1
Anm.:
Karl Schlögel - Paulskirche - Friedenspreis
Überschriften
Aha, der "Putin-Kritiker" bekam den Preis; nicht der Autor lesenswerter Bücher schon in den achtziger Jahren?
I have re-read a brilliant op-ed by John Gaddis against NATO expansion in April 1998. All Cold War historians were against the expansion then. I would welcome an honest poll on this issue now, after a decade of war in Ukraine.
This video leaves a peculiar impression. Carlson’s dumb, entirely out-of-context adoration of Moscow vs Stewart’s hideously unfunny gimmicks. An ugly clash in which Russia, including Navalny’s death, is used as stage prop helping to advance mind-bogglingly simplistic narratives.
@anthroprofhage It’s an outrageous statement, typical of formulaic ones that German institutions feel compelled to issue if they think their funding will be cut.
Putin’s war has backfired in so many ways, but historically the breach he personally has caused btw Russians and Ukrainians (starting in 2014 if not earlier) is a catastrophic mistake to be measured in millennia. @RubyMellen @ZoeannMurphy https://t.co/5WI22bMfIs
In 2019, I gave a talk at Norwich Castle about W.G. Sebald's relationship to cinema. I mentioned Thomas Honickel's two rare films about him, though only in passing as they weren't available. They're now both online and subtitled.
https://t.co/PU08JCEUG5
https://t.co/bVVEC70y7t
He was just as likely as his friend Sidney Poitier to make a career out of being the first black male Hollywood star, but he hated the roles he was offered. And the films he pitched and produced didn't fit the racist conventions of the film industry. https://t.co/nabv6Gb6h9
Warum ich dieses Mal so niedergeschlagen wie zu Kriegsbeginn aus dem Osten der Ukraine zurückgekommen bin, habe ich drüben bei Facebook aufgeschrieben.
https://t.co/FtOk98fi6l