@pavelibarrameda@robjonesreports Look no further than his support of Russia when the Ukraine crisis began. Also can’t help but wonder how he managed to get Inman and Oke Shannon without some inside help. 🤔
@joel_schectman@PressClubDC@aviswanatha You sold your soul and torched your credibility…for a National Press Club Award? Please tell me you’re getting more than that, otherwise this is a pretty pathetic deal.
@tinyklaus I love the show and I respect you and @libertybirb, but I think you have been making connections that I’m not sure are there. Is there any indication Spielberg knew Epstein? Does having a deplorable boss automatically make you deplorable? I just need a little more evidence.
@BobMcGwier_N4HY@chrisbledsoeufo I’m very intrigued by the “tail” coming off of the “O” on the right that loops back up (and maybe around?). Perhaps that can tell us something about the method of communication someday.
In response to my request for an On the Record meeting with @RTCACapitolHill after a month and a half of them illegally shutting my Bureau down, they responded that they'll only meet with me Off the Record.
How dare these TV Networks - @scrippsnews@ABC@Disney@CNN@NBCNews@MSNOWNews demand transparency from a subject ever again.
I'm now demanding to be put in touch with each of their legal departments and their personal lawyers.
If only there had been legislation calling for a civilian UAP declassification group, we wouldn’t have to go through all this advisory board nonsense…. #ufotwitter
@TheUfoJoe I’m still searching for what Jacques Vallee was referring to in this entry from Forbidden Science 5:
“27 September 2002.
Kit [Green] did mention a group that includes @ChrisKMellon, involved with advanced aeronautics and ‘infotainment.’”
Sounds like TTSA…15 years prior?
@libertybirb Can I just ask why it’s immediately disqualifying to ask a billionaire to fund a project that’s going to cost a lot of money? Don’t we want billionaires to use their wealth for things like this?
Mr. Mellon,
While many, including myself, appreciate your tenacity here, this is a perplexing tweet...
You are calling for the release of UAP space data, satellite data, and detection from the Ballistic Missile Early Warning System; however, you yourself have commented on several occasions on the existence of both the legacy programs and recovered materials/biological samples.
The number one example that comes to mind is this redacted Signal messaging screenshot you released in 2024 in response to Sean Kirkpatrick voluntarily offering Signal exchanges between you and him for a FOIA release.
This redacted exchange with an unknown individual not only confirms you know the management structure, security control systems, and ownership of the crash retrieval portfolio, but that you are also aware of a highly classified memo by SecAF in the 1950s that is still in effect to maintain cover for the legacy programs.
Indeed, you also in this exchange confirm you are aware of the Air Force legacy SES-2 gatekeeper (likely Russel E. Wyler) and state the 1953 Kingman, Arizona UFO crash was indeed real and recovered.
So why exactly is this memo by a former SecAF or the release of the Kingman wreckage and biologics not a priority for you? These have lower precedence than your listed IMINT/SIGINT data?....
You have said similar things on several occasions regarding UFO retrieval and exploitation, including a 2023 NewsNation appearance with Chris Cuomo where you stated: "I’ve been told that we have recovered technology that did not originate on this Earth, by officials in the Department of Defense and by former intelligence officials."
https://t.co/Bnin6fajhK
This feels like a bizarre pivot back to your and Mr. Elizondo's ~ 2017-2023 narrative of discussing an amorphous non-human presence on this planet without breaking into the fine details of recovered technical vehicles or biologics.
At the same time, I find it bizarre that your list is excluding maritime UFO sensor data encounters. We know, all the way back to the days of Project Blue Book, USO/maritime UFO encounters are often strikingly anomalous and occur almost more frequently than any space-based UFO monitoring and tracking.
Others and I share the concern that within the Age of Disclosure documentary, Jay Stratton, who retired as a Defense Intelligence Senior Executive (DISES) from the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI), purposefully excluded Navy elements from the film's "Legacy Program" outline to protect his Naval interest or prior exposure to Naval Legacy Elements. Mr. Mellon, are you doing the same? Admiral Gallaudet has advocated for the study of UFO/USO in maritime environments tirelessly. Why do you not also advocate for release of such data?
An additional worthy pursuit, as I have publicly requested, is for you to comment on your former SSCI coworker, Mary K. Sturtevant. As I have stated, I am aware that whilst Sturtevant was Lockheed Martin VP of Government Affairs and VP for Intelligence, Joint and Science & Technology Progams, she aided in the blocking of the Kona Blue PSAP UFO materials transfer between Lockheed Martin and the AAWSAP. My public request to you can be found here:
https://t.co/gAD3Lv6R6V
Why is UFO retrieval, exploitation, and reverse engineering, for which you have advocated transparency in the past, taking a backseat to a handful of specific sensor data?
So I guess the new mystery is who told @AlchemyAmerican the same story @JeremyCorbell told about the UFO on its way to earth? It’s time to name names, fellas. You two know who told you. It’s not a breach of trust if it was built on a lie. So it’s time to tell the rest of us.