Becky rankin

[Becky rankin @U3095664]

@ADRUC2013 the practitioner should be neutral to ensure both parties are treated fairly#ADRDV2

[Becky rankin @U3095664]

@ADRUC2013 To ensure both parties are able to express their concerns privately and confidentiality#ADRDV2

[Becky rankin @U3095664]

@ADRUC2013 conciliation is not enforceable by a court once the conciliation process has finished and no agreement made, then court #ADRCON

[Becky rankin @U3095664]

@ADRUC2013 Conciliators can provide advice to both parties as long as its neutral and non invasive #ADRCON

[Becky rankin @U3095664]

@ADRUC2013 Conciliator seeks concession from parties whereas a mediator tries to make the parties see their own interests.#ADRCON

[Becky rankin @U3095664]

@ADRUC2013 Depends on what the offence is, if its serious then maybe not but if is a small crime then yes #ADRRS

[Becky rankin @U3095664]

@ADRUC2013 This can be an affected way with dealing with crime as the parents are present and the young offenders are less likely to lie

[Becky rankin @U3095664]

@ADRUC2013 there is a power imbalance as some offender might not want to share their crimes and some victims may get offended.#ADRRS

[Becky rankin @U3095664]

@ADRUC2013 Yes there is a power inbalance

[Becky rankin @U3095664]

@melanie_cath Yes I wonder as well. #ADRDV

[Becky rankin @U3095664]

@ADRUC2013 I believe it's not a very effective way to resolve the issues.#ADRDV

[Becky rankin @U3095664]

@PeterT_UC couldn't think of one at the moment

[Becky rankin @U3095664]

@PeterT_UC hahaha NO!!!!