Before I left Islam, I was debating a Sudanese Christian who challenged me to name one good thing about Muhammad. Just one.
I thought: easy. We Muslims practically worship Muhammad as the greatest man who ever lived.
So I tried to recall good qualities, honesty, compassion, mercy, love, anything, any single story, and I couldn’t remember one.
So I went to Google and typed: “the qualities of the Prophet.”
Islamic websites came up, and I thought, good, now I’ll have plenty of examples for this guy.
I opened them and was stunned: even the Islamic websites offered no good qualities in the sense he’d challenged me to find.
They praised his courage in spreading Islam, his fighting of Allah’s enemies, his physical strength, and his strictness.
Not one of the qualities the man had asked for.
Even the famous mercy at Mecca, sparing the people who had supposedly persecuted him, turned out to be for strategic reasons.
And when I started digging into the Quran and the sira for myself, I found that he married a child, he took Safiyya, a Jewish woman, the same day he killed her father, her brother, and her husband, trading his companion Dihya seven other captives for her, and posting a guard by the tent in case she tried to avenge them while raping her.
He had the men of the Jewish tribe beheaded, down to boys checked for pubic hair.
He raided trade caravans and took other tribes’ treasures.
He lied and broke truces he asked for.
He slept with all of his 9 wives the same night.
He killed anyone who mocked him.
He recruited raiders with the promise of other cities’ women.
And when his own fighters hesitated to touch married captives, because their husbands were alive and watching, Muhammad told them it was fine because allah said so.
Even the pagans of Arabia had higher morality than he did.
Every one of these acts was stamped with Allah’s approval.
He even married his adopted son’s wife by divine decree.
And this is just the tip of the iceberg.
I left Islam when I met this disgusting man, a man who turned his qualities into a religion, transmitted it to every generation of Muslims since, and made himself the ceiling of their morality.
This is the man Mamdani wants you to learn from.
As usual, there is an immense amount of fake information circulating around Restore Britain’s immigration policy. I will spell it out. Read this, and let me know if you think it’s ‘nazism’, 'far-right' or whatever else…
Where would we start?
Illegal migrants. The entire illegal population will be removed. Man, woman and child. I don’t have to justify why. Restore Britain has published the most comprehensive deportation policy ever released in Britain.
They will all be removed. No excuses. We’ve detailed exactly how we will do that.
That is step one, along with the foreign criminals in our prisons. Don’t need to explain further.
Step two?
Legal migrants who can’t speak English, refuse to work, claim benefits, live in social housing, hate our way of life or even actively want to do us harm?
They go too - hopefully voluntarily. If not, they will be removed.
Dual national Islamists who want us dead? Strip them off their British citizenship and send them back to Pakistan or wherever else.
That will mean millions and millions of people will leave the country over the first parliament of a Restore Britain Government.
All done with drastic reductions of the number of people settling in the country, and I mean drastic. An almost entire border closure - immigration inwards will be in the thousands, not hundreds of thousands. Far more people will leave than arrive. The population will fall, drastically.
Ultra-high skilled migrants are welcome to fill the gaps until we can train our own. That, and foreign spouses of Brits from countries not on the ‘Red List’. That process will be simplified and made more affordable so that British men and women can build a life with their loved ones in our country.
That is positive immigration.
If their presence benefits the British people, that is acceptable. This is not complicated.
What is our ‘Red List’?
If a country is proven to supply us with sex pests, rapists, criminals and illegals? We will shut off immigration. Entirely. That's step three, all implemented concurrently.
Pakistan, Afghanistan, Eritrea, Sudan, Somalia to name a handful…
The asylum system will be abolished. Entirely. No more asylum seekers. Benefits for foreign nationals would be cancelled. Social housing currently filled with foreigners would be emptied for British families. This is all just common sense.
I have been very clear that I am uncomfortable with the rapidly changing demographics of our country following the impact of mass immigration - particularly the growing Islamic influence which continues to transform our communities.
Restore Britain will reverse the islamification of our country.
I make no apologies for that.
The process of obtaining British citizenship will change beyond recognition. We will not simply encourage foreign nationals to obtain a citizenship in order to access benefits.
Those numbers will be drastically reduced in the most extraordinary way.
Will any of this be particularly straightforward? No.
But we are publishing detailed policy laying out exactly how we will achieve this - our 'Red List' document is very much on the way...
This is the very top level. If you want to know more, please examine our 100+ page deportation policy document. With plenty more detail to come.
The media will abuse and harass me. So be it.
I want to do one thing and one thing only.
Put the British people first.
There is finally a political party that is dedicated to doing exactly that.
Restore Britain.
If you had trusted the settled science of the day, here is how it would have gone.
1890s: you dose the baby with Bayer's new cough syrup, the non-addictive alternative to morphine, marketed for children. It was heroin. They named it after the German for heroic.
1900s: you rub calomel teething powder on your infant's gums. It is a mercury compound, and it leaves a generation with pink disease. Swollen, peeling hands and feet, screaming for months, and some of them died.
1910s: you cook in Crisco, launched by a soap and candle company, because cottonseed oil is modern and lard is what your mother used. The process that made it solid produced trans fat, banned outright a century later.
1920s: you drink Radithor, certified radioactive water, on prescription. Eben Byers took fourteen hundred bottles for his vitality. His jaw was removed in pieces and he was buried in a lead coffin.
1930s: a chemist dissolves a new sulfa drug in diethylene glycol, which is antifreeze. It kills 107 people, mostly children, and only then does America give the FDA power to demand safety testing.
1940s: your doctor lights a Camel in the surgery. More doctors smoke them than any other brand, and the advert runs in the Journal of the American Medical Association, which sold him the page.
1950s: DDT is sprayed over your kitchen, your garden and your children at school. The man who found its insecticidal properties has already been given a Nobel Prize.
1960s: your wife takes thalidomide for morning sickness because it is remarkably safe. More than ten thousand children are born with missing and shortened limbs.
1970s: the country puts down the butter and picks up the margarine, on the instruction of the American Heart Association. The fat everybody switched to was banned in 2015 as unsafe at any level.
1980s: the fat comes out of everything and sugar goes back in to make it edible. Obesity begins a climb it has never come off.
1990s: your father is prescribed OxyContin, because fewer than one per cent get addicted. The company later pleads guilty to criminal misbranding, and the overdose count runs into hundreds of thousands.
2000s: you take Vioxx for your knee. It is pulled in 2004, and the FDA's own safety officer estimates tens of thousands of excess heart attacks.
Not one of those was fringe. Every one had a professional body, a literature and a man in a white coat standing behind it.
Nobody who followed that advice was stupid. They were obedient, to the most qualified people available.
Settled is a word about money. It means the questions stopped being funded, so they stopped being asked.
So which of today's instructions will your grandchildren read out in disbelief.
The oil washed in hexane and built into every cell you own. The statin that blocks the pathway making your hormones, to prevent one heart attack per hundred people. The injection where a third of the loss is muscle. The infant formula built out of vegetable oil.
All settled. None of it funded to be otherwise.
How caterpillar-to-butterfly evolved step-by-step:
Step 1: DNA mutation causes caterpillar to turn into goo in a shell.
Step 2: It died.
Since the DNA wasn't there yet to turn it into a butterfly, that's the end of the tale.
There is no evolutionary mechanism that can possibly explain why a caterpillar would turn to goo in a shell and reform into a completely different creature.
ALL the genetic instructions for how to do that must be programmed into the caterpillar's DNA from the beginning, or it doesn't work.
This is but one glaring example of how evolution cannot build complex biological systems.
Life demands Design.
Every atheist I've debated eventually lands here: if God is real, why can't we see him? I used to fumble this. Then I read 1 Timothy 1:17.
Paul is mid-argument about grace and his own conversion when he breaks suddenly into praise:
"Now to the King eternal, immortal, invisible, the only God, be honour and glory for ever and ever."
"Eternal," "immortal," and "the only God" make sense as praise. But invisible? We don't praise men for being unseen. Why does Paul list it as something as glorious as the majesty and immortality of God?
Unless invisibility is not a limitation. Unless it is out of gracious design.
Paul met the unmediated light of Christ on the road to Damascus, he was knocked into the dirt, and blind for three days. He knows what the alternative to invisible feels like. It produced collapse, not worship. His praise is a survivor's testimony.
When people ask for God to be visible, they don't understand what full divine visibility would actually require.
God is omnipresent in essence. Therefore, total divine visibility fundamentally requires omnipresent visibility.
If God reveals Himself to the fullest extent of His capacity, He must be visible everywhere, at all times.
In the room you closed the door to. In the moment you spent your life believing nobody was watching. A visible, omnipresent God is not majestic; He is psychologically catastrophic. Nobody wants this, not even the devout.
Look at Isaiah 6. The prophet sees merely the hem of God's garment filling the temple, not the full glory of God, just the overflow. His response? "Woe to me, I am undone." A partial glimpse unmade him completely.
God isn't after bland empirical agreement. James already ended that: the demons believe, and tremble.
Intellectual assent is a bar the devil clears daily.
God isn't running a census of the convinced; He is seeking genuine love. And genuine love requires genuine choice, which requires that the object of love not be overwhelming.
This is why women despise love bombing. A man who floods your psychological space until refusal becomes impossible isn't loving you, he is eliminating the conditions for love. The "yes" he extracts is engineered by exhaustion.
God does the exact opposite. He veils His glory precisely so that you retain the dignity of saying no. The love bomber makes himself so large that you have no choice. God makes Himself small enough that you do.
Which brings us directly to the Incarnation.
The Incarnation is God making Himself visible enough to be known, but small enough to be rejected without fuss.
It is the most precise solution to the most precise problem: God doesn't arrive as a sky-filling terror, but as a baby in a manger in a backwater town. You can walk past a carpenter from Nazareth. You cannot walk past the throne of Isaiah 6.
The Bible is already clear that every knee will bow, a day of compelled reality as certain as the sun. But God is not eager for a forced crowd. Right now, He is seeking the single, freely given return of a heart in love.
When an atheist asks why he cannot see God, he is asking a better question than he knows. The answer is not absence. The answer is restraint.
Now one can finally understand why Paul says INVISIBLE, and means it as highest acclaim. It is not a limitation, it is a mercy.
Third Reich propaganda dropped on the Allies, in English, accurately spelled out what was going on.
This didn't require prognostication, it merely required observation and repeating what the antiwhite scum said they were going to do.
We have all been mind-warred into believing nonsense for 80 years, when what was being done was obvious to anyone who paid attention, even back then.
These feebleminded little idiots are living in the distant past, back when communist instigators, insurgents, and saboteurs roused the rabble with slogans like "Workers of the world, Unite!" and "Long live the Dictatorship of the Proletariat!" Evidently, they style themselves as members of the American working class.
Here's a clue for you, kiddies: you don't pass. You clearly don't know rat scat from raisins about the working class or even what it feels like to work. You're a comical bunch of pathetic fuzz-brained patio pets who have obviously never done a hard day's physical labor in your sheltered, pampered lives.
The Bolsheviks would have taken one look at your childish faces, flabby bodies, and soft palms, instantly identified you as bourgeois parasites, total strangers to the hammer and sickle, and executed you on the spot, transforming you into manure for the sacred soil of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.
Be grateful that America has spared you what you're stupidly trying to bring back. If you succeed, you'll be the first to go. Don't let your alligator mouths run away with your Canary Mission butts lest you end up in a hole with a posthumous Darwin Award.
Under a Restore Britain Government, those rioting Moroccans on the streets of London last night would be immediately deported.
In truth, many would already have been shipped out prior to the rioting.
Enough is enough - a deep line needs to be drawn in the sand. Talk is weak. Britain needs to say no more, and mean it.
A Restore Britain Government, with the British people's approval, would put Vickrum Digwa to death.
Henry Nowak was stabbed by Digwa five times, including twice in the back of his legs, once in the face and a fatal wound to the chest.
Rather than calling an ambulance, Digwa filmed Henry.
Digwa gave the knife to his mother and it was found by police at their home along with more than 20 other weapons.
Keeping this savage alive serves nobody.
The police officers on the scene who allowed Henry to die will face criminal charges for gross negligence manslaughter.
Digwa's foreign family will be deported.
Laws will change, the country will change, everything will change.
Order will be restored, the law will be restored.
Britain will be restored.
"There will come a day when the power of the British state that concealed your atrocious crimes for so very long is turned against you. It will be swift. It will be brutal. It will be severe... We will show you the same mercy you showed our girls."
Restore Britain’s three major policy papers so far are on saving the British pub, mass deporting millions of illegal migrants and legalising lethal force to defend your family.
Sounds like a bloody good start to me.