U49624

[U49624 @U49624]

@Garnet_2203 Archaic and bureaucratic Freedom of Information regimes shouldn't exist in 2026. Everything gov't generates should be accessible on public web servers searchable by ai immediately and transparently.

[U49624 @U49624]

@lindayaX @globeandmail It's very unprofessional 'journamalism...'

[U49624 @U49624]

@grok @dubsy54321 @Tablesalt13 I would say that @dubsy54321 is missing some perspective then with their above post

[U49624 @U49624]

@dubsy54321 @Tablesalt13 @grok did Zohran Mamdani make the same gesture?

[U49624 @U49624]

@Demosthenes9_1 @wakawaka6828 @elonmusk This sounds rigged. So much for a free market. Also the X reply button is very hard to find, why is it not integrated into every post so we can reply to the right one? @elonmusk

[U49624 @U49624]

@wavetossed @BarryESharp @sflorimm Good statement. I can usually tell when it's ai.

[U49624 @U49624]

@ArthurMacwaters They sure got a lot of evil into Canadians in the Frequency Game Simulations (3) tho!!

[U49624 @U49624]

@KootenayPe @DanMazierMP It's a pointless post tho, as he's part of her Majesty's loyal opposition, and the Crown has its prerogative!

[U49624 @U49624]

@DanMazierMP Unfortunately you are her Majesty's loyal opposition, and can do nothing. Cest la vie. Crown prerogative

[U49624 @U49624]

@cbcwatcher The translation. "I don't know, I dont care, cest la vie. Now where's the free booze"

[U49624 @U49624]

@grok @ChrisCaddel @Tablesalt13 @NorthOfNonsense Very helpful. Seems most Canadians (who operate under a different sort of "Crown law") do not have any understanding on USA law

[U49624 @U49624]

But go into more how Congress gets involved at treaty terminations. Is it bc this unilateral clause is in the treaty that the executive can do so with USMCA? Or another reason? Was USMCA ratified by the senate what was the history? What about something like a theoretical NATO withdrawal wrt Congress?

[U49624 @U49624]

**No, it's overstated hype.**

USMCA Article 34.6 lets any party withdraw with 6 months' written notice — this was **already in NAFTA** (Article 2205). Trump didn't "add" a new unilateral termination right.

What he *did* push for in 2017-18 negotiations was the review/sunset clause (Art. 34.7): mandatory joint reviews every 6 years + automatic termination after 16 years (2036) unless extended. This creates built-in leverage points to renegotiate or exit.

Today (June 10, 2026) Trump said he's "not looking to renew" it at the July 2026 review and praised the termination mechanism. Smart leverage play on his part, but not secret 4D chess spanning a decade. The video claim inflates a standard negotiation win.

[U49624 @U49624]

@ChrisCaddel @Tablesalt13 @NorthOfNonsense @grok is this true WRT USMCA termination clause?

[U49624 @U49624]

@TangerineHelps Thank you. Please advise why you future date transactions and your call notes?

[U49624 @U49624]

.@TangerineHelps .@Tangerinebank Frustrating bank CS call today: Rude, unintelligible agent wrongly claimed my 2FA was on, ignored my prior hack attempt note + liability warning, then hung up. Follow-up rep Khalet had zero notes, slow-walked my complaint, and needed supervisor escalation just to log it (email coming). Meanwhile, routine $20.30 savings-to-CC transfer processed fine. Now pushing to add proper 2FA + fingerprint auth. This level of service on security issues is unacceptable.

[U49624 @U49624]

@TangerineHelps @TangerineBank Please advise why you future date transactions and notes as well.

[U49624 @U49624]

@TangerineBank @TangerineHelps .@tangerinebank .@TangerineHelps

[U49624 @U49624]

@TangerineBank @TangerineHelps Your customer service is the lowest of the low.

[U49624 @U49624]

@TangerineBank @TangerineHelps @elonmusk @JeffBezos

[U49624 @U49624]

@Tybernicus17 @TangerineHelps Tangerine customer service is awful and they don't take notes of calls. They often make unintelligible and rude comments. @TangerineHelps @TangerineBank @elonmusk @JeffBezos