Grim

Too much cherry

[Grim @Tyods_455]

@siri_us_ly @dowdybaloney So, really. It's a contradiction, which you fail to reply to.

[Grim @Tyods_455]

@siri_us_ly @dowdybaloney It's just proof that you can't prove yourself. You're asserting the idea that you've already made your point, but can't. Because you've made two claims; two statements.
One denies that intent can be established; the other asserts it with absolute certainty.

[Grim @Tyods_455]

@siri_us_ly @dowdybaloney You didn't provide shit.

[Grim @Tyods_455]

@siri_us_ly @dowdybaloney >You claim that she is 100% lying
But
>Claims uncertainty to my claim that she isn't lying.

That means that your earlier claim fails, because if there is uncertainty, then claiming 100%, is logically inaccurate.

[Grim @Tyods_455]

@siri_us_ly @dowdybaloney Hm?

Wait, you literally said a week ago that you believed she is 100% a liar. If there is no room for doubt or suspicion to that assumption, then the term "uncertain" would mean that there is still a chance for them not to have lied.

So, you're not making yourself clear here.

[Grim @Tyods_455]

@moch1sweet ???
How is this relevant

[Grim @Tyods_455]

@JAMsandwich4100 @yoserwano Whatever she experienced or not, it's still best to support them as a human being.

[Grim @Tyods_455]

@JAMsandwich4100 @yoserwano It can't. It's mostly allegations.
I never claimed that she is telling the truth, or that her document proves her allegations.

You're confusing my reply with a combatative one. I do side with Ren. It's not because I have proof, but because it's still unclear.

[Grim @Tyods_455]

@JAMsandwich4100 @yoserwano I have no sweet clue on how this proves the main allegation.

All it offers are just chatlogs.

[Grim @Tyods_455]

@siri_us_ly @dowdybaloney I don't need to provide evidence, if you're the one accusing it.

[Grim @Tyods_455]

@siri_us_ly @dowdybaloney You claimed that you offered proof, which I denied because it isn't proof to disprove that she didn't lie. It's just to discredit her. You were the person who CLAIMED that she lied.

[Grim @Tyods_455]

@siri_us_ly @dowdybaloney You're failing to structure your argument.

[Grim @Tyods_455]

@siri_us_ly @dowdybaloney Your opinion does not change how you are able to conclude that she is 100% a liar, while avoiding giving proof that are unequivocally true. Since you're claiming that she is lying which attacks her reputations, and the fact that you're using it to argue. You have to provide proof

[Grim @Tyods_455]

@siri_us_ly @dowdybaloney No you didn't. You said you would give informations that would discredit her, not outright prove that she lied, as you previously claimed beforehand.

[Grim @Tyods_455]

@McYeetington @sillydilly19624 @siri_us_ly @dowdybaloney According to her testimony, she only started to document the situation somewhen between December to early January.

Her main accusation rests within the scope of what she had remembered during those moments. It's not some kind of chatlogs you can easily look back to.

[Grim @Tyods_455]

@McYeetington @sillydilly19624 @siri_us_ly @dowdybaloney This is obviously because of how BPD handles situations when someone tries to recall on memories. There's no other reason why you should justifiably use "malevolent phrasing" to describe someone's actions.

[Grim @Tyods_455]

@McYeetington @sillydilly19624 @siri_us_ly @dowdybaloney "Omission galore" is a huge step from simply saying that she omitted some. I would like for you to prove that.

"Malevolent phrasing" is not at all appropriate to use when, circumstantially, Ren perceives the incident as horrific and is only trying to advocate what happened.

[Grim @Tyods_455]

@siri_us_ly @dowdybaloney You CAN prove a lie. There's just nothing wrong with being objective. An asteroid has an improbable chance of hitting you. Saying that it "might hit you," is statistically incorrect.

Even if you extrapolate, you can't conclude that someone is a liar with 100% certainty.