🇬🇧 "We don't want this surveillance culture. We want a high trust society again."
Restore Britain Candidate @Tyler4Restore Calls for Digital BILL OF RIGHTS to combat and stop digital ID.
I have tabled a parliamentary motion officially calling on the Government to recognise and protect English, Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish ethnicities as distinct historic identities.
We should never be ashamed to defend who we are.
All MPs have been invited to support.
🇬🇧 "I want to see REMIGRATION. If we want to unite together as a country and as a people, we have to put the interests of our own people first."
Restore Britain Candidate @Tyler4Restore speaks to @WillColeshill about their plan to save Britain.
An English ethnic identity obviously exists, reflecting generations of deep connection to a particular part of our islands, to our home.
Pretending that historic peoples do not exist
makes any honest discussion about demographic change impossible.
The English exist, and we will not be erased.
Demographic security is a legitimate subject of democratic politics and Restore Britain has committed to ensuring that security.
An England or Britain filled with Indians, Afghans and Somalians would be no England or Britain at all.
Why are we uniquely forbidden from having any interest in our own demographic future?
This is our home, and we don’t have anywhere else to go.
It’s all so tiring. Another lecture from someone who hasn’t read the policies or understands the party.
Judge us on policy. It doesn’t take a genius to figure this out.
I don’t want to move goalposts. I want to tear down the establishment and start afresh. We are not here to conform with your Fabian and socialist views to comply.
If your idea of strategy is endlessly watering down what needs to happen so you can stay “electable,” that’s your problem — not ours.
🚨This is exactly why I was never going to support @RestoreBritain.
This is the 100th example this year of the little difference between Restore and @reformparty_uk Policies.
The fundamental difference is Reform is an established political party with a presence across the country. Restore is building from scratch with no possibility of winning the next GE.
Rupert also knows, he cannot move further to the right than @Nigel_Farage because he knows Britain is broadly a centre-right country. Any thing further right will limit the wider electorate and votes.
I hope this serves as a wake-up call for Restore supporters to seriously consider where their support can have the greatest political impact.
Britain is at a critical crossroads.
If you want political change, the question is not just what you believe in, but how you translate those beliefs into electoral representation.
British universities are advertising government-backed “interest-free” Sharia-compliant student finance (Alternative Student Finance) for 2026-27, using a Takaful mutual fund whose repayments are ring-fenced for future participants rather than the Treasury.
My questions on this:
1. What is the total cost to date (including consultancy, legal, Sharia certification, systems development and ongoing administration) of designing and implementing Alternative Student Finance, broken down by year and by organisation?
2.Which public bodies (DfE, Student Loans Company, Treasury, others) have been involved, and which officials or teams hold overall responsibility?
3. What is the precise legal basis for creating a separate, ring-fenced Takaful fund whose contributions never return to the Exchequer, and has the scheme been subject to equality impact assessment under the Equality Act 2010?
4. On what evidence of unmet demand, and after what consultation, was it decided that a faith-specific product was required rather than reforming the existing student loan system for everyone?
5. Will participants and non-participants make identical total contributions over the life of the scheme? If an “equivalent of interest” levy is applied to maintain parity, where is that documented and how is it calculated?
6. What modelling has been done of the fiscal impact of permanently ring-fencing repayments (i.e., the cost to the taxpayer of never recovering the capital/interest that would otherwise return to the public purse)?
7. Is the product open to any eligible student on the same terms, or are there practical or eligibility differences? What safeguards prevent non-religious opt-in purely for financial advantage?
8. Who appoints and oversees the independent Islamic Finance Supervisory Board that will certify compliance, and what is the cost and contractual basis of that arrangement?
9. Has any assessment been made of whether a parallel, faith-based funding stream creates a two-tier higher education finance system or differential treatment on the grounds of religion or belief?
https://t.co/e1iPLrcKsl
Englishness is ancestry.
It is the inheritance of a people — not a Home Office decision, not a census box, and not something you become because it’s convenient this month.
You cannot legislate or self-identify your way into an ethnicity.
Britain is not demanding the impossible. We are simply asking for the same basic standards that other functioning countries already enforce without apology.
Denmark treats asylum as temporary and refuses to turn its welfare system into an open invitation. Australia turns boats around and does not offer free healthcare or housing to people who arrive illegally. Japan deports overstayers rather than subsidising them, and only opens the door to those who fill real skill shortages. Singapore treats illegal entry as a crime and offers no free ride on the public purse.
No free NHS. No free housing. No cash for people who arrive without permission. Remove those who break the rules. Keep a narrow door open for the highly skilled who actually contribute.
That is not radical. It is ordinary practice in countries that still take their own citizens seriously. It is time we did the same. Elect us and we will make it happen.
The New Statesman ran a cover story about me and my friends in Restore Britain, which was far fairer than any prior piece by the Spectator, Telegraph, or Daily Mail.
The article casts us as the disgruntled sons of Nigel Farage, disappointed with our father and seeing his revolution through to its logical conclusion.
But it’s remarkable how much an accurate description of our characters reads like an endorsement:
“These men – Christian, state-school educated – are unknown outside the online right. Yet they have become some of the most influential people in right-wing politics.”
“They dress formally and call each other “patriot” the same way a leftist might say “comrade”. Their references span the Old Testament, Marcus Aurelius and the video game Skyrim. They have a trollish streak, but many are Christian and morally serious; they advocate marriage and fret about degeneracy. They are sterner than their online personalities suggest.”
Despite Restore polling at between 3 and 8 per cent, author Emily Lawford writes: “There is evidence that these men are pushing the country’s political centre of gravity further right”.
Emily even described how I arrived at our interview with my wife, “him in a suit and tie, her a summer dress. Mrs Tomlinson (her husband asked that I don’t name her) brought a gift: a slice of freshly baked Victoria sponge. She watched, smiling, as her husband told me about his journey into the radical right.”
If the far right are young, presentable parents baking cakes and having conversations about how to fix the country, then sign me up.
Charlie Downes regularly reminds me, Harrison Pitt, and Lewis Brackpool that “It’s us, there’s no one else.”
Carl Benjamin insists he has “never been more convinced that essentially our victory is inevitable, as the horrors of multiculturalism become clear.”
With articles like this, I’m starting to believe them.
Is @policylaila advocating for large-scale social housing projects in London?
Just how socialist and left-wing can @reformparty_uk get?
We should be doing the exact opposite.
Knocking down the vile, post-Attlee, brutalist social housing estates across London.
Slashing public spending.
Bringing down taxes.
Cutting red tape to allow charities and businesses to build more homes.
Have remigration thus easing pressure on housing demand, bring down prices and free up more homes.
Zero ideological grounding. Zero consistency.
Our latest Restore Britain prospective parliamentary candidate announcement - Charlie Downes in Sittingbourne and Sheppey.
I look forward to visiting Kent again to help get Charlie into Parliament. We can win this seat, and many others in the county.
Covid, Ukraine, Iran.
If the last six years have taught us anything, it’s that we need to exploit our own natural resources and reduce dependency on imports in critical sectors.
Banning new North Sea drilling after the economic shocks since 2020 is a suicidal policy both economically and for national security.
The British public are sick to death of politicians deliberately undermining our national wellbeing. Restore Britain will reverse this ban and exploit the full natural resources of our nation.
When a Muslim Brotherhood member wins a Senate race, that’s NOT DEMOCRACY; that’s USEFUL IDIOTS hating their own country. When the mullahs in Iran took over, socialists helped them, and later, the Islamists killed them all. This is the most dangerous moment for Western civilization. GOD BLESS AMERICA.
U.S. Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed is a dark chapter in this great nation’s history.
And as the Bible warns:
“For whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.” — Galatians 6:7 (KJV)
Be careful what you plant in the name of democracy. You may not enjoy the harvest.
NIGEL FARAGE'S BASTARDS by @emilylawford
Two years ago, Connor Tomlinson, Charlie Downes and Harrison Pitt met Rupert Lowe at a private seminar organised by the late Peter Whittle, who ran the New Culture Forum, a right-wing think tank. Lowe gave a speech, arguing that they should still back Reform. He then sat for an hour with the young men, listening to their criticism of Farage. This was a multi-millionaire, Thatcherite, public-schooled farmer, giving an audience to young men with whom he had very little in common and about whose lives he knew nothing. “But he listened,” Tomlinson remembered, “and he just said, ‘Right, you know what lads, I’ll take all those criticisms on board. I think they’ll strengthen the party. You’re the exact kind of guys we want to get involved.’”
Tomlinson thought Lowe was a man of principle, compared to other figures in Reform whom he saw as power-mad and dishonest. He found Reform’s increasingly campy vibe distasteful when the country was collapsing. “I went to a lot of caravan holidays as a kid, right? I know that there’s a place for it in British culture. But I don’t think when we’re staring down the gun barrel of complete national disaster, the Butlins and fireworks and Andrea Jenkyns singing in sequins is the way to go.”
When Lowe was kicked out of Reform a few months later, Tomlinson was ready to follow him anywhere. “What Rupert Lowe realises,” Tomlinson said, “is there is a next generation of people who are essentially autodidacts, who haven’t been through the Eton, Oxbridge, Spad, MP, Lords pipeline that’s generated nothing but cowards and traitors.”
Carl Benjamin told me he was certain that Restore would triumph eventually. “I’ve never been more convinced that essentially our victory is inevitable, as the horrors of multiculturalism become clear.” Yet as Restore kept eating into Reform’s vote share, people began to call for the right to unite. In early August, after Restore came fourth with 9 per cent in the Greater Manchester mayoral election, Lowe suggested his party and Reform “put our differences aside and cooperate for the good of the country”. He demanded a few things in return: mass deportation of illegal migrants “including women and children”, a referendum on the death penalty, and “the exclusion of former Tory ministers from any future cabinet”. Farage prevaricated, saying he was open to talks, but it quickly descended into a spat. Reform demanded Lowe get rid of Downes, citing concerns about “antisemitic and extreme racists at or near the top of the party”. Lowe refused to sack “a young Christian man”, and the deal fell apart.
Tomlinson blamed the deal collapsing on Reform. “Interpersonally, I like Farage,” he said, “but also I’m just pissed off when he goes around calling my friends fascists.” He wasn’t surprised Lowe backed Downes: “Rupert stands by his men.” Yet there is another reason Lowe did not agree to the demands. Had he accepted, many of his supporters would have followed Downes and other young influencers to whatever new venture they decided to back.
Lowe is not all that different from Farage. Both are wealthy, public-school boomers (69 and 62, respectively) and Tory supporters who are instinctively pro-Thatcher, pro-markets and anti-immigration. Yet the young men who once clung to Farage are from a different world: radicalised by the internet, the job market, the diversifying and declining high street. They are fiscally apathetic and culturally extreme. Think of them as the new, new right.
Over the past six months, I’ve spoken to dozens of these men. (Although there are a few high-profile female provocateurs, this world is overwhelmingly male.) They dress formally and call each other “patriot” the same way a leftist might say “comrade”. Their references span the Old Testament, Marcus Aurelius and the video game Skyrim. They have a trollish streak, but many are Christian and morally serious; they advocate marriage and fret about degeneracy. And they are transforming politics in this country.
Cover art by Nate Kitch