Empowering developers with AI #unit_testing & #mocking framework for .NET & C++ #Agile . Now featuring insights from our CEO’s book, AIcracy: Beyond Democracy.
AI can generate 20 unit tests in seconds.
But if 15 test essentially the same thing, did we really get 20 tests?
More tests ≠ more confidence.
Software Testing Magazine on the growing duplicate-test problem:
https://t.co/UtL6FF3exV
AI can generate tests faster than ever.
But passing tests + high coverage ≠ good tests.
Every PR should ask:
✓ Does this test add value?
✓ Is it isolated?
✓ Is it maintainable?
Code review became essential. Test Review is next.
https://t.co/dtl9lsfoqO
A green build tells you your tests passed.
It doesn't tell you whether the new tests improved your software.
That's a different review.
https://t.co/1Wb1ygn7Ld
We've optimized test generation for years.
The next challenge is test validation.
Not "Did the tests pass?"
But "Did they improve confidence?"
https://t.co/gpAVYItFCx
We refactor duplicate production code.
Why don't we refactor duplicate tests?
As test suites grow—and AI writes more of them—that question becomes increasingly important.
https://t.co/NjEWpY3ma5
Not every passing test adds value.
Duplicate tests slow CI, increase maintenance, and make failures noisier.
Sometimes deleting tests improves software quality.
https://t.co/NjEWpY3ma5
"Works on my machine."
One of the most expensive phrases in software development.
Hidden dependencies are a major cause of flaky tests.
https://t.co/agAV6gDHlg
A unit test shouldn't care about:
📁 Files
🌐 Networks
🕒 Time
🖥️ Machine configuration
If it does, it's probably not as isolated as you think.
https://t.co/agAV6gDHlg
What’s New in AI & Software Testing 🧵
A few developments worth watching:
🤖 AI-generated unit tests are becoming a commodity.
🔍 The conversation is shifting from “Can AI write tests?” to “Can we trust the tests AI writes?”
🛠️ Visual Studio continues to deepen AI integration:
https://t.co/vMMcASXp2z
🧪 GitHub Copilot is expanding AI-assisted testing for .NET:
https://t.co/txW0LVNLIn
💻 C++ developers are also getting more AI-native tooling:
https://t.co/03i2D7ubAZ
Our takeaway:
The next wave of innovation won’t just be generating tests-it’ll be reviewing, validating, and improving them.
What recent AI or testing development caught your attention?
#dotnet #cpp #testing #AI #GitHubCopilot
AI can generate 100 unit tests in minutes.
That doesn't mean all 100 improve your test suite.
The future isn't just AI-generated tests.
It's AI-reviewed tests.
https://t.co/6HSwnThdiT
Nice to see independent industry publications covering Typemock Isolator++ 5.4.5.
The release brings Visual Studio 2026 support, broader Linux compiler compatibility, improved code coverage, and better support for testing complex C++ applications.
Thanks to SD Times and Software Testing Magazine for the coverage.
SD Times:
https://t.co/QEWjAXAPhr
Software Testing Magazine:
https://t.co/YSPgq4SFJA
#cpp #cplusplus #UnitTesting #SoftwareTesting
90% code coverage sounds great.
But coverage measures execution, not confidence.
The real question is:
Can you trust the tests behind that number?
https://t.co/WuhrEISN5B
A green build doesn't necessarily mean a trustworthy test suite.
Passing tests ≠ quality tests.
It's time we started reviewing our tests, not just our code.
https://t.co/1km9Y9GRxz
AI made generating tests easy.
Knowing which tests are worth keeping is the new challenge.
Great to see both SD Times and DevOps Digest highlight this problem in their coverage of Typemock Test Review.
https://t.co/1km9Y9GjI1
#testing#dotnet#unittesting#ai
AI made generating unit tests easy.
The next challenge isn't writing more tests.
It's knowing which tests actually deserve your trust.
Introducing TypeMock Test Review.
https://t.co/1km9Y9GRxz