@DanielM77380264@hull_restore@TheHughAnthony I think both sides pick and choose when to be a textualist. For example, abortion is nowhere in the constitution. I just donโt understand the outrage, itโs just the status quo and has been for quite a long time.
@TheHughAnthony It has been interpreted by the courts the same since its inception. This isnโt something new. Illegal immigrants, while less in quantity in years past, have always had the 14th amendment applied to them.
@DanielM77380264@hull_restore@TheHughAnthony It has been interpreted by the courts the same since its inception. This isnโt something new. Illegal immigrants, while less in quantity in years past, have always had the 14th amendment applied to them.
@NDRepublicans This has been the law of the country since the 14th amendment was passed. SCOTUS decided to keep the status quo so what are you talking about ๐๐
@TbuggL@MattWalshBlog The 14th amendment was drafted by a 15 member committee. There is no โauthorโ lol. Please look up the committee minutes to see that, in fact, they contemplated this precise issue.
@EndWokeness The ruling of SCOTUS is consistent with the view of the 14th amendment since its inception. Your attempts to frame this as some new issue is ridiculous. Everyoneโs a textualist until it cuts against them, then they whine and bitch like a woman.
@xbtDLN The ruling of SCOTUS is consistent with the view of the 14th amendment since its inception. Your attempts to frame this as some new issue is ridiculous. Everyoneโs a textualist until it cuts against them, then they whine and bitch like a woman.
@MattWalshBlog The ruling of SCOTUS is consistent with the view of the 14th amendment since its inception. Your attempts to frame this as some new issue is ridiculous. Everyoneโs a textualist until it cuts against them, then they whine and bitch like a woman.