Burt

[Burt @Trexnixon]

@sultrysanguine What did I do this time!?

[Carolinas Finest @Carolinas_942]

If you don’t know what this is, you aren’t allowed to talk to me about the minimum wage.

[Burt @Trexnixon]

https://t.co/UbMLz4HiW5

[JerryRigEverything @ZacksJerryRig]

@PhillyD are you voting for Hilary Clinton though? Her name keeps coming up.

[Burt @Trexnixon]

@its_classact You gonna stream it?

[Burt @Trexnixon]

@Keon5500_ @WaifuAnimeManga

[Burt @Trexnixon]

@ripley19x9 @Nate_Hlggerz @heart_fulll @MichaelSteidel @janschjetne @esjesjesj Nah, it's an ideology. Locke and Marx are both men that wrote their own opinion on the observation of society (not a natural phenomenon).
Now I'm more of a Locke guy than a Marx guy for sure but to call his philosophy "as much a fact as gravity" is ridiculous.

[Burt @Trexnixon]

@ripley19x9 @heart_fulll @Nate_Hlggerz @MichaelSteidel @janschjetne @esjesjesj "as far as I'm concerned".
Yeah man, it's called an opinion. Those are worth talking about but they aren't facts so please don't treat them like they are.

[Burt @Trexnixon]

@ripley19x9 @Nate_Hlggerz @heart_fulll @MichaelSteidel @janschjetne @esjesjesj No I don't think that's how it works. Philosophy and science are not the same thing my guy. The fact that you think one man's writings from the 17th century as in stone as gravity kinda tells me enough though.

[Burt @Trexnixon]

@ripley19x9 @heart_fulll @Nate_Hlggerz @MichaelSteidel @janschjetne @esjesjesj Let's say that's true and boil this down so we can all move on; do you think John Locke's philosophy on how to define human rights is the only is the only one? Or do you think him so infallible that all other philosophies are immediately wrong without question?

[Burt @Trexnixon]

@ripley19x9 @heart_fulll @Nate_Hlggerz @MichaelSteidel @janschjetne @esjesjesj Do you think John Locke's take itself as "a force greater than nature itself" or did you just really want to butcher the quote to prove a point.
Also fun side note, you were right this locke guy has some good ideas... Who knew.

[Burt @Trexnixon]

@ripley19x9 @alt_rag3 @janschjetne @esjesjesj

[Burt @Trexnixon]

@ripley19x9 @heart_fulll @Nate_Hlggerz @MichaelSteidel @janschjetne @esjesjesj Nah, we don't have to look at the concept of "human rights" from the sole lens of one late 1600s philosopher. I'm pretty sure it's been written about by many others and it's still debated to this day. In fact I think the UN had a discussion about the topic recently. Weird right?

[Burt @Trexnixon]

@ripley19x9 @alt_rag3 @janschjetne @esjesjesj I mean *technically* humans can be food. So even that terrible faith argument that ignores the example sentences in that same image is wrong. But honestly I don't think me trying to teach you what the word intrinsic means is going to get us anywhere.

[Burt @Trexnixon]

@ripley19x9 @theFrostmind @MichaelSteidel @janschjetne @esjesjesj Because I don't agree with you on the idea that food is a basic right? No, I think we just disagree.

[Burt @Trexnixon]

@ripley19x9 @heart_fulll @Nate_Hlggerz @MichaelSteidel @janschjetne @esjesjesj Re read everything.
I feel like I've got a pretty solid Idea, thanks for your opinion though.

[Burt @Trexnixon]

@ripley19x9 @alt_rag3 @janschjetne @esjesjesj You're right my guy, food is clearly not "essential" to our being because our bodies don't"naturally create it."
Words are so difficult, thank you for helping.

[Burt @Trexnixon]

@ripley19x9 @alt_rag3 @janschjetne @esjesjesj And you don't think the basic requirement of food doesn't line up with that ideal?
Food isn't "intrinsic to our being"?

[Burt @Trexnixon]

@ripley19x9 @heart_fulll @Nate_Hlggerz @MichaelSteidel @janschjetne @esjesjesj If you can't see my point from that one I don't know how to help you further.