ETA's big claim: Voting machines started "flipping votes" after counting ~250 ballots.
They say this pattern is "inexplicable", and that the patterns in the scatterplots they produced from Clark County data are "statistically impossible"
@MadTyAgain You said it: can't argue with facts.
Here are the facts, in the form of an interactive gameified data exploration website I just made:
https://t.co/sff7h1hkcz
Have fun!
So much of these supposed "statistical" proofs of election fraud are totally disconnected from reality.
They start with the assumption that every place is the same, every party is the same, every candidate is the same, and then find mundane differences to be "surprised" by.
There is more Trump-Rosen than Harris-Brown votes, but that's not surprising.
Rosen is an anti-immigration Democrat, she has real appeal to Trumpers.
Brown, anti-choice texan carpetbagger, had no chance with Democrats or a public who also voted for a right to abortion 65-35.
@RabMeir@grok@ChaosAgent_42@ETA_Org How about you explore the data yourself instead of talking to a dumb robot about it?
I made a website about Clark County that's more complete and honest than Election Truth Alliance, check it out:
https://t.co/sff7h1hkcz
A lie circles the world while the truth ties its shoes. This site took a while because testing hypotheses takes more time than inventing scary stories to tell about odd-looking charts.
But statistics literacy matters. Hopefully this helps people spot BS in the future.
I built this site because it saddens me when well-meaning people fall for statistical deception.
The interactive visualizations let you test every claim yourself. You can even run the election backwards.
Play with it. Simulate more scenarios. See why ETA arguments fall apart.