@PaganMinNP Same ethno-linguistic group (Eastern Pahadi) but different tribe. Chhetri are Khas tribe and Bahuns are either sub-tribe of Kanyakubja or early split Vedic Brahmin based on genetics
@gs_shekhawatt Only Brahmins tho.
Most tension between Bahuns & Gangetics is with Madheshi who are usually Yadav (Goala) and Muslim who are genetically far from us
And we can phenotypically distinguish them from us
People don't know how to run G25 distances properly.
Sample size, sample quality, atypical & outlier profiles being averaged in, etc can all change the outcomes. Here's the distances with only HW sim averages which have higher sampling & less skew to sample quality
This guy's lying. There's no "one family" set which has any sort of shift.
There are 50+ Bahun samples on HarappaWorld which average 34% S-Indian with a range of 30-36% S-Indian. 20+ Gangetic Brahmins whose average is 40-41% S-Indian with 37-45% range
https://t.co/mqsbgO32an
@lifeisPandC@negi_frm_hills@Unbiased2737 It’s not “some” there is only one guy his family, One guy doesn’t mean anything he’s basically Rajasthani B + East Asian
majority fall within the
Bhumihar + East Asian range
Remember, cherry-picking a Rajasthan Jodhpur Rajput sample can make us way diff same with them.
@gs_shekhawatt@lifeisPandC@negi_frm_hills Who are u referring to by one guy and his family? There is no such family set. You are making things up
There are 50+ Bahun samples on HarappaWorld which average 34% S-Indian whereas 20+ Gangetic Brahmin samples and they average 40-41% S-Indian
https://t.co/mqsbgO32an
@_Nrptanya_@gs_shekhawatt@negi_frm_hills That Punjabi brahmin and Rajasthani Brahmin "average" is literally a single sample. Single sample distances are farther
Stop scamming bruh. Here's against individual samples. I'm just using more samples than u
@gs_shekhawatt@lifeisPandC@negi_frm_hills Sure but Gangetic Brahmins themselves are migrants from Vedic core of Kuru Panchala not native Gangetic
Also we’re not close to Gangetic Rajus. They are between us and South Indian Brahmins but closer to the latter