@kenthecowboy_ Motte: spouses need touch that doesn’t always become sex.
Move: wife controls escalation; his arousal/frustration becomes “pressure.”
Bailey: she doesn’t desire him or enjoys hurting him, but “safety” makes her the victim.
@kenthecowboy_ Motte: spouses need touch that doesn’t always become sex.
Move: wife controls escalation; his arousal/frustration becomes “pressure.”
Bailey: she doesn’t desire him or enjoys hurting him, but “safety” makes her the victim.
@kenthecowboy_ Motte: spouses need touch that doesn’t always become sex.
Move: wife controls escalation; his arousal/frustration becomes “pressure.”
Bailey: she doesn’t desire him or enjoys hurting him, but “safety” makes her the victim.
@ojos_nuevos@jrj1130@WildSentences But the gist is correct, in that minors generally lack full legal capacity to manage, sell, encumber, or convey it without an adult fiduciary or court-approved mechanism.
@ojos_nuevos@jrj1130@WildSentences This is wrong. Minors can and do own real property. Your point about managing the property is better founded.
If a minor buys property from a third party, the purchase is likely voidable at the election of the minor, but that materially different from a bar on owning property.
@Launchpadteam1@bumbadum14 This is why OP gets a B+ from me, higher if he develops his premises competently. If your conclusion and his were swapped, I’d grade by the same rubric. Your whole argument is an enthymeme, leaving out the premise that would actually require defending. C for you.
@Launchpadteam1@bumbadum14 OP showed his work. Observation, premises, limiting principle, conclusion. You keep gesturing at context & refusing to state your rule. What’s your principle for the relationship between historical fact & narrative? Say it out loud. Otherwise this isn’t an argument, it’s evasion.
@Launchpadteam1@bumbadum14 Didn’t include the quote because it’s immaterial. Johnson explicitly disclaims racism in her specific experiences at NASA. The quote is only useful here if you’re fine applying broad generalities to specific people without regard to their accuracy. That’s stereotyping.
@Launchpadteam1@bumbadum14 You are doing the exact same thing the movie did. You are fabricating racial slights to paint a world the actual subject explicitly disclaimed. That is not analysis. It is narrative enforcement.
@Launchpadteam1@bumbadum14 Johnson never said she was constantly fearful or searching for the colored bathroom. She described NASA as professional and merit-based and said she did not feel segregation there.
@suckerbarbarism@CiceroInExilium@peterrhague This is what’s so odd about all this. I neither asked nor expected you to agree with me. I merely invited you to consider aspects of the hypothetical running counter to your position. Instead, you resort to being a catty bitch, as if you can’t help yourself. It is fascinating
@suckerbarbarism@CiceroInExilium@peterrhague You have identified one asymmetry regarding coordination. It is real and significant. You are overlooking an additional asymmetry that is every bit as real and every bit as significant, if not more so, running the opposite direction.
@CiceroInExilium@peterrhague It’s the exact opposite. We understand the blue thought process. Many of us can even appreciate the underlying sentiment. But we understand that pressing blue entails a completely unnecessary risk of life and that maximum effort should be made to ensure every person presses red.