they bred the cbd out the weed. thats what allowed for the long lasting effects as well as the better high. weed now is straight thc and that’s why everybody tweaking n getting psychosis lmao n only high for a few
>be married
>have children
>go to a watch your futbol team on your local stadium
>buy tortas to eat
>enjoy the weekend with your family together
THIS IS THE FUCKING MEXICAN DEAM, RIGHT HERE. THIS IS THE LIFE GOAL.
🚨Nobody wants to hear this but it needs to be said.
> Scientists just copied a fruit fly's brain into a computer. Neuron by neuron. No training data. No machine learning.
> It woke up and started walking. No one taught it to walk. No one trained it. No gradient descent. It just... knew what to do.
A fruit fly brain has 140,000 neurons.
A human brain is around 86,000,000,000.
And we've gotten really good at scaling.
Meaning with this proof, the first digital human won't be built by OpenAI. It'll be copied from someone who's already alive.
Your consciousness is software. And someone just proved it can be copy-pasted.
Start your day with that.
The most dangerous thing about leaving Earth isn’t the vacuum.
It’s the clarity.
When astronauts return from long missions, most talk about the Overview Effect in poetic terms. They describe seeing Earth as fragile, borderless, beautiful.
What rarely gets reported is the second layer of that experience — the part where the beauty curdles into something more disturbing.
Because once you’ve watched the planet from that altitude long enough, the human activity you observe starts to look less like civilization and more like a colony of organisms running programs they never consciously chose. Wars over invisible lines. Cities choking on their own exhaust. Seven billion people sprinting toward goals that were handed to them before they were old enough to question whether they wanted them.
I don’t think the “Big Lie about humanity” he’s describing is some kind of a conspiracy.
It’s something quieter and far more pervasive. It’s the collective hallucination that the world you were handed at birth is the world as it actually is. That the values you absorbed from your culture are the values that exist in nature. That the urgency you feel about status, money, and approval reflects something real about the universe rather than something manufactured by systems that benefit from your compliance.
Orbital altitude strips that hallucination away with brutal efficiency.
Gravity keeps more than your body on the ground. It keeps your perspective locked inside the consensus.
Astronauts who spend months outside that gravity field don’t just lose bone density. They lose the psychological weight of inherited assumptions. And when those assumptions lift, what sits underneath them is a question most humans never get forced to confront in a lifetime.
What would you actually want if nobody had ever told you what to want?
The Big Lie was never about them.
It was always about that question and how hard the entire structure of modern life works to make sure you never stop long enough to ask it.
The most dangerous assumption in human history isn't political, religious, or philosophical.
It's the assumption that time moves in one direction.
Every decision you've ever made, every regret you carry, every "if only I had done that differently" — all of it rests on a single premise so deeply embedded in your cognition that questioning it feels like questioning gravity. The premise is this: the past is fixed, the present is fleeting, and the future is where change lives.
Physicists just cracked that premise open at the quantum level.
When researchers examined quantum systems operating without the interference of classical observation, they found something that doesn't fit inside our ordinary language cleanly. Quantum particles don't experience a "before" and "after" the way you do walking from one room to another. At the quantum scale, physical processes unfolded in both temporal directions simultaneously — the math describing the system forward in time and the math describing it backward in time were both required to fully describe what was actually happening. Neither direction was the "real" one. Both were physically valid. Both were present at once.
To understand why this is catastrophic for our intuitions, you need to understand where our sense of time's direction actually comes from.
The laws of physics — Newton's laws, Maxwell's equations, even Einstein's relativity — are all time-symmetric. Run the equations forward or backward, they work identically. A video of billiard balls colliding looks physically valid whether you play it forward or in reverse. The mathematics doesn't care which direction time flows. There's no equation in classical physics that says "this way and only this way."
The only reason we experience time as a one-way arrow is thermodynamics. Specifically, entropy — the tendency of systems to move from ordered states to disordered states. A coffee cup shatters on the floor. It never spontaneously reassembles. Smoke disperses into a room. It never gathers back into a neat column. You can explain the direction of time entirely through the statistical improbability of disorder reversing itself at the macroscopic scale. Billions of atoms would have to coordinate their motion with extraordinary precision to run the movie backward. It's not impossible. It's just so astronomically unlikely that we call it impossible and build our entire civilizational concept of cause and effect on top of that statistical preference.
But entropy is a macroscopic phenomenon. It emerges from the behavior of massive numbers of particles averaging out into irreversible directionality.
At the scale of individual quantum particles, you don't have that averaging. You have one particle, or a handful, operating beneath the threshold where thermodynamic arrows become meaningful. And at that scale, the universe genuinely does not commit to a direction.
The observation of bidirectional time at quantum scale is not a metaphor or an interpretation. Researchers working with quantum heat engines — systems that exchange energy between quantum states — found that the arrow of thermodynamic time, the very thing that gives us past and future, broke down. Heat flows in ways that classical thermodynamics says should be impossible. The system doesn't recognize which end is the beginning.
What gets philosophically explosive is what this means for causality.
Our entire model of agency — of making choices, of living with consequences — is causality. Cause precedes effect. You do something, then something results from it. The arrow of time is what makes cause and effect distinguishable from each other at all. Remove the arrow, and cause and effect become two labels for the same bidirectional relationship rather than a sequence. Your action and its consequence are more like two ends of a rubber band than two points on a timeline.
Physicists like Yakir Aharonov spent decades developing what's called the two-state vector formalism — a mathematical framework for quantum mechanics that takes both the past and the future boundary conditions of a particle into account simultaneously when describing its present state. In this formalism, what a particle "is" right now is shaped by both what happened before it and what will happen after it. The future exerts a backward influence on the present the same way the past exerts a forward influence. The present moment sits at the intersection of two temporal streams running in opposite directions, and the particle's state is the product of both.
This isn't philosophy dressed in physics language. It produces testable predictions that differ from standard quantum mechanics. Some of those predictions have been confirmed experimentally through weak measurement techniques that let physicists probe quantum states without fully collapsing them.
The universe, at its most fundamental level, seems to run bidirectional influence as a standard operating procedure.
Now pull back to the human scale — not because quantum effects scale directly into consciousness, that debate remains genuinely open and contested — but because of what this does to your mental model of time as a container.
You likely carry your past as a fixed object. Something that happened, solidified, and now sits behind you exerting weight. The psychological gravity of past events — failures, traumas, identities formed under pressure — feel immovable precisely because time feels immovable. The past's power over you is borrowed almost entirely from its apparent permanence.
But if time at the fundamental level is not a river with a fixed source and mouth — if it folds, if it runs in both directions simultaneously, if present states are shaped by future boundary conditions just as much as past ones — then the rigidity you assign to your history is partly a perceptual artifact. Not because you can literally change what occurred, but because what something means, how it functions in your present, what causal weight it carries — all of that is not actually locked inside the past event. It lives in the relationship between that event and where you're moving.
Physicists call it retrocausality when future states influence present ones backward through time. Psychologists call it recontextualization when future growth changes how past events are processed and integrated. The mechanisms are wildly different in scale and kind. But both are pointing at the same fundamental feature: the present is not downstream of a fixed past. It sits between competing temporal influences running in both directions.
The reason this observation lands differently than a philosophy lecture is that it came from laboratory equipment measuring heat transfer in quantum systems. Nobody was trying to validate a spiritual framework or a therapeutic model. They were running thermodynamic experiments at quantum scale and found that the clock they assumed was running in one direction was running in both simultaneously.
What we call "moving forward in time" may be the macroscopic average of a process that, underneath, has no preferred direction at all.
That changes what you are inside time.
You are not a creature being passively pushed forward by a current with a fixed past behind you and an open future ahead. At the level where reality is built, you exist at a fold — a point where two directions of time press against each other and produce what you experience as "now." The choices you make at that fold don't just generate a future. They participate in defining what the fold itself means, which includes how past states function inside your present system.
The past isn't behind you.
It's still arriving.
i don't think zoomers and gen alpha will ever properly comprehend how close america was to racial harmony prior to obama. yeah, the muslims were still on our shit list, but racism was on its way to dying out in a generation or two. now we're more racist than ever.
A Japanese TV show has linked the Tengu demon that kidnapped & harmed children to the arrival of Jews to Japan during the 5th century 👺
Germanic people based trolls, witches & goblins in folklore on this same group of people.
Statues, art & folklore was created as a warning.
But now we are told, every race & every cultures recorded history & stories are wrong because they are antisemitic 🤔
This was Pablo Escobar in 1988 where he said that c0c@!n3 wasn’t the real problem, hypocrisy was. He argued drv&$ spread because of demand, just like alc0h0l, and that the U.S. only called c0c@!n3 dangerous because Colombians controlled it.