Triny

Dev • NFTs • Memecoins

[Triny @TrinyDefi]

Y'all should check this game I built.
It's a companion Maze game with dungeon vibes.

@CompanionsWfit @Ivanaarch
I would really appreciate y'all thoughts on this game, play test and share your feedbacks. Thank you.

I would be releasing the 3d version later.

https://t.co/MSprXEIwLZ

[Mason @MasonWaltemyer]

🚨JUST IN- $NVDA is signing their own death warrant…

$NVDA if you fire @JensenHuang it will be the DUMBEST decision you’ll ever make. I want you to realize, every top engineer at your company will be following Jensen right over to $SPCX and $TSLA. That’ll go for your shareholders as well.

Jensen & Elon would then create an #AI conglomerate. Becoming your TOP competitor…

A Jensen & @elonmusk SUPERTEAM would ANNIHILATE any potential competition.

@grok what would this mean for $SPCX?

[Triny @TrinyDefi]

@Jennifer_Verse @Zunki_xyz @RokibahT @tox_ic007 @iamGravityArts @rolybliz @Oseken4 @asiskenn20 @0xepicartifacts @NovaLynxNFT @_RollinNolan @ChideraAni10173 @Cannabisking42 @Isabella_maxiy @EtherVortex1 @JAyobami76581 @OfureBless91740 @AdikeshYadav @S_t_ai @Nahidul7428 Thank you very much 😊

[Triny @TrinyDefi]

@Kelvinoyibo Gm ultra dad 😁

[H0ld.sats @Kelvinoyibo]

gm

nfts

[Karoline Gosling @KarolineGosling]

Happy Sunday Everyone, Christ is King 👑

[Karoline Gosling @KarolineGosling]

Hi my name is Karoline and I am trying to destroy Feminism because it is evil and destroying society and has also ruined women

[Triny @TrinyDefi]

@madamayo_ 😂😂😂😂

[Triny @TrinyDefi]

@audreyisnew @Michelangel_art I just love pixel art

[Audrey @audreyisnew]

APPLIED FOR COLLABS

bullish on @Michelangel_art

bullish on pixel art..

[Triny @TrinyDefi]

@wale_gmi @jpegmonkes @RobinhoodCrypto Excited for these ☺️

[🥷🏼 @wale_gmi]

👀 EARLY ALPHA: @jpegmonkes

OG culture looking to make a comeback on @RobinhoodCrypto

Keep it on your radar. DYOR!

[Triny @TrinyDefi]

@Jennifer_Verse @Hoodfrenz 0xfcb6339c33e22f0b2141189d5bf2295fd5e7ed91

[Jennifer @Jennifer_Verse]

Free Mint GTD Spots for @Hoodfrenz

999 NFTs | Free mint | Mint TBA

-Follow @Hoodfrenz & @Jennifer_Verse
-Like retweet
-Drop your EVM wallet below.

10H left.

[Roninxx @kenn_ronin]

https://t.co/zRJbrMa7zZ

[Final Days @FinalDays365]

Meet The Scavenger.

While the world prepares for its end, he's busy looting abandoned places, collecting weapons and supplies. In the apocalypse, everything has a price. Even trust.

[GeniusThinking @GeniusGTX]

Elon Musk explains his 5-step process for running companies:

"First, make your requirements less dumb. Your requirements are definitely dumb. It does not matter who gave them to you.

It's particularly dangerous if a smart person gave you the requirements because you might not question them enough. Everyone's wrong no matter who you are.

Everyone's wrong some of the time. So make your requirements less dumb. Then try very hard to delete the part or process.

This is actually very important. If you're not occasionally adding things back in, you are not deleting enough.

The bias tends to be very strongly towards let's add this part or process step in case we need it. But you can basically make in-case arguments for so many things and for a rocket that is trying to be the first fully reusable rocket.

There's never been a fully reusable rocket. People don't understand. This is like the holy grail of rocketry. So you've got to delete the part or process step. Super important.

You can't hedge your bets. That's why the grid funds, for example, do not fall down because that's a whole extra mechanism that we don't need.

Also, whatever requirement or constraint you have, it must come with a name, not a department. Because you can't ask the department. You have to ask a person. That person who's putting forward their requirement or constraint must agree that they must take responsibility for that requirement.

Otherwise, you can have a requirement that basically an intern two years ago randomly came up with off the cuff and they're not even at the company anymore. These things are often just way more silly than you think. So step one, make your requirements less dumb.

Step two, delete the part or process step. If you're not adding things back in 10% of the time, you're clearly not deleting enough.

And then only the third step is simplify or optimize.

The third step, not the first step. The reason it's the third step is because possibly the most common error of a smart engineer is to optimize a thing that should not exist.

Everyone's been trained in high school and college that you've got to answer the question. Convergent logic. So you can't tell the professor your question is dumb. You'll get a bad grade. You have to answer the question. So everyone's basically, without knowing it, they've got a mental straitjacket on. They'll work on optimizing the thing that should simply not exist.

And then finally, you get to step four, which is accelerate cycle time.

You're moving too slowly, go faster. But don't go faster until you have worked on the other three things first. You can always make things go faster.

And then the final step is automate.

Now, I've personally made the mistake of going backwards on all five steps multiple times. Literally, I automated, accelerated, simplified, and then deleted.

One example I've talked about before is there were these fiberglass mats on top of the Model 3 battery pack that were in between the floor pan and the battery.

And it was at one point choking the battery pack production line. And I was basically living on the battery pack production line trying to fix the line.

It was choking the entire Model 3 production program. So the first mistake was I tried to fix the automation, like make the robot better. So automating was a mistake. Then accelerating was a mistake. Then optimizing was a mistake.

And finally, I said, what the hell are these mats for?

And I asked the battery safety team, what are these mats for? Are they for fire protection or something?

They said, no, they're for noise and vibration. Then I asked an NVH, a noise, vibration, harshness team, what's it for? They said fire safety.

So literally, it was like being in a Dilbert cartoon. Actually, I feel like I'm in a Dilbert cartoon quite frequently. So then finally, OK, great, let's try a car with the fiber glass mats and without. And they put a microphone to both and see if you can tell the difference.

In fact, I was like, which one is which? So we just deleted them and just bypassed this $2 million robot cell.

It was just a complete pile of nonsense."

[Victor. @Victorinweb]

The talk isn't about them collaborating with @VaultlingsNFT, it's why they are collaborating with them.

On Nov 10 they announced:

“HOOD DRAKES × @VaultlingsNFT
The dragons and the Vaultlings are linking up.
Recently escaped. Currently building.
Partnership locked in. 🐉 × 🦊”

Why they collaborated:
@HoodDrakes explicitly listed Vaultlings as one of the top communities on Robinhood Chain they wanted to partner with.

Other top communities include: @TheSuitedApes
@TMO_RH
@RobinWifHat

In their words, “It is our strong desire to partner with @TheSuitedApes, @VaultlingsNFT, @TMO_RH, and @RobinWifHat. We believe the very best communities should get the very best Free Mints.”

They see Vaultlings as one of the stronger, more established NFT communities on Robinhood Chain and want to give their holders access (likely GTD spots).

As posted in my previous post, they also have an Interest in collaborating with @TMO_RH.
They have not confirmed a collab yet, but they are clearly pursuing one.

On Nov 10 they included @TMO_RH in the same statement as Vaultlings, Suited Apes, and RobinWifHat — calling them one of “the very best communities” that “deserve” free mint access.

Initiates holders, something is coming for you soon. Stay based.

[Equitykeeper @Equitykeeper]

5,555 keepers on @Enter_Elysium

Sign the vault register - https://t.co/yEYEpnWvNo

[Triny @TrinyDefi]

Check quoted and claim
Limited spots available

[Mihaojpegs @Mihaojpegs]

3,333 Mihao cats are coming to Solana

Claim your free mint spot here

https://t.co/WEYOpjQRlP