This Friday, @ChloeJSKennedy outlines the argument in her recent book, Inducing Intimacy: we should consult the genealogy of legal responses to deceptively induced sexual and romantic relationships when evaluating how the law regulates such conduct: https://t.co/xsWL87vlSx
This Friday, @Adam_J_Kolber argues: in our current non-ideal world, carceral punishment is better addressed through pure consequentialism (i.e. denying the value of deserved punishment) than standard retributivism (where moral desert justifies punishment): https://t.co/ZmotzZU65W
And here it is: @should_b_workin's post on whether actions can manifest traits or attitudes that are not actually present: https://t.co/jxlmp2wYSz Enjoy!
In our next post, @should_b_workin argues that, to a limited extent, the criminal law can fairly take D’s actions to manifest traits or attitudes even when we know that D does not actually possess them! Under what conditions? Find out this Friday on https://t.co/xsWL87vTI5!
@ValerijZisman's post on Empirical Research into the Psychology of Punishment is now live on our blog, Check it out at https://t.co/LmisSXpLA4. Comments and questions welcome!
In our next post, coming Friday, Valerij Zisman (of @MPICSL) discusses the use of empirical research in human psychology on punishment theory. He say that it can be a very important yardstick to assess ethical and legal theories, but we must use it more carefully. Watch for that!
Here is @markedsouza1's post on why AI entities can never be treated as responsible agents anything that is recognisably a system of criminal laws. https://t.co/67LBCFwB0P Comments/reactions welcome!
Here is @markedsouza1's post on why AI entities can never be treated as responsible agents anything that is recognisably a system of criminal laws. https://t.co/67LBCFwB0P Comments/reactions welcome!
In our next post, this Friday, @markedsouza1 argues against recent suggestions that the criminal law should consider treating AI entities as autonomous agents, capable of being criminal defendants in their own rights. Look out for that!
With apologies for the delay in this notification, this post by @levinguever is now live! Here's the direct link: https://t.co/swXlqhkiY9 Comments and questions welcome!
🚨 CFA for The Collective's Work-in-Progress Seminar
We are inviting abstracts (max. 500 words) via this webform: https://t.co/W7gEPuZWix. The closing date for this round is Friday the 29th of November 2024, 5pm (EST), with invitations being extended soon thereafter.
In our next post, this Friday, @levinguever counters suggestions that some deviations b/w criminal law and morality are ok. He says (a) factors favouring supra-moral criminalisation can be overstated; and (b) we can regret even all-things-considered justified. Look out for that!
Structural Injustice & the Law co-edited w/
@JoWolffBSG coming out @UCLpress
https://t.co/ulBxC5Zi4f
With chapters by @lea_ypi@colmocinneide George Letsas @MaeveMckeown Hugh Collins @thebigbogg Nicola Lacey, Vanessa Munro @BethWatts494 Lynne McMordie, Jude Browne Guy Mundlak
Join us for the next UCL ILPP Dworkin Colloquium, where Dr Adam Etinson (@StAndrewsPhil) will be speaking about 'Anger and Remorse'.
📅 Tuesday 30 April
⏰ 3:00 pm–5:00 pm
👥 In person
https://t.co/6O30eWVBcF
The Correspondence of Jeremy Bentham, Volume 13 has been published today by @UCLpress#OpenAccess 📙
Edited by UCL’s Bentham Project, the volume publishes all known correspondence to and from Bentham from 1 July 1828 until his death on 6 June 1832
https://t.co/OVT5a80FNd
This week's UCL Spotlight is on Dr @TimCauser, Principal Research Fellow at the Bentham Project!
He talks about The Correspondence of Jeremy Bentham, Volume 13, published yesterday @UCLpress; his favourite albums; and which film he's appeared in 📽️
https://t.co/0Pu39D6WIp
This year's annual NOMOS conference is on 'Structural Injustice' at the University of Chicago in September. I'm acting as commentator to Sally Haslanger and much looking forward to it.
https://t.co/Kj0C1J7FKX