@aaro_vgc @JimBowersclimb@CantPostIt@BR_Morde @catteronii_ @DreamLeaf5 Like the other guy said before with ideology like yours you would have been lobotomised or put into an asylum 100 years ago.
Not that I agree with that but that is a fact.
@aaro_vgc @JimBowersclimb@CantPostIt@BR_Morde @catteronii_ @DreamLeaf5 I acknowledge that the climate changes, I do not acknowledge that temperature is increasing at the rate that is claimed.
The data used is unreliable and two many variables are left out.
@aaro_vgc @JimBowersclimb@CantPostIt@BR_Morde @catteronii_ @DreamLeaf5 It’s actually not conclusive.
And I wouldn’t be accusing anyone of having a mental illness when you have your pronouns as they/them.
@JimBowersclimb@CantPostIt @aaro_vgc @BR_Morde @catteronii_ @DreamLeaf5 Those 2 things only tell you that the climate has changed in a particular area. It does not prove that man made climate change is real or the rate it is happening.
@JimBowersclimb@CantPostIt @aaro_vgc @BR_Morde @catteronii_ @DreamLeaf5 And like I’ve been saying comparing data from before the digital to data collected using modern methods can not be accurate.
@aaro_vgc @JimBowersclimb@CantPostIt@BR_Morde @catteronii_ @DreamLeaf5 I would need to see trends over the next few decades.
Where i know the data is collected by modern technology and I know where and when it is taken and know that data is collected to modern standards.
@JimBowersclimb @aaro_vgc @CantPostIt@BR_Morde @catteronii_ @DreamLeaf5 Oh what a load of bullshit.
I use the things on a daily basis and know even modern ones can be out sometimes significantly. I had to throw one out last week.
@aaro_vgc @JimBowersclimb@CantPostIt@BR_Morde @catteronii_ @DreamLeaf5 Nope. Depends on a multitude of variants, many of which would have been prevalent 100 years ago.
Things like location, type of glass, thickness of glass, quality of mercury, if the scale was accurate, was the scale on wooden mounts, ect. They did not have standards like we do.