Kore'de 40 bin tavuk dükkanı var.
Dünyanın tamamındaki McDonald's şubesi de 40 bin.
Sebebi tavuk aşkı değil.
Kore'de maaşın yaşlandıkça otomatik artar. Sonra yaşın yüzünden yasayla kesilmeye başlar, adı zirve ücret. Sonra da yaşın yüzünden 60'ı görmeden kovulursun.
Elinde kalan kıdem tazminatı. O parayla kurulabilecek tek şey küçük bir tavuk dükkanı.
Kore'de bu sektörün adı: Beyaz yakalının mezarlığı.
Kore'de 65 ile 69 yaşındakilerin %57'si çalışıyor.
65 yaş üstünde her 10 kişiden 4'ü yoksul.
Sokakta karton toplayan 42 bin yaşlı var. Ortalama yaş 76. Saat başına kazançları asgari ücretin %12,7'si.
Bunların hepsi Samsung'un ülkesinde.
Ülke 30 yılda fakirlikten çıktı.
Kalkınmayı sırtında taşıyan kuşak çıkamadı.
“Ordunuz yok, o yüzden sizin ordunuz olmaya karar verdik”
En meşhur ve en deneyimli Fransız avukatlardan biri olan Gilles Devers, Siyonist varlığın Filistinlilere karşı işlediği suçlardan dolayı dava açmak için sadece 10 gün içinde dünyanın her kıtasından bir avukat ordusu topladı.
Devers’in topladığı Liste farklı milletlerden ve dinlerden 300 avukatı geçti ve daha fazlasının katılmasına hala açık.
Usta avukat Giles Devers işgalci İsrail’ i karanlık bir gelecekle tehdit etti ve Filistinlilere şöyle seslendi:
-"Sizi savunacak kimseniz yoktu ama artık uluslararası ve ulusal mahkemelerde sizi savunacak bir ordunuz var."
Today, I saw a Palestinian child picking up the brain of another Palestinian child.
Yes the actual brain.
He used a small rag to pick it up.
I also saw an infant ejected from his mother’s womb, due to the sheer power of the explosives Israel used in Gaza last night.
But the most inhumane thing was witnessing someone open up a baby’s soft pink onesie - only to discover pieces of bones and diaper inside.
Israel evaporated her little body with chemical weapons that are internationally banned.
It’s August 2, 2026 ➡️
Oliver Tambo: “Just about anything is welcome as an alternative to the Apartheid system”.
This is what happens when a liberation movement defines its primary victory negatively. In this case, as the removal of a regime rather than the affirmation of a specific economic system.
By declaring that “just about anything is welcome”, Tambo was speaking from the urgency of the time, but that signalled to White capital and the National Party that the ANC’s political flexibility was nearly infinite.
The then-President of the ANC had announced that his liberation movement was open to anything.
Tambo’s logic that defeat of the enemy was the sole immediate objective meant that concrete economic strategy was relegated to an afterthought. And because the ANC was hyper-focused on ending racial oppression at any cost, the Apartheid regime and White capital ensured that the cost went as high as possible.
To capitalise on this weakness, the White minority gave the ANC political authority, and in return they gained property rights protection, central bank independence, the Bill of Rights, Constitutional supremacy, the maintenance of the old macro-economic system and the ability to externalise capital.
Because the ANC had deferred the development of a concrete economic policy, when it inherited the state in 1994, it didn’t have a solid economic model that could withstand international market pressure and IMF/World Bank influence. The rest is history.
This “anything but this” logic didn’t stay confined to the ANC’s leadership, though. Three decades later, it has become the default mindset of the voters themselves, in the form of negative voting.
The 2024 general election outcome, which forced the creation of the Government of National Unity, is a classic example of this mentality.
Sections of the public, fed up with the ANC, were desperate to “vote it out” and constantly encouraged other voters to “vote for anyone but the ANC”, instead of voting *for* something specific.
So, just like the ANC in the ’80s and ’90s, 2024 was dictated by what South Africans were desperate to destroy rather than what they were organised to build.
Until this changes, the outcome will continuously default to more compromise and more stagnation.
We were taught the story of WWII wrong. This is the main reason many of us are so confused (at least on the West).
You see, we were told that in the Second World War, two major armies were fighting the Nazis: the Red Army and the American-led army, uniting France, Britain and other countries.
The only problem is, the Nazis and the American-led coalition of nations were in perfect agreement on everything the world except one issue.
Both the Americans and the Germans believed in the values of colonialism, ethnic cleansing and genocide. Both believed that black people were subhuman, and that Asians, Arabs, native Americans, and Slavs (read: all indigenous people on earth outside Western Europe) were inferior races - beliefs that now unite Europe, the US and other white colonies around the world.
Both believed their whiteness represented a divine right to rule and subjugate all of humanity, and own all its resources.
The only difference between the two sides was the Jewish question: Americans idolized them, and Germans demonized them. That's the entire difference. It is a minor dispute in an otherwise perfect harmony.
-
The punchline is this: the story of WWII was not the USSR and the US fighting one Nazi amy. The real story was the USSR fighting two Nazi armies.
And the Soviets made amazing gains and had heroic achievements, but eventually they lost the war when the Soviet Union was brought down in the early 1990s.
What we are seeing today is THIS WWII - the real WWII - still being waged, with Russia and China still fending off the Nazi attack (of which Japan is still a part, and Zionist is a central spearhead).
The war never ended. It just evolved.
The big difference now, which guarantees the defeat of the white supremacist, Jew-idolizing Nazis, is the reemergence of new-old anti-Nazi forces: China as the biggest and most powerful military and industrial power on earth; Iran as a major native power sitting on top of the world's energy reserves, and Russia regaining its confidence and power after the trauma of the 1990s (Yemen and North Korea add depth and weight to this alliance).
Additionally, the US has lost momentum and steam, and the white supremacist civilization is clearly the intellectual and military underdog that will never be able to subjugate all of humanity, and therefore has to collapse under the weight of its own insane delusions and megalomania)
If you look at things this way, everything make perfect sense, without gaps and inconsistencies.
Au XIXe siècle, la reine Victoria ne dirigeait pas seulement un empire : elle était à la tête du plus puissant cartel de la drogue de la planète.
Oubliez les bonnes manières et l'élégance du thé de cinq heures. Tout commence par un problème de comptabilité.
Dans les années 1830, Londres a un déficit commercial abyssal avec la Chine. Les Britanniques importent des quantités astronomiques de thé, de soie et de porcelaine.
Mais l'empereur chinois Daoguang méprise les marchandises anglaises. Il n'accepte qu'un seul moyen de paiement : l'argent pur.
La Grande-Bretagne se vide littéralement de ses métaux précieux. Pour sauver la balance commerciale, des marchands britanniques mettent au point une stratégie machiavélique.
À leur tête, William Jardine. Un respectable homme d'affaires écossais, mais surtout le premier grand baron de la drogue de l'Histoire moderne.
Si les Chinois ne veulent rien acheter, Jardine et la Compagnie des Indes vont leur vendre un produit dont ils ne pourront plus se passer.
Le plan est d'un cynisme absolu et fonctionne à la perfection. On inonde le pays d'opium.
Des millions de Chinois deviennent toxicomanes. Le flux financier s'inverse. L'argent pur quitte la Chine pour remplir les coffres de Londres.
La faillite britannique est évitée grâce à un trafic de stupéfiants d'État.
Mais en 1839, l'empereur Daoguang décide d'arrêter le massacre. Il envoie à Canton un haut fonctionnaire totalement incorruptible : Lin Zexu.
Lin Zexu ne négocie pas avec les cartels. Il fait encercler les entrepôts étrangers et détruit plus de 1 000 tonnes d'opium de contrebande sur la plage.
En temps normal, c'est une simple saisie douanière.
Mais William Jardine rentre à Londres et va murmurer à l'oreille du ministre des Affaires étrangères, Lord Palmerston.
Quand le chef du cartel finance les campagnes politiques et possède la Royal Navy, la saisie devient un casus belli. Lord Palmerston déclare la guerre à la Chine.
Pas pour défendre le droit international. Pour protéger les marges de ses trafiquants.
Les navires de guerre de Sa Majesté bombardent les côtes et massacrent les défenses chinoises avec une brutalité inouïe. La Chine capitule.
Le traité de paix qui suit est un pur contrat d'extorsion.
La Chine est forcée de rembourser au centime près la valeur de la drogue détruite, d'ouvrir ses ports et de céder une petite île pour faciliter la logistique des contrebandiers : Hong Kong.
Dans les livres d'Histoire, on appelle pudiquement cela l'ouverture au libre-échange.
La réalité est beaucoup plus crue.
Une nation souveraine a été mise à feu et à sang par le gouvernement de la reine Victoria, prêt à tout pour écouler sa came et sauver son économie.
The Orange Basin is a great example of how NGOs are holding SA back.
I was shocked to find out that 60% of the Orange Basin (where Namibia found its oil) is in South Africa.
The reason South Africa hasn't drilled for any oil is because NGOs are citing environmental impact
İngilterenin sömürgesi altındayken Britanyalı yetkilileri ve ailelerini serinletmek için Pankha denilen dev kumaş yelpazeleri gece gündüz çalıştırmakla görevli Hintli hizmetkârlar
‘Pankawallahlar’ 👇
@ThrillaRilla369 I'm mad that I can't buy CD's. I have my collection of CD's & hard drive with MP3's & FLAC, many on my phone. Recently dusted off my Bluray player to indulge my ears.
you see this red splotch covering Gaza? it is made of red dots, each single dot represents an airstrike under the Biden’s administration. it took two years of tremendous relentless unforgiving bombing and 4 US vetos to complete. you can’t regret your way out of this.
Oh fuck you. FUCK you. You don't get to do this now. You don't get to turn around and go "Oopsie poopsie, we made a mistake!" This was YOUR genocide, motherfuckers. YOURS. You chose it. You own it. Forever. The stench of the rotting corpses in Gaza will follow you for all time.
Colonizers are furious with Traoré, he has completely checkmated them. He reassured the 10% Christian minority they won’t be subjected to religious laws they never signed up for, while firmly telling the 90% Muslim majority to get their priorities straight. Parasites are pissed!
Chinese billionaire & venture capitalist Eric Li explains why China🇨🇳 is winning the competition against the US🇺🇸:
‘In America, you can change the party but you can’t change the policies. In China🇨🇳, you cannot change the party, but you can change the policies.’
‘China is a vibrant market economy but it is not a capitalist economy. There’s no way a group of billionaires could control the politburo, as billionaires control US policymaking.
So in China, you have a vibrant market economy, but capital does not rise above political authority.’
The Chinese president stood on a stage in Shanghai and laid out China's entire AI playbook in one speech.
It was his first-ever in-person appearance at the World AI Conference. I went through the whole thing and pulled out everything that matters.
- he opened with his signature maxim that great changes unseen in a century are unfolding across the world.
- he said AI development should not be a solo performance by a single country but a symphony of international cooperation.
- he reaffirmed China's commitment to open source AI in the name of openness and shared benefit.
- he warned against overstretching the concept of national security in AI, where one country puts its own security above everyone else's.
- he said China opposes the emergence of new historical injustices in AI, one of the strongest-worded lines in the speech.
- he pledged 5,000 AI training opportunities for developing countries over the next five years, naming ASEAN, the Arab League, the African Union, CELAC, the SCO, and BRICS.
- he committed to giving 30 countries access to a Chinese AI weather system that provides early disaster warnings.
- a day before the speech, 29 countries signed the agreement creating a new World AI Cooperation Organization headquartered in Shanghai.
strip away the politics and one thing stands out to me. he didn't pitch benchmarks or chatbots. he pitched AI as infrastructure, weather warnings for countries that lose thousands of lives to storms they never saw coming, and training programs for regions the AI boom has skipped.
meanwhile most of the Western AI conversation revolves around which lab ships the next frontier model.
I don't care who wins the race. I care whether the computing power reaches the people who need it.
The full speech is below, and it's worth your time.
In a conversation with Ntsiki Mazwai, Prof Sipho Seepe argues that when Apartheid became unworkable, the ruling class looked for ways to contain the power of the Black majority.
According to Prof Seepe, because Black South Africans held the numbers to dominate a parliamentary democracy, White people pushed for a shift toward a constitutional democracy to oversee and restrict Black power.
Prof Seepe characterises the normalised warning against majoritarianism as a false narrative, and points out the irony that courts themselves operate on majority decisions rather than immediate, unanimous consensus.
To illustrate that judges are not neutral or infallible, he cites the Phala Phala case, noting it took 15 months to yield entirely different legal interpretations.
He also outlines how the decisions and leaders of the Black majority are constantly undermined and audited by external forces, specifically the mainstream media and academics and that post-1994 South Africa failed to thoroughly interrogate and reform core systems, namely the media, the judiciary, and universities, leaving the original structural architecture of control untouched.
🗣️Burkina Faso Devlet Başkanı Yüzbaşı İbrahim Traoré:
Bir gün, Batılı bir ülkenin gizli servisinden yetkililer bizi görmeye geldi. Bize, teröristlerin bulunduğu bölgelere gönderilecek yiyeceklerin içine katılması için dört farklı ürün teklif ettiler.
Bu ürünlerin her şeye katılabileceğini belirttiler; bira veya şekerli içecekler, sigara, pirinç, süt... Kısacası her şeyin içine konulabiliyor.
Ürünlerin etkilerini şu şekilde anlattılar:
Beyni tahrip eden ürün:
Amacı beyni öldürmek. Yani kişinin düşünmesini engelliyor. Nöronlarınızı yavaş yavaş kapatıyor ve sizi adeta aptallaştırıyor. Birkaç yıl içinde düşünme ve iş yapma kapasiteniz tamamen azalıyor.
Fiziksel kapasiteyi düşüren ürün:
Bu ürün fiziksel dayanıklılığı hedef alıyor. Eğer bir kişi 12 kilometre koşabiliyorsa, birkaç yıl sonra bu oran belki 6 kilometreye, 4 kilometreye düşüyor; kişi giderek zayıflıyor.
Uyku hali yapan ürün:
Sürekli uyku durumuna neden oluyor. Bunun vücutta tam olarak neyi etkilediğini ve nasıl çalıştığını doktorlar daha iyi bilir.
Onları dikkatle dinledik ve ardından ürünlerin isimlerini sorduk. Bize isimlerini vermediler ve kalkıp gittiler.
Ancak gitmeden önce onlara şunu sorduk: 'Bunu daha önce bir yerde test ettiniz mi? Gerçekten işe yarıyor mu? Aksi takdirde neden buna para ödeyip böyle bir işe girelim?' Çünkü bize bu teklifi getirmelerindeki amaç, teröristlerin olduğu bölgelerdeki bireylerin zamanla zayıflaması ve birkaç yıl içinde tarafımızca kolayca ezilebilecek hale gelmesiydi.
Bize verdikleri yanıt; 'Evet, bunu daha önce Afrika'da bir yerlerde ve Asya'da da kullandık' oldu. Bunu daha önce defalarca kullanmışlar.
Biliyor musunuz, kanımı donduran şey ne oldu? Kendi kendime, 'Evet, Afrika'nın işi bitmiş' dedim. Çünkü aslında bunu halihazırda Afrika'da kullanıyorlar.
Calling us Houthis is like calling the Iranian people Khomeinis. Wouldn't it be better to call us Yemenis instead of Houthis?
I wish that were the case, because "Houthi" is the title of the leader of the Yemeni revolution, Sayyid Abdul-Malik Badr al-Din al-Houthi, while the entire population participated in the September 21, 2014 revolution. Therefore, you should call us by our true name: Yemenis or Ansar Allah (Supporters of God).
The name "Houthis" is used by our enemies to belittle us and deny our existence as a state, government, people, and army. Therefore, I hope you will not call us by the name our enemies use for us.