Eric W

Skeptic and rationalist

[Eric W @UAPSkepticEric]

@TheMysteryWire What’s in the files that is interesting and beyond what has been revealed already?

[Eric W @UAPSkepticEric]

@UAPodcast850 Disclosure at a price? I thought were close when Age of Disclosure came out. Then tranche 1. Then tranche 2-4. Then Disclosure Day and more tranches.

[Eric W @UAPSkepticEric]

@scosol @DrBeaVillarroel Thanks. There must be a scientific way to determine how many objects would be needed to cause the number captured

[Eric W @UAPSkepticEric]

@DrBeaVillarroel I have a genuine question about the study. Why do you think there are so many objects in it? Wouldn’t stronger evidence of UAP be some but not the large number you found. The idea that there would be that many in orbit seems unlikely.

[Eric W @UAPSkepticEric]

@DrBeaVillarroel @DrBeaVillarroel how many actual UAPs would there be needed in the sky to produce an outcome of these numbers?

[Eric W @UAPSkepticEric]

Doesn’t it make more sense that the trap was set for foreign drones? If the know the types of things these drones like to harass or spy on, and then they set up those types of things to try to down them - that makes a lots more sense. If NHI can travel across star systems, or through dimensions, then how could they just be shot down?

[Eric W @UAPSkepticEric]

@QuintessenceEli I guesss you guys will have to pay his speaking fee @jaystratton clearly wants to get on the right side of disclosure (the paying side!)

[Eric W @UAPSkepticEric]

@UAPReportingCnt That YouTuber has a bias to believe in the UAP stuff. He covers it often.

[Eric W @UAPSkepticEric]

@UFOExposer @MickWest What’s that have to do with Strattons book?

[Eric W @UAPSkepticEric]

@AshtonForbes If you want to make something totally not possible sound possible… says it’s quantum 🤣

[Eric W @UAPSkepticEric]

@SicCoP1 Because the @DeptofWar is ok with letting us believe that they are UAPs

[Eric W @UAPSkepticEric]

@JKoopmans329237 @MiddleOfMayhem @ericweinstein Ok so he is better than math at me. It doesn’t mean he is qualified to be talking about the future of AI or UFOs

[Eric W @UAPSkepticEric]

@SicCoP1 @MiddleOfMayhem @POTUS @ProfAviLoeb Are you adding the same comment to garbage like this? I don’t see @ProfAviLoeb correcting these articles

[Eric W @UAPSkepticEric]

I wonder a lot about motivations. Take Bob Lazar. Do you think he is lying? Was he part of a psyop? Are those the only two choices? It’s similar to Grush. I don’t think either have benefited financially, at least to a strong degree. Neither or rich. Thought?

[Eric W @UAPSkepticEric]

@BillyKryzak Another disclosure window is closing.

[Eric W @UAPSkepticEric]

@MiddleOfMayhem @SicCoP1 Has @POTUS ever mentioned or even alluded to the science council or @ProfAviLoeb ?

[Eric W @UAPSkepticEric]

@rosscoulthart @MattLaslo @DeptofWar has no desire to let us know that. It could lead to a war. Instead, they would rather refer to them as UAP. Better that is discussed on @NewsNation then the Chinese alternative being discussed on the other news networks.

[Eric W @UAPSkepticEric]

@TheUfoJoe What’s the issue with what @MickWest posted? He is pointing that out, because many in the community like to point out that a book (or statements) is DOPSR cleared then it means that it is accurate. It doesn’t mean anything like that.

[Eric W @UAPSkepticEric]

@VettedPodcast This guy right here