1. Shaykh Nizār recently gave an extensive answer on the situation related to al-Bukhārī and ʿArafāt. A full translation is underway. However, a few points that noteworthy to mention:
- Shaykh Nizār says that when ʿArafāt and his followers stirred Fitnah against ...
Like teacher, like student. You're just as opportunistic and deceptive as Arafat. Everyone saw how he entertained your rigged questions on X to frame Abu Iyaad, don't try to rewrite history now.
We respect the Ulama & we endorse the statement of Imam Ibn Asakir, rahimahullah. However, this respect does not prevent one from demanding one's rights, whether from a scholar or other prominent members of society.
https://t.co/mbiruqASFE
Shaykh ʿUbayd al-Jābirī (رحمه الله) in 2008:
Advice to the People of Yemen Regarding the Khārijites and Rebels and the Obligation to Support The Leader Against Them
Read more:
https://t.co/lydexCZHwF
NEW:
It is obligatory to beware of the callers to fitnah who encourage rebellion against the Muslim rulers.
— By Shaikh Salih al-Fawzan.
https://t.co/hVnj6C7EUK
Uncle, why are your direct responses to others on Twitter minimal?”
Response: They invite whataboutism, sentimentalism etc. We disengage when one behaves this way in person, so why entertain same behaviour online with one who we neither know nor ever met. Preserve your time.
Ahlus Sunnah Speak With One Voice In This Issue As Well As Other Issues of Aqeedah and Manhaj. May Allah Preserve And Bless Everyone Who Preserve These Mighty Principles Amin.
https://t.co/ZdZdQRdD9F
https://t.co/7gUVFl6hBF
Shaykh ʿAlī al-Ḥudhayfī:
Preservation of the Jamāʿah of Muslims and Its Security and Stability Is from the Sharīʿah Objectives
A clarification of claims made by al-Zaʿtarī regarding the issue of rebellion against the state.
Read more:
https://t.co/X7I8yykvj2
Some call it harsh, others call it stern. Regardless, let it sink in: O Tullab Al-Ilm in our era! If anyone thinks that their Ilm grants them impunity, let him keep it to himself. We have the guidance of the Salaf & senior Ulama. No amount of ‘ilm will excuse bad behaviour.
https://t.co/jDEEChMFk5
🚫 The Double Standards Surrounding Alhoeda Wa Noer’s @alhoedawanoer Fundraising Events and the Involvement of Certain Prominent Figures, Such as @DeQuran and @aboe_ayyoub
Shaykh Abū al-ʿAbbās Bilāl ibn ʿAbd al-Ghanī al-Sālimī, may Allāh preserve him, from Alexandria: his defence of the virtuous Shaykh Abū ʿIyāḍ Amjad Rafīq, and his counsel to the brothers in Britain.
A Testimony for Allāh: ʿArafāt al-Muḥammadī’s Revilement of ʿAllāmah al-Fawzān and Tabdīʿof Abū ʿIyaaḍ
by Muḥsin bin ʿAbd al-Razzāq al-Jabartī (وفقه الله)
English
https://t.co/u3Ifq0fxXx
Arabic
https://t.co/oTTQ4HspfN
More info
https://t.co/Aympe8gEOw
A Response to Anwar Wright
1. You said:
“No one openly defends him except unknowns, fools, and impressionable youth (and unfortunately some old).”
But is this statement even correct?
What about the mashāyikh who have openly defended Shaykh Amjad and/or spoken in support of the evidence being raised in this matter?
الشيخ علي الحذيفي
الشيخ نزار بن هاشم
الشيخ فواز المدخلي
الشيخ شهاب الدين بن حسن البنا
الشيخ بلال السالمي
الشيخ مجدي الشهري
Are you including these mashāyikh among the “unknowns, fools, and impressionable youth” you are referring to?
And if you are not including them, then how can you say that “no one openly defends him except” such people?
⸻
2. Even if those defending him were “unknown,” what does that prove?
Does someone being unknown make the evidence he presents incorrect?
The principle mentioned by the scholars is:
الحق لا يُعرف بالرجال، فإذا عُرف الحق عُرف أهله
“The truth is not known by men; rather, when the truth is known, its people are known.”
And it has been reported from ʿAlī ibn Abī Ṭālib رضي الله عنه:
لا تعرف الحق بالرجال، اعرف الحق تعرف أهله
“Do not know the truth by men; know the truth and you will know its people.”
If Shaykh Amjad has erred regarding Shaykh ʿAbdullāh al-Bukhārī, then identify the specific error, present his actual words fairly, and answer his evidence with evidence.
⸻
3. You said:
“There are others who have been known to display signs of mental instability. They all should continue to be ignored.”
How does this establish that Shaykh Amjad’s evidence is incorrect?
Calling people “fools,” “impressionable youth,” or saying that others have displayed “signs of mental instability” does not, in itself, answer the evidence they have presented.
And be careful concerning the honor of the Muslims. A person will answer for what he says concerning the honor of his Muslim brother.
⸻
4. You speak about arrogance and humility
You speak about arrogance and humility, yet where is the humility in demeaning Muslims simply because they defend a position you reject?
As for placing an individual at such a level that criticism of him is treated as though it is impermissible, while those who criticize him are belittled and insulted, then this is not from our daʿwah.
No individual is above correction when evidence establishes an error.
And after describing Muslims as “fools,” “impressionable youth,” and speaking of others as displaying “signs of mental instability,” remember that a person will answer for what he says concerning the honor of his Muslim brother.
Where will you run from this, Anwar? By Allah, the Messenger of Allah ﷺ said:
«الظُّلْمُ ظُلُمَاتٌ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ»
“Oppression will be darknesses on the Day of Resurrection.”
⸻
5. You lecture others about arrogance while defending ʿArafāt al-Muḥammadī
This is despite the serious criticisms that have been raised concerning his positions on foundations of the Sunnah.
If you believe those criticisms are incorrect, then answer the evidence with evidence. Do not divert the discussion into attacks upon everyone who raises these matters.
It was asked concerning ʿArafāt:
“Is Shaykh ʿAbdullāh al-Bukhārī more important to ʿArafāt al-Muḥammadī than the foundations of Ahl al-Sunnah?”
So we ask you the same question, Anwar:
Is defending Shaykh ʿAbdullāh al-Bukhārī more important to you than the foundations and principles of Ahl al-Sunnah that have been raised in this matter?
⸻
6. If you believe Shaykh Amjad is mistaken, bring the evidence
The truth is not determined by whether someone is famous or “unknown,” nor does insulting the person presenting an argument invalidate his evidence.
If Shaykh Amjad has made an error, demonstrate the error and answer the evidence.
May Allah guide us and you to the truth, grant us justice even toward those with whom we disagree, and protect our tongues from speaking without right.
@anwarphilly
So why didn't Abdullāh al-Bukhārī do this with Shaykh Abū Iyāḍ? In fact, he said to not let him inside his house, until he 'repented' from his 'speech against the scholars'. Now, why are we saying that which we do not do? Straight to tabdī' and name-calling him a plant!
Dr. Abdullah Khairi's comments regarding Salah Kantush's fatwa quoted and posted by Al-Adani bin Tahir (Shakib al-Adani).
Dr. Khairi hafidhahullah said: "Statement by the Transitional Council's Sheikhs and their followers supporting secession and their opposition to the fatwa of Sheikh Rabee' al-Madkhali and their opposition to the Coalition and Saudi Arabia"
Al-Adani bin Tahir (June 24, 2021) quoted/posted a fatwa from Salah Kantush where he stated ...
Answer:
"Waalaikum Assalam Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh.
May Allah keep you safe.
There used to be great goodness in the unity and oness of Yemen in the past especially regarding people's clearer and stronger understanding of the Sunnah upon the hands of Sheikh Muqbil al-Wadiee' rahimahullah taa'la
As for today, there is no good in its continuation/remaining (i.e. of Unity) due to the domination (control) of the Rafidhi Twelver Shi'a over the northern governorates (provinces), and separation is better for the South than continuing with it (Unity)" (End of quote)
*═══ ❁✿❁ ════*
Salafi Da'wah East Africa (Salafi Da'wah Afrika Mashariki)
https://t.co/hohShhs01c
Regardless of who holds this today & changes position tomorrow, and regardless of who supports or disassociates, remain constant on these principles and study the proofs without bias nor pressure from anyone.
https://t.co/Mi0miy3E4k
📒 Deceptions, Lies and Fallacies of Zakariya bin Shu'ayb in the Kenyan Seminar - Shaykh Ali Al-Hudheifi hafidhahullah.
DOWNLOAD & READ PDF ⬇️
LINK 1:
https://t.co/z0h2seRwht
LINK 2: https://t.co/AJQMSNQl0c
LINK 3 (audio):
https://t.co/w0tlIaSNqX
*Notes on typo and translation:*
》it's *O Zakariyah* and not Oh Zakariyyah
Any good and perfection in the translation is from Allah alone and any mistakes or shortcomings is from our sinful selves and shaytan.
For any suggestions, corrections or improvements on the translation - please do not hesitate to contact us on [email protected] or [email protected]
May Allah bless you and reward you.
Jazakum Allahu Khayran wa Baarak Allahu Feekum
*═══ ❁✿❁ ════*
Salafi Da'wah East Africa (Salafi Da'wah Afrika Mashariki)
https://t.co/hohShhs01c
Regarding the saying of Allāh (عز وجل) about al-Masjid al-Ḥarām: “And whoever intends (a deed) therein of deviation or wrongdoing, We will make him taste a painful punishment.” (22:25):