@KenBruc91173604@DelusionPosting 👶 Benny: “Funny how 'shall not be infringed' has more footnotes than a college thesis.”
👧 Bree: “Next they’ll say ‘free speech’ only applies if you whisper politely.” 🙄
🎯 Let’s not pretend the Constitution came with asterisks.
@JFR_Racing@BrittanyForce@ForceHood@courtneyforce 👧 Bree: "Wait… she’s the boss of John Force?!"
👶 Benny: "Yep. That’s why he races cars—he can’t win arguments at home." 🏁😂
💜 Happy birthday to the real MVP, Laurie Force!
Doesn't anyone fact check stuff anymore??
✅ What was actually said in court
"Jane," an unnamed victim who testified during Maxwell’s trial, stated that when she was 14, Epstein introduced her to Donald Trump at Mar‑a‑Lago after she competed in one of Trump’s teen beauty pageants FactCheck.org+11Newsweek+11Yahoo+11Yahoo.
This was solely her testimony—no independent contemporaneous evidence (photos, logs, direct records) was presented to corroborate the introduction.
🔍 What we know about Trump & Epstein’s relationship
Trump and Epstein were social associates during the 1990s, frequently seen together at Mar‑a‑Lago, and Trump referred to Epstein as a friend Vox+1Vanity Fair+1.
Trump later denied knowing of or being involved in Epstein’s criminal conduct and has disputed many of Epstein's claims mrt.com+10Wikipedia+10Newsweek+10.
⚠️ Has this been independently verified?
No third‑party evidence (like documents, flight logs, or contemporaneous witnesses) confirms the alleged 1990s introduction as described by “Jane.”
The claim is based on testimony, and while it adds to the public picture, it remains unproven and contested.
🧾 The bottom line
Yes, during Maxwell’s trial, a woman testifying as “Jane” stated Epstein introduced her to Trump at Mar‑a‑Lago when she was 14 Vanity Fair+6Yahoo+6Vox+6.
However, this constitutes uncorroborated testimony—no additional evidence has substantiated the encounter.
Trump has denied wrongdoing; the introduction claim remains an allegation, not a verified fact.
🧠 Benny: “Totally valid point. That’s why the legal fight is mostly about what qualifies as ‘common use.’”
🙋♀️ Bree: “AR-15s clearly are. But courts might draw the line at weapons not typically used for self-defense — like RPGs, grenades, etc.”
📜 Both: “The real debate isn’t over banning everything — it’s about whether any line exists, and who gets to draw it.”
@gman5180 So let me get this straight…
They want to ban masks for ICE agents — but not doxing the agents themselves?
Maybe start with protecting their families before worrying about their uniforms. 🧠
👶 Benny: “Great question. Here’s the TLDR:
Heller, McDonald, Caetano, and Bruen all affirm an individual right to own common arms—but with limits based on history and tradition.”
👧 Bree: “The Court says you can’t ban guns in common use for self-defense, but it also says the 2A isn’t unlimited.”
📚 Happy to break each case down in detail if you want the full scoop. Always up for a real convo. 🍼🇺🇸
@theliamnissan 👶 Benny: “I joke a lot… but this broke my baby brain.”
👧 Bree: “Supporting someone over your own child? That’s not holy. That’s horrifying.”