docs, back during the Cold War, the Soviets scrambled 13 MiG fighter jets to chase down one UFO. Another time jets were deployed to hunt down 23 UFOs flying at 70,000 feet."

[UAP James @UAPJames]

Steven Spielberg: “I believe the cosmos is teeming with life… Is that life currently interacting with us?”

“When I made Close Encounters I thought, ‘Wouldn’t it be great if this could come true?’ With everything that’s happened from 1977 til today, I can now make Disclosure Day and say — ‘Isn’t it going to be wonderful when people realize after seeing this movie that everything is true, and has been true?’”

[Tim McMillan @LtTimMcMillan]

Some Little-Known Behind-the-Scenes History🧵:

“Chris Mellon knew folks in the SecDef front office and introduced us.”

Several years ago, I personally spoke with a former member of SecDef Mattis’s senior staff who confirmed that throughout early 2017 they had been formally briefed on ATTIP and UAP by @LueElizondo. I believe @jaystratton was also a part of those briefings. However, at the time we spoke Jay was still at ODNI and we did not discuss him.

The individual confirmed being shown videos and other information in a secure setting. They would not go into detail on what they were shown, aside from saying it seemingly defied conventional explanations. They never mentioned any requests for “material transfers.” But in fairness, I also never specifically asked about anything like that.

This person also told me they felt responsible for AATIP and the UAP issue never making it to SecDeF Mattis. They said this wasn’t because of any orchestrated “cover-up.” Rather, this all occurred in the early months of the Trump administration’s first term. Many new senior officials weren’t settled into their offices yet. According to them there were also several very pressing national security issues involving North Korea and Syria which took precedence.

Perhaps, the most fascinating part of our conversation was they recounted being stunned by the DoD’s initial public denials that AAWSAP/AATIP was involved in UAP investigations and Lue’s role.

This person said they went so far as to personally speak with DoD Public Affairs to express their displeasure that the information being released was patently false.

In response, they were effectively told by DoDPA that the public statements on AAWSAP/AATIP and Lue were formally accurate, but indeed functionally misleading.

Essentially, senior staff at OUSDI and OSDPA preferred to play a game of semantics as opposed to offering clarity, in hopes it would make the entire AATIP/UAP thing go away.

The PAO they spoke with, however, similarly expressed their disapproval of this approach.

*For context, this was pre-Susan Gough. Once Gough was assigned as the public affairs UAP-Czar, OSDPA coalesced around a unified UAP messaging strategy.

This included all DoD branches and components being required to route all UAP information to OSDPA/Gough.

Other non-DoD agencies, for example FBI, DHS, etc., also largely complied with this as well. Whether that was by formal executive directive or simply a good excuse to pass off UAP inquiries, I don’t know.

Component FOIA offices were also required to provide advance notice to OSDPA about upcoming UAP related FOIA releases.

In another private conversation, a former high-ranking Under Secretary, told me OSDPA’s messaging strategy was to be very cautious and risk-averse. Effectively, OSDPA would only comment on information that had already become publicly available via FOIA, in some instances leaks, or occasionally comments by former officials.

Candidly, the former Under Secretary said the goal was to convey the least amount of information, while still satisfying the requirement for public disclosure.

[Dan Warren @HeyLukOverThere]

🚨Declassified UAP encounter has "SHAKEN the Intelligence Community and Military"🚨
This is why @repericburlison wants you to dig into it!
Watch the recounting of the series of encounters ⬇️below⬇️ or read the official https://t.co/ofEMp2lbIB summary below!

Full report in post below.

Full Statement about UAP Sighting

This is an FBI 302 interview conducted with a senior US intelligence official regarding his first-hand account of a UAP encounter at a US military facility. USPER relayed to FBI agents that he and other federal and state personnel conducted searches to where orbs had been previously seen. After searching the area with a helicopter, they found a “super-hot” orb hovering over the ground. The orb is reported to have travelled for 20 miles at a speed too fast for the helicopter in pursuit. An additional “swarm” of lights were seen moving in all directions. A total of four or five additional orbs were seen shortly thereafter for a short time, flaring up and then down. This pattern of four or five orbs flaring up, then down continued over the next thirty minutes across the area.

The photos linked in the "Related Media" section are connected to a set of UAP encounters on a sensitive government testing installation in the Western US in 2025. These orb-like UAP were observed at various ranges by multiple, and in some cases simultaneous, government personnel and sensors. The linked narrative is an FBI-collected account from a senior U.S. intelligence community official who witnessed the UAP with the naked eye, while accompanied by two pilots under NVGs. Other pilots in separate aircraft, and ground-based observers with night vision, also witnessed UAP during the exercise. The photos of UAP underneath the helicopter are from this same set of observations, taken through night vision devices by ground-based personnel.

[Joe Murgia @TheUfoJoe]

😳 Luna: Kosloski Apologized for the Behavior of Kirkpatrick 😳

🚨🔥 This is HUGE and Deserves: Breaking News! 🔥🚨

Luna: "The new director of AARO [Jon Kosloski] met with myself and multiple members of Congress, recently...and apologized for the former director, Kirkpatrick, and how he behaved and engaged with Congress in regards to this information. Kirkpatrick did a number on their reputation, for sure."

(I'd love to get Kosloski to say this on camera or on the record and also confirm that he told @jamescfox that he can't part his hair without approval from DOD.)

~

@RepLuna: CIA Director John, "Ratcliffe actually was and is helpful on this issue. When they first, actually, came into power with the new administration, I did meet with him directly, and he did tell me where to look. And with the help of [Trump], that was then released on who basically had authority over the files. So, that was something that was done months ago. So, to his credit, he's been actually very good on this issue. And remember, Ratcliffe was a member of House Oversight and was former ODNI, so, he's been good on this.

"The former AARO agency was awful. I think that they were intentionally put there to block, stonewall and suppress information. The new director of AARO met with myself and multiple members of Congress, recently, to introduce himself and apologized for the former director, Kirkpatrick, and how he behaved and engaged with Congress in regards to this information.

"So, I have said, publicly, that AARO, specifically, I don't think that it needs to be an office that's still in existence. I think that we can put that money better spent elsewhere. I say that because I had a great relationship with FBI, they were doing a great job researching this stuff, and also now the information is public. However - and this is nothing directed at the current director (Kosloski), I like the current director - but I just don't see the need for redundancy in these investigations if you have an agency (FBI) that's already stood up and doing this.

"And so, given the historical, you know, narrative that AARO created for itself under former leadership, I just think that they're cooked in regards to trust, and I think that that is better spent...time, energy spent elsewhere. And so, I appreciate their support, I know that they are working fully with the Pentagon, that they have been doing good, due diligence and follow-up in research. I just think that it's redundant at this point.

"But it doesn't mean that we won't work with them if that doesn't happen. Again, I have had a good conversation with the current director (Kosloski), recently, and so that's been a huge plus. And I will say that they have been working to get this information compiled at the DOW, ensuring that none of our tech is being released. So the files that you're seeing are not tech known to the U.S. government, it is stuff that we would consider an anomaly in UAP files."

(But if some of this stuff that's allegedly performing amazing maneuvers and can change the world with tech related to free energy or us being able to travel to distant stars, is being held back, that's a problem. I guess first things first, for now?)

Luna: "And they have ensured that no information regarding sensor data or the way that these things were being recorded, that could undermine and jeopardize national security, is being released in that. And so, they have been working with us. But man, Kirkpatrick did a number on their reputation, for sure."

Avi Loeb: "I met with Jon Kosloski, that Representative Luna mentioned, a year ago, and also most recently I spoke with him. He, I asked him whether they have access to all the data, and he claimed that they do. But I don't know what he doesn't know. That's quite possible that there is compartmentalized data within corporations or the government.'

(I do not believe AARO has access to any of the Legacy program data on crash retrievals of NHI craft and bodies, IF that stuff exists.)

Loeb: "And, you know, they're trying to figure out from limited data what past reports are, and on many occasions they just don't have enough data. So, you know, obviously we can go back in time, but another approach would be to collect new data with a focus on this mission of figuring out these objects, just to make sure that these are not Chinese drones (Luna laughs), you know, hovering around the U.S.. You know, this is important, this is a serious matter."

Luna: "I think the Japanese government just came out and had kind of made a reference to UAP stuff, and so we're following up with them as well to see what they have. I just recently asked, you know, the government of El Salvador if they had anything. And so, you know, we have friends in high places around the world, and so we're kind of following up.

"But all this to say that, look, you should be able to ask questions without facing stigma, and when you have people intentionally telling you don't look there, you can't know, you can't...I mean, that's a problem. So we just want transparency. If we're wrong, we're happy to admit that we're wrong. But the fact is, is that the evidence is not showing that we're wrong (laughs)."

Loeb: "Right. And I had exchanged with high-level leaders within Japan about a year ago, and in fact, one of the senior members of the Galileo Project is now a professor in Japan. So, hopefully we'll learn what they're seeing."

[Mike Lee @BasedMikeLee]

With all due respect, no federal agency—not even the CIA—gets to tell the Senate what questions it may ask in a duly convened legislative hearing.

The CIA is facing serious accusations, and telling the Senate it can’t look into these issues only heightens legitimate suspicions.

@CIADirector needs to appear before the Senate immediately to respond in public to these and other serious accusations about the agency he’s leading.

[Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell @JeremyCorbell]

I can confirm and affirm, that this article from the @nypost is 100% accurate - and that there’s a metric fuck-ton more to be told about this story. The “Alien Girls” are ON THE CASE!!! 👽👯‍♀️

And… “Let history reflect that Sean Kirkpatrick is a documented liar, deep state shill, and having a very bad day. He was lying to the American people and intimidating witnesses.”
- @RepLuna

So there’s that 😉🫡 🇺🇸

https://t.co/hoygzRZlT6

[UAP James @UAPJames]

CIA Whistleblower who led ODNI Director’s Initiative Group (DIG) investigation into UAP testifies that the CIA illegally monitored DIG investigators’ communications with whistleblowers

“These were Americans being spied upon illegally while executing duties directed by the President.”

James Erdman III testified that a new Church Committee may be necessary to address “CIA refusal to comply with lawful oversight” and emphasized the importance of whistleblowers.

“Whistleblowers are indispensable agents for reform.”

Erdman’s testimony came today at the Senate Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee hearing on COVID-19 origins.

[Alex Caprariello @alcaprari23]

I'll be speaking with Reality Check's @rosscoulthart this afternoon around 6:40ET. We're going to dive into the latest UAP videos, pictures and documents.

What questions do you still have after viewing everything that came out yesterday? I'll ask Ross tonight!!