2Legs

Planet Earth: You. Are. A. Crew (NASA astronaut Christina Koch)

[2Legs @Uncle2Legs]

@chadwahl @JackPrescottX Can you touch a bit on air gapped deployments in that demo / video?

That must be a very common problem in many industries and not only the obvious one...

[2Legs @Uncle2Legs]

@Johanne69715410 @philipengberg About 90% of us are not living in Copenhagen 🤣

[2Legs @Uncle2Legs]

@PalanTesla @arny_trezzi Yes. A lot of ifs, but also doable and it's been done before.

[2Legs @Uncle2Legs]

@sudoingX Yes.

I just setup gitea this weekend.

It's a lot like github.
Local runners and container registry built in.
Build workflows are very close to GH dittos.

Can mirror a GH repos (2 way), so I'm doing that until my off site backup is solid.

SSL with Traefik on tailscale network.

[2Legs @Uncle2Legs]

@SayNoToTrading @amitisinvesting $SCAM would be more fitting

[2Legs @Uncle2Legs]

@plainionist Using speckit I've written into my constitution that SpecFlow specs (GWT's) for acceptance tests, normal unit tests and full integration tests if I run in docker with 100% greens is mandatory.

This + the speckit workflow makes it hard for the LLM to take off to la-la-land.

[2Legs @Uncle2Legs]

@plainionist It depends.

If you anchor it with analysis, specs, 3 levels of tests (as normal) etc you can have very good results.

If you just vibe code everything, beyond some complexity and/or maintenence threshold, you'll be in big trouble with the amount of slop it can make in no time.

[2Legs @Uncle2Legs]

@mikaockerman @Rainmaker1973 @grok It was a lengthy and healthy discussion, and I'm character limited, but even for him the case is pretty clear.

God was written out of the natural sciences long ago.

But God may be since that possibility hasn't been disproved - or proved for that matter. Scientifically 😊

[2Legs @Uncle2Legs]

@mikaockerman @Rainmaker1973 @grok Talked to him.

"Modern science" dates back to 11-1200 or so. Hardened later to formalize the rigor we know and continue to build on.

Ancient *valid* science is the ancestor to modern science. Since science is nature, the learnings cummulates through our species entire history.

[2Legs @Uncle2Legs]

@blairchris @heygurisingh Yeah.

Here's a good ancient article on the subject.

What pisses me off is that Spotify *promised* lossless during covid and delivered - fucking podcasts and a middle finger to audio quality.

Crap company.

https://t.co/yNOCWObapv

[2Legs @Uncle2Legs]

@larsloekke @TomTomKrus Husk lige en reform af avancebeskatning, som i dag fungerer helt utroligt dumt, idet man selv ved nødvendig rebalancering af et åbent depot bliver beskattet selvom pengene forbliver i investeringsmiljøet.

Kunne de ikke blot være i fred derinde op til en grænse på fx 25 mio?

[2Legs @Uncle2Legs]

@TokeLorenzen @jochen_abi @SorenSchifter Galning

[2Legs @Uncle2Legs]

@JUST_KAWS You forgot to explain your $300 target though.

[2Legs @Uncle2Legs]

@JackPrescottX Yeah, but those multiples only work if macro doesn't go psycho at some point before the revenue can catch up.

Long term hodler here 😊

[2Legs @Uncle2Legs]

@Dr_Crossroads LLM providers:

- Can they replicate PLTRs value offerings? Probably.
- Can they penetrate PLTRs market? Probably - for many verticals and they potentially get access to unique training data...
- Would they orchestrate other models? Sure.

Why isn't this a threat?

(I own PLTR)

[2Legs @Uncle2Legs]

Når man tillader sig at mene noget som går imod et sølle snowflake, så bliver man blokeret.

Det går jeg ikke i stykker af.

Men jøsses mand...

Du har sgu allerede ret til ikke at bruge de redskaber, der bliver efterspurgt.

Men du får ikke en beskyttelse mod konkurrence.

[2Legs @Uncle2Legs]

@StorgaardMikkel Niks.

Hvis du mener at du er bedre stillet uden LLM tech, så er det lige fint for mig. Jeg kunne ikke være mere ligeglad.

Men at du ligefrem vil have en ret på det her område er vildt nok.

Du har jo en konkurrencefordel uden den her tech, så intet problem for dig.

[2Legs @Uncle2Legs]

@StorgaardMikkel Niks.

Hvis du mener at du er bedre stillet uden LLM tech, så er det lige fint for mig. Jeg kunne ikke være mere ligeglad.

Men at du ligefrem vil have en ret på det her område er vildt nok.

Du har jo en konkurrencefordel uden den her tech, så intet problem for dig.

[2Legs @Uncle2Legs]

@StorgaardMikkel Hvorfor er det vigtigt?

Det er præcist den samme diskussion.

Spørgsmålet er om du vil bruge de værktøjer som findes eller ej.

Du siger det skal være en ret at man ikke vil bruge LLM tech fordi deskilling.

Det synes jeg er noget vrøvl - men det skal bruges rigtigt.

Ven.

[2Legs @Uncle2Legs]

@StorgaardMikkel Alt var svært, dyrt og langsomt. Alt.

Nu er det nemt, hurtigt, billigt - og potentielt forkert.

Men vælg ethvert emne og du kan gå så dybt som du vil og kan betale for.

Har du selv prøvet at bruge AI strukturet til seriøst arbejde eller hvorfor mener du som du gør?