A dictator is someone who ignores elections and rules by violence. Zelensky meets that definition but Piers Morgan loves him anyway.
(0:00) Why Is Piers Morgan Deeply in Love With Zelensky?
(20:58) Zelensky Is Getting Rich From War
(25:29) Should NATO Be Abolished?
(36:48) Should the US Send Money to Israel?
(44:57) Should Putin Be Assassinated?
(46:30) The Morality of Nuclear War
(1:03:57) The Killing of Christians Around the World
(1:11:32) Is Piers Happier After Leaving Corporate Media?
(1:14:28) Why Gun Control Fails
(1:22:01) Does the UK Have Free Speech?
(1:31:15) Why Are World Leaders Trying to Reduce the Population?
(1:35:59) Piers’ Thoughts on Donald Trump
Includes paid partnerships.
Wir bekommen Menschen geschenkt, sagten sie, wertvoller als Gold. Wir brauchen all diese Facharbeiter, sagten sie. Diese Leute werden einmal unsere Renten sichern, sagten sie. Wir sind überaltert, wir brauchen frisches Blut, sagten sie. Jetzt sagen dieselben Leute, mindestens 30 % der sogenannten "Flüchtlinge" hätten "Psychische Probleme", wir bräuchten zehntausende Therapieplätze zusätzlich, wir bräuchten viel mehr Integrationskurse, wir müssten noch mehr Geld in die Hand nehmen. Dabei sind es jetzt schon Milliarden und Abermilliarden. Ihr habt nur gelogen, von früh bis spät, die Rechten hatten von Anfang an mit allem recht, und ich hoffe es noch zu erleben, wie mit euch ein für allemal abgerechnet wird.
Tja bei uns werden mitten am Tag familienväter vor den Augen von Kindern abgestochen kann man halt nix machen ne die Gesellschaft ist jetzt halt bunter aber schaut hin der hat in Amerika den Arm komisch ausgestreckt oh nein die Welt geht unter Hilfe
I remember that experiment done by a woman named Norah Vincent, who had this exact line of thinking.
Norah Vincent hatched the idea that she was going to disguise herself as a man and infiltrate male-only spaces to finally "expose" how awful and dastardly men were.
When the experiment was over, she had a complete change of heart, realized just how awful most men were treated, how much they were hurting, and went around giving interviews basically saying "men are suffering and we need to help them." She wrote a whole book on her experience called "Self-Made Man" and it's an absolutely fascinating read.
She was a staunch "grrr men are evil and bad raaaah" feminist. The whole point of her experiment was to try and expose men, and she came away with the exact opposite opinion.
Feminists who say shit like this have absolutely no clue what men go through, what we experience, and what our lives our like. They've been poisoned by feminism to such an absurd degree that they're almost beyond saving.
Feminists who say this would not last two weeks living the life of a man. They would curl up in the fetal position begging for their mommy and beg to be a woman again.
“Explain to me why the one guy that was leading rallies to call out the systemic rape of children was getting locked up and silenced and put in jail. Why weren’t you doing it? Why wasn’t the UK government doing it? Why weren’t the cops doing it?”
Tim Pool questions why Piers Morgan and the critics of Tommy Robinson didn’t do more to expose and prevent the brutal abuse of innocent children.
FULL RESPONSE: https://t.co/Cx8yg3tuYM
@OERRBlog Das liegt vielleicht einfach daran das er den größten Account auf X hat, mit knapp 200 Mio. Followern und das die meisten seiner Tweets relativ erfolgreich sind und viele Interaktionen haben
Well done @jordanbpeterson for speaking so lucidly and forthrightly on the lack of dignity that Britain holds for itself and the English girls who were allowed to be victimised by foreign rape gangs in the name of diversity and multiculturalism.
@Bliobleheris@VDAREJamesK It's possible, but it is a huge hassle to get a license.
The easiest way is to be a hunter.
If you are a normal citizen, you basically have to lie that you are a hunter, and you have to keep the lie up the whole time.
@ChibiReviews I had to drop reading the LN of Redo of Healer after the MC pretty much got his revenge on everyone. After that it was just chapter after chapter of him having Sex with his harem, lol.
The H1B debate is one of the most fascinating pieces of discourse in 2024, a humiliating defeat for the Musk, tech bros, and “Elite Human Capital”.
But how did this happen? Basically because one party did not understand the nature of modern politics.
On the surface “more H1Bs” is the classic slam-dunk technocrat policy idea. No doubt Elon was counting on this.
Big tech likes it. Big Gov likes it, libertarians and leftists like it. The only people who don’t like it are disorganized middle Americans who can’t follow arguments and are easily distracted.
So what better way to get this policy through than a big push on Christmas when most middle American Chuds we’re carving their Christmas goose? Worst comes to worst, you just offer a minor retraction. H1B visas aren’t even an issue Red America cares about so no one would get too angry. Right?
Wrong. Elon didn’t count on a few critical realities that had changed since this H1B-visa policy first emerged as a real political issue.
The first new reality Elon didn’t count on was that economic case for H1Bs was WAY weaker than it was in the 90s/2000s. In 2024, America was not in the middle of a “tech boom” and for the last decade highly skilled natives had a very hard time finding jobs, a situation made even more depressing by the constant threat of AI to remove certain low-level positions entirely.
It also didn’t help that America had more information about what H1Bs actually were. Propaganda about new “Einsteins” and VonBrauns” (the "0.1% of top TOP TALENT) being brought in from the H1B expansion were transparent bullshit, since exceptional genius were brought in under and entirely different system. Furthermore, it was easy to verify through public data that H1B visas were largely given to mid-tier entry level positions, the very jobs that middle class Americans felt locked out of. The only benefit being that the foreign employees worked for less money.
Further horror stories about how America was going to be “locked out” of a competitive market place by China and Russia were equally risible, since very notably these countries were not seeking to import a new tech elite.
Elon also didn’t realize that Americans had experience with these kind of immigrants that was not positive. This is an easy oversight of your brain is stuck in the 1990s where a “point based system” was the holy grail of immigration. But we tried the point system, at least in Canada, and the results are not stellar. Far from getting a new tech elite the country was just flooded with mid-skilled pushy immigrants whose economic benefit was immediately swamped by their catastrophic impact on the housing market and social services. To date, I haven't met a Canadian, even a Canadian liberal, who thinks the last decade of immigration from India has been a good thing. And for some reason, with all of this "high skilled immigration" Canada didn't become the new Silicon Valley either.
Ok, so maybe pushing this whole H1B visas was a bad move? A political mistep? But it needed one more ingredient to become a political catastrophe. For that you neeed hordes and hordes of brain dead liberal and indian midwits, led by one paritcular indian midwit Vivek Ramaswamy.
This is always from the problem with arguments that seemed like "slam dunks" in the past, they attract an army of midget who argue for them without evidence just to seem like they are on the "winning side", smell-blind to their own bullshit. And this is more or less what happened to the defenders of H1B on Twitter. (Continued)
Übrigens hätte Elon Musk jedes Recht, den X-Algorithmus so zu schreiben, dass seine Tweets jedem Nutzer morgens als Weckerton vorgelesen werden. Es ist seine Plattform, die Nutzung ist freiwillig, in einer freien Gesellschaft darf er tun, was er will.
Dass er das nicht tut, sondern X in den USA erwiesenermaßen so ausgewogen ist wie noch nie und jeder hier seine freie Meinung äußern kann, ist ihm hoch anzurechnen. Wer etwas gegen Meinungsfreiheit hat, kann jederzeit die Plattform verlassen.
Wer sie aber verbieten oder maximal regulieren will, ist nichts weniger als ein totalitärer Feind westlicher Werte.