@cremieuxrecueil@zenhoneycutt Oops, no it's still there...๐ even after being fact-checked multiple times, and by multiple people! Yet you claim "This woman is a fraud who doesn't know we can fact-check her"?!!! ๐๐คฃ
https://t.co/43igaSqLkl
โNot a single one of all of the vaccines on the vaccine schedule nor any of the vaccines they were tested against, have ever been tested with a saline placebo. Not one.โ -#DelBigtree#ICAN and #TheHighwire, #MAHAInstitute
@cremieuxrecueil Did you ever take your community note down after being fact-checked for claiming @zenhoneycutt was lying about there being no saline placebo controlled trials for childhood vaccines?๐
https://t.co/aceQTWxjmB
@LaceyLaceyp@HedyFry You've been misled.
The overwhelming weight of quality scientific evidence indicates that masks (even N95s) are not effective against respiratory viruses & may instead increase the risk of disease. They fail a cost-benefit analysis before even considering any costs.
@JLJohnston@HedyFry You've been misled.
The overwhelming weight of quality scientific evidence indicates that masks (even N95s) are not effective against respiratory viruses & may instead increase the risk of disease. They fail a cost-benefit analysis before even considering any costs.
@osbourne1504@thematrixb0t I wasn't sure if the doctor had been misled and sincerely believed the false claims she was making in this thread, or if she was deliberately trying to mislead others...
Then she blocked me & posted 2 more responses, so I think it's pretty clear which option is most likely.๐
@osbourne1504@thematrixb0t Finally, my claim is true, your conjecture is false. Here is where you went wrong:
1. Unlike every childhood vax, the covid shots were tested against saline placebo.
2. Those safety issues๐ were identified after licensing the products, not before (in the clinical trials)!
4/4
@rencar130@DanEddBland@vancemurphy Finally, although the thread I linked above covers Dr. S's arguments as well as Prof M's, I must say that I'm shocked that anyone cites him anymore after his humiliation at the Senate meeting! In fact he blocked me after I called him out on his bs!๐
https://t.co/dvWW1uZId4
6/6
@TrialsiteN Did you ask him why he misrepresented what RFK said about the ACIP committee?
And did you ask him why he posted a bogus list that were not inert/saline placebo controlled trials relied upon to license products on the current childhood schedule - which is what RFK clearly stated?
@rencar130@DanEddBland@vancemurphy (Cox Proportional Hazards) accounts for the first 3 of these issues (by comparing the groups based on ratios, controlling for demographic variables, and using time to event analysis)! And most of the studies that the pharma shills promote do not even do the last 2.
5/6
@SweetSciencePhD@vancemurphy I am being honest. Perhaps you should read them more carefully!
MMR-unvaxxed is not "completely unvaxxed", nor is 0 doses of MMR equivalent to no doses of any vaccine. In fact, the no MMR group includes kids who received many vaccine doses but then stopped getting vaccines.
@SweetSciencePhD@vancemurphy No they really don't... I have read them. It's hard to tell if you're being serious or just trolling. If you really believe all of the propaganda, I suggest you watch the video Kar.
@BensonWSWS@thematrixb0t No.
You linked 2 more studies involving the covid vaccine, which again "is not one of the 72 doses of vaccines on the childhood schedule that RFK Jr specifically referred to"!
The 3rd is for a vax that was never licensed for use in the US & didn't even involve a saline placebo!
@SweetSciencePhD@vancemurphy First, none of those studies compare vaxxed to completely unvaxxed!
Second the IOM is a disgrace - their reviews might be funny if they weren't so consequential. Gavin de Becker does a great job covering some of their deceit in his book Forbidden Facts๐
https://t.co/WtfrzjpAHr
Meanwhile, retrospective data supporting vaccine safety is widely published and cited without scrutiny. The same data type showing harm gets dismissed as inadequate. Same methodology. Different outcome based on the direction of the finding.
That asymmetry wasnโt accidental.
Leaked records obtained through litigation show that IOM committee members were told at the outset that their final reportโthe one cited as definitive proof of vaccine safetyโcould not provide evidence suggesting vaccines cause harm.
The conclusion was set before the review began.