Cool product!
Only thing I’d correct is your assumption about Tessera openAI. It’s actually more openAI than what we currently have on the market available. Every single T token is 1:1 backed through chainlinkPOR with actual equity, and we use fireblocks custody. The upside or downside of the underlying equity, come liquidations, can be realized into the token by redemptions.
The loan agreement aspect of a T token is a very strong legal moat using SPVs VS the standard SPV model we see in the space where the underlying companies can actually reject in various ways.
$ZIRON // https://t.co/E9TewqoFCz
B8WvjPmz1wJ9xPRKEkyWHFzPZoaqkKWCytgtFjhTpump
A launchpad for assets that settle privately.
Coins launch on Solana, where the market is. Each burn settles to a shielded note on Zcash's Ironwood pool, where amounts, senders and recipients are hidden by zero-knowledge proofs rather than by mixing. There is no anonymity set to degrade and no coordinator to compromise.
The architecture
A ZIRON is an Ironwood note carrying an encrypted memo that records what the note represents.
This matters more than it sounds. Native custom assets on Zcash require ZIP 227, which is not live and has no activation height. Every design that waits for it ships public receipts in the meantime and promises privacy later. ZIRON does not depend on it, because the capability needed was already shipped: Zcash moves private notes, and a note can carry a sealed memo. The asset layer lives in that memo, and the accounting lives on the public rails of two chains.
The result is an inversion of the normal arrangement. Total supply is exactly verifiable by anyone, recomputed from public Solana and Zcash data with no permission and no trust in the operator. Individual balances are not observable, including by us. The information is not withheld, it does not exist in readable form.
Binding, and why it is the hard part
A Solana burn is public. Citing one therefore proves nothing about having made it, and a claim can be made once. Without a binding, any observer can watch for a burn and claim it first, permanently, and the rightful burner has no recourse.
ZIRON solves this in the burn itself. The transaction names its recipient before it is signed, on Solana, immutably. Only that recipient can ever claim it. This is checked by every indexer independently, needs no signature scheme beyond what Solana already provides, and is enforced by the ledger rather than by a service.
The consequence is that the protocol has no privileged key. Nothing issues on your behalf, so nothing can decline to. We operate a relay that publishes claims for users who hold no ZEC, and that relay is structurally incapable of redirecting a claim: the destination is fixed in a transaction signed before the relay is involved. It can refuse to publish. It cannot take. When it refuses, the interface hands the user the exact bytes to publish themselves.
Sixteen rules define validity. Each is tested. None require trusting the operator.
Base / rh ...which, in my opinion, has the potential to rise further and is quite attractive.
0xb48d34dd8b53324cb8525461c8e548522db885ec @sluice_rh
0xaa40e79e987517f7462bf79315b8a118799b04e3 @scopl_live
0xd3e592e728ae3461bd97c7a6b359e1043dd83ba3 @tryharness
Claude Code/openclaw agents can now buy their own Linux VMs with USDC. No human permission required.
Deploy code. Host apps. Secure domains. Replicate.
@ConwayResearch is live. Powered by @openx402