Turbo ❁

Graphic Designer | Product Designer | A Manchester United fan 🤪 Surpass your limits 🚀

[MercyInDesign👩🏾‍💻👩🏾‍🎨 @OrisOmobolanle]

A little later than planned, but here's the first design in the series. 😊

Today's prompt: Splash Screen + Login Screen for Nexora, a fictional AI productivity app.

I focused on simplicity and creating a smooth first impression.

#UIDesign #UXDesign #Figma #BuildinginPublic

[MercyInDesign👩🏾‍💻👩🏾‍🎨 @OrisOmobolanle]

Back to the UI series after a little break. 🚀

Sign Up Screen

For this one, I switched things up by placing social sign-in options before the form to make the onboarding experience feel quicker and more effortless.

What do you think?

#UIDesign #Figma #BuildinginPublic

[Ajoje⚽⚖️ @israel_ajoje]

UEFA have taken a stand. And it is against FIFA. What are the implications of this for FIFA and World Football at large?

Stay with me.

This morning UEFA held an emergency meeting of all 55 member associations. The vote was unanimous. No UEFA national team will participate in any FIFA competition for as long as these proposals remain alive, unless the plan is abandoned in its entirety and binding assurances are given that FIFA will never again open its governance or competitions to private ownership.

It basically means that Germany, France, England, Spain, every European nation will be gone from the World Cup and every other FIFA competition if Infantino does not back down.

I have written about this situation in detail over the last week, from the legal structure of FIFA Forward Enterprise to the funding numbers for member associations to the winners and losers analysis. What happened today changes the scale of the conversation entirely. It is becoming an existential crisis for world football as we know it.

Let me walk you through the consequences clearly.

The most immediate consequence is financial and it is devastating for FIFA. At the 2026 World Cup, UEFA members made up six of the eight quarter-final squads and three of the four semi-finalists, while Spain ultimately lifted the trophy. A World Cup without European nations is not a diminished World Cup. It is likely to be a fundamentally different and commercially worthless product.

Every broadcast deal FIFA has signed for future tournaments is built on the assumption that Germany, France, England, Spain, Italy, Portugal and the rest of Europe will be there. If you remove them, those deals collapse or have to be renegotiated at a fraction of their current value.

The $4.2 billion FIFA is trying to raise through FFE is predicated on the World Cup being worth $20 billion. Without European football, that valuation will be considerably lower.

The second consequence is political and it now extends beyond UEFA. Asian Football Confederation president Sheikh Salman bin Ebrahim Al-Khalifa has branded FIFA's lack of consultation over the plan totally unacceptable, saying the move undermined the sport's existing continental structure.

The AFC represents 47 member associations. If Asian opposition hardens into a coordinated bloc alongside UEFA's 55 members, Infantino cannot get the 106 votes he needs for approval regardless of how attractive the funding offer looks to smaller associations.

The third consequence is legal and it is the one nobody is discussing yet. UEFA's boycott threat, if carried out, would trigger breach of obligations under FIFA's own statutes and the RSTP, which require member associations to participate in official FIFA competitions.

But it would simultaneously expose FIFA to legal challenge from those same associations if they argue the FFE proposal itself breaches FIFA's statutory duty to govern the game in the interests of football rather than private investors. Both sides have legal ammunition and they will fire it if they have to.

One dimension of this boycott that has not been discussed enough is what happens at club level. UEFA's statement covers national teams, but the mechanism that makes any boycott operational runs through the clubs.

Under the RSTP, clubs are obligated to release players for international duty during official FIFA windows. But that obligation exists within a framework where the relevant confederation and member association are participating in FIFA's structure.

If UEFA's member associations formally withdraw from FIFA competitions, the legal basis for the release obligation becomes significantly more complicated. European clubs may well argue that they have no duty to release players for competitions their own confederation has declared illegitimate.

If that argument holds, FIFA cannot compel release and the boycott extends automatically from national teams to clubs without UEFA needing to say another word.

The Club World Cup, which FIFA just expanded to 32 teams and sold broadcast rights for at enormous valuations, loses most of its commercial value the moment European clubs are not in it.

Chelsea, Manchester City, Real Madrid, Bayern Munich, these are not peripheral participants. They are the product. A Club World Cup without them is not a diminished competition. It is an unwatchable one. And the private investors FIFA is trying to attract with a $20 billion valuation of FFE are about to discover that the asset they were buying is worth considerably less than advertised if European football walks out the door.

Infantino said this week that FFE represents a golden opportunity to turbocharge the development of the game globally. What he has produced instead is the most serious institutional crisis in FIFA's history since the corruption scandals of 2015. The difference is that in 2015, the threat came from law enforcement. This time it is coming from inside the game itself.

My name is Ajoje. I am a FIFA Licensed Agent and International Sports Lawyer. I write on the Law and Business of Football, a lot. Repost and Follow if you want to read more posts like this.

[Ajoje⚽⚖️ @israel_ajoje]

This one is really dicey.

FIFA is registered as a non-profit association under Swiss law. Its 211 member associations own it. It pays no corporate tax in Switzerland. And right now, while the ink is barely dry on the 2026 World Cup final, it is in advanced discussions to sell a minority stake in its commercial operations to private investors, with JP Morgan acting as financial adviser and Thrive Capital, whose chief executive is Josh Kushner, expected to lead the investor group.

UEFA is responding. And I see reason with them. Their statement called it a crossing of a line and said the soul and governance of football are not assets to trade.

Let me explain what is actually happening here and why both positions are legally and commercially coherent at the same time.

The legal vehicle at the centre of this is called FIFA Forward Enterprise, or FFE. It is a FIFA-owned company that would consolidate all of FIFA's commercial rights, broadcasting, sponsorship, ticketing, licensing, and the operational delivery of FIFA tournaments, into a single entity.

Based on how things are proposed, FIFA would retain majority control and exclusive authority over governance, competitions, the match calendar, and all regulatory and sporting decisions.

Private investors would then hold a minority, non-controlling stake in the subsidiary, not in FIFA itself. FIFA says the proposal could deliver more than $10 billion in football development funding over the next four years.

Now here is the legal position.

Under Swiss association law, FIFA has broad autonomy over how it manages and commercialises its assets, provided it pursues its statutory purpose of promoting football and follows its internal decision-making rules.

Creating a commercial subsidiary and selling minority stakes in it to private investors is not categorically prohibited under any applicable law. FIFA already commercialises its rights aggressively through sponsorships, media deals, and licensing arrangements worth billions of dollars per cycle.

Placing some of that commercial activity into a valued vehicle and inviting outside capital is structurally an extension of what FIFA already does, not a departure from it. The proposal requires approval from the FIFA Council and the 211 member associations. That approval process is where the real legal constraints sit, not in Swiss corporate law.

What UEFA is objecting to is not the legality of the structure. They are objecting to the incentive architecture it creates once private capital is inside the tent. And again, that objection deserves to be taken seriously.

Even with formal majority control retained, private investors seeking returns will create ongoing pressure. They will request more matches, an expanded calendar. They will make decisions that prioritise revenue over player welfare or competitive balance.

Of course that pressure will not arrive through a boardroom vote. It arrives gradually, through the logic of what a return on investment requires. FIFA can retain exclusive authority over sporting decisions and still find that sporting decisions are shaped by the financial expectations of its commercial partners. Those are not mutually exclusive outcomes.

The legal permissibility of this structure is high if internal approvals are obtained. The binding constraints are member consent, political capital, and the risk that private capital incentives gradually reshape priorities even under retained formal control.

Football has watched that process play out at club level for thirty years. The question being asked right now, with genuine urgency, is whether the same dynamic should be allowed inside the institution that governs the game itself.

My name is Ajoje. I am a FIFA Licensed Agent and International Sports Lawyer. I write on the Law and Business of Football, a lot. Repost and Follow if you want to read more posts like this.

[MercyInDesign👩🏾‍💻👩🏾‍🎨 @OrisOmobolanle]

🚨Reminder that Nottingham Forest have more European Cups than Arsenal.

And they won theirs consecutively.

The "biggest club in London" debates are doing a lot of heavy lifting for a club with zero Champions League trophies. 😂

[Turbo ❁ @TurboDesignsNG]

@TheFootyFeed Quite easy actually 😅 2 more games to go, 2 pts means York draws their next 2 games & gets promoted since Rochdale is one of the teams they're playing against.
But they will not be promoted if they win the 1st match and lose the 2nd game to Rochdale and Rochdale wins both games

[Raheem (kati) @Oladega_]

🚨We’re officially launching https://t.co/hfoWt7LlSM, a premium design subscription service for brands that love to move fast🔥.

One flat monthly fee for unlimited:
• UI/UX & Web Design
• Framer Development
• Branding & Graphics

You start getting results in 48-72h.

Visit https://t.co/hfoWt7LlSM to get started.
Only taking 2 partners for a start. 🚫

[Dweller @One_Way_Home]

We all need more of this…

[MercyInDesign👩🏾‍💻👩🏾‍🎨 @OrisOmobolanle]

Tried my hands on a spiral motion animation, this time, a Champions League-inspired one 🌀⚽️
Every club’s chasing the dream, but my heart’s set on one🌚: Chelsea lifting it again 🤭😎💙🏆 @DebsSZN @A_kinola02 @Boy_Teegee @sparkliin 🙈🙈 #UCL #DesignMotion #MotionDesign

[MercyInDesign👩🏾‍💻👩🏾‍🎨 @OrisOmobolanle]

Back to the drawing board, literally 🤭🎨
Reworking one of my old design projects from @AltSchoolAfrica , starting with fresh onboarding screens and smoother prototypes. Time to make it shine 🌟 Open to feedback & suggestions 🙌🏽
#Fintech #DesignProcess #Prototyping #UIUXDesign

[MercyInDesign👩🏾‍💻👩🏾‍🎨 @OrisOmobolanle]

Officially a Product Design Graduate from @AltSchoolAfrica Almost missed out on the @kikimordi scholarship back then ‘cause finances were tough, but God came through 🙏🏽

Juggling 9–5 life with classes, deadlines & sleepless nights wasn’t easy, but I am grateful for it all...

[Adeola’s Art @ololademiarix]

Character sculpt in Zbrush based on a concept i found on Artstation

Thanks for viewing ✨

[Toyyib Adewale Adelodun @taadelodun]

Told he was not Goldman Sachs material. Now he runs the firm.

David Solomon was rejected twice by Goldman Sachs.

The second time was brutal.

He made it to the final interview and had to meet a partner at the firm.

The partner looked at his CV and said, "David, let's face it, you're really not Goldman Sachs material."

Today, he is the CEO of Goldman Sachs.

"Success is going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm."

Rejection is only feedback. Persistence rewrites destiny.

Hold your head up and keep going🙏

Share this with someone who needs encouragement today, and follow for more real stories of persistence and success.

[Turbo ❁ @TurboDesignsNG]

@TouchlineX Ted Lasso

[Zainab @logoladystudio]

I cooked democracy day flyer. A or B? #June12 #DemocracyDay

[MercyInDesign👩🏾‍💻👩🏾‍🎨 @OrisOmobolanle]

Recreated an estate home landing page as part of my practice routine. It hasn’t been easy balancing work and personal growth, but I make sure to create something whenever I’m less busy at work. Hoping to land internships where I can learn, grow, and contribute. #uiux #uidesign

[Samuel @cnvs_sam]

@dnaijatechguy One method I used was the 3 column method.

I basically added data to first two columns and "details" in 3rd column, so when you click details, full data is displayed in slide up modal.

See it below.

(Still testing)

[MercyInDesign👩🏾‍💻👩🏾‍🎨 @OrisOmobolanle]

Had some free time, so I quickly jumped on tweaking the PiggyVest interface …just minor updates to icons and images. Small details, big impact🚀 #UI #practice #uiuxdesign #piggyvest #savings #gettingusedtothefigmainterface

[MercyInDesign👩🏾‍💻👩🏾‍🎨 @OrisOmobolanle]

Hey design fam! 🎨✨ I’m not exactly a logo guru—I run from it as much as I can! 😅 But I’m shooting my shot with these 3 logo options for my food app, FoodSwift. 🍽️🚀 Which one do you think works best? Drop your votes and feedback below! ⬇️#LogoDesign #FoodApp #UI #productdesign

[Turbo ❁ @TurboDesignsNG]

@OrisOmobolanle Has to be the second one for me ❤️❤️