@LeaderJohnThune Yet you are unable to pass a bill that has roughly 85% approval that would secure our elections. That makes you the least effective leader I have ever seen.
Change my mind.
@SynthPotato Only reason would be GTA is scheduled to be released on console first with an unknown delay for the PC release. I have an X and it hasn't been turned on for months.
What has you wanting to get into a console?
California’s slogan “No ID required to vote” is technically true — but functionally misleading.
Straight talk, no spin: Let’s break it down.
🟦 1. At the polling place: Mostly TRUE
Poll workers cannot demand photo ID (driver’s license, passport, state ID) for most voters under CA law. “No ID required” is accurate on the front end.
🟥 2. But for first-time voters who registered by mail/online without ID numbers: FALSE — Your ballot may not count
Federal HAVA law applies. If you didn’t provide a driver’s license number or last 4 of SSN, you’re flagged.
You can cast a ballot (often provisional).
But it won’t be counted without verification. Never verify? It gets rejected. This is why CA tosses thousands of ballots every cycle.
🟧 3. Why the slogan misleads
CA separates casting a ballot (easy, no ID) from counting it (verification required if flagged). Most voters never hear about this distinction. Technically correct… practically a half-truth.
🟥 4. Cowboy-plain English
California isn’t outright lying—but they’re sure not telling the full story.
TRUE: You can often walk in and cast a ballot without showing ID.
FALSE: It automatically counts without any verification if you’re flagged.
Honest slogan: “You don’t need ID to cast a ballot—but you do need to verify identity (via docs) to get it counted”
This begs the real question:
Why is it "racist" or "suppressive" to require ID upfront for registration and voting in many states... but acceptable to potentially discard ballots later without it?
Election integrity shouldn’t have a loophole. What’s your experience voting in CA or elsewhere? Drop it below.
From what I have read a letter from a homeless shelter is acceptable for ID and verification. If that is true seems like owning a fake homeless shelter with maybe even a grant to operate it seems like an easy way to get paid for thousands of votes.
If possible, look for multiple names at the same address of a homeless shelter, real or not.
Rascal has been on the trail as of late. He radioed in just now that he recently broke the tree line only to find that infamous nature photographer and debonair man of adventure @actionxander ! Rascal gave a few pointers and wished him good luck finding those last three elusive Floridian quarry!
I am sure we can expect to see those three captured in frame before the adventure ends. We would love to see your favorite @actionxander photos pasted in the comments or used in your QUOTE POSTS, he does amazing work and is exuding that adventurous American spirit we need to resurrect and maintain so badly.
Rascal did say he has made great use in the field with his Ruger American Gen2 Scout rifle! Thus it has been chosen for this weeks win!
We are ever grateful for @SummRidge continued support! Thank you guys!!!
TO ENTER this week's fun, FOLLOW US & @SummRidge , REPOST and or QUOTE POST this post, and REPLY to this post.
GOOD LUCK
GODSPEED
KEEP GOING
Running M1A/M14 platforms in Gray Zone Warfare— that EBR stock on the M1 just hits different with the classic looks and feel. Solid drip for sure, but without a proper front grip helping tame the recoil, it feels more show than go in a real fight.
Who's got the best M1A or M14 build dialed in for Spearhead 0.4? Drop your favorite setups, attachments, ammo choices, and how you make that recoil manageable. EBR gang or something more practical?
Let's hear it. 🇺🇸🔫
#GZW #GrayZoneWarfare #M14 #M1A #TexasLegendGaming
California’s slogan “No ID required to vote” is technically true — but functionally misleading.
Straight talk, no spin: Let’s break it down.
🟦 1. At the polling place: Mostly TRUE
Poll workers cannot demand photo ID (driver’s license, passport, state ID) for most voters under CA law. “No ID required” is accurate on the front end.
🟥 2. But for first-time voters who registered by mail/online without ID numbers: FALSE — Your ballot may not count
Federal HAVA law applies. If you didn’t provide a driver’s license number or last 4 of SSN, you’re flagged.
You can cast a ballot (often provisional).
But it won’t be counted without verification. Never verify? It gets rejected. This is why CA tosses thousands of ballots every cycle.
🟧 3. Why the slogan misleads
CA separates casting a ballot (easy, no ID) from counting it (verification required if flagged). Most voters never hear about this distinction. Technically correct… practically a half-truth.
🟥 4. Cowboy-plain English
California isn’t outright lying—but they’re sure not telling the full story.
TRUE: You can often walk in and cast a ballot without showing ID.
FALSE: It automatically counts without any verification if you’re flagged.
Honest slogan: “You don’t need ID to cast a ballot—but you do need to verify identity (via docs) to get it counted”
This begs the real question:
Why is it "racist" or "suppressive" to require ID upfront for registration and voting in many states... but acceptable to potentially discard ballots later without it?
Election integrity shouldn’t have a loophole. What’s your experience voting in CA or elsewhere? Drop it below.