In any DeFi leverage positions, liquidations are a big problem, washing out entire capital on a quick wick down, even on low-risk trades.
The thing is, markets can be so unpredictable, and things like that happen very often.
But @hylo_so asks: who liquidation
It's a very different way to trade leverage.
this is basically leverage made simple and much less risky with xAssets that you can buy, hold, or sell anytime.
Netflix in the US costs about $24.99 per month. A 30-day month has roughly 2.6 million seconds. That means you are effectively paying around $0.00001 per second of access.
If pricing were truly usage-based and you watched 2 hours per day, you'd consume about 216,000 seconds per month. That would cost roughly $2 instead of $25. Netflix won't adopt this model but the math shows something important: ultra-granular pricing radically changes economics. Well it could be used for content streaming or pay for what you watch but yeah... lets move on... my point is a bit different
For Agentic commerce nanopayments are critical
Agents can execute thousands of transactions per day ie, API calls, compute usage, data access. If each transaction carries even a small onchain fee, margins disappear quickly. At 5,000 transactions daily with a $0.005 fee, that's $25 per day and $750 per month in overhead purely from gas.
@circle Gateway Nanopayments removes it by batching settlement. Users deposit USDC once, sign payments offchain, and Gateway settles net balances in bulk. Because thousands of micro-payments are aggregated into a single onchain transaction, sub-cent payments even $0.000001 become economically viable.
In an agentic era, agentic commerce requires high-frequency, ultra-low-value transfers without batched, gas-free micro-settlement, that is max efficient.
Now combine that with execution environments like @arc that are optimizing finality and high-frequency coordination. Fast execution without efficient value transfer is incomplete. Efficient value transfer without fast execution is also incomplete.
Agentic commerce requires both.
With it, usage-based pricing becomes more natural.
Built FairSplit on Arc and honestlyโฆ using test USDC as gas just feels right
That changed the dev experience completely.
Now you can split bills with:
โข direct USDC transfers
โข confidential transfers
โข near-instant testnet settlement
Arc transactions feel ridiculously smooth
@arc@circle@jerallaire@samconnerone@silencexlm@0xmikef@bobbilee
Checkout: https://t.co/KOmGqeGZjY
Been building Fairsplit, a USDC bill-splitting app that works directly with wallet addresses.
Each participant can choose: normal transfer or confidential transfer.
Confidentiality powered by @0xfairblock
Checkout here: https://t.co/56LG6v9Zkv
We are sooo cooking... Our @basemalayali community's first Dapp on @base
Checkout here: https://t.co/NwMLr8rLn5
Reminder:
- Fairsplit is on testnet, so try it on 2 testnet wallets...
- Always initialize confidential wallet and convert USDC to cUSDC before you tryout confidential transfers
- Confidential transfers take approximately 1 minute to finalize
and Enjoy testing based chads
Tagging all based chads I know:
@buildonbase@coinbase@brian_armstrong@jessepollak@CoinbaseDev@0xyoussea@berkay_secil@BasedIndia@baseposting