@talesofduster We're present on several other social media platforms: Instagram, Facebook, Pinterest, and Youtube. Besides, we have national websites and newspapers to fill with news content. We do not need the service Twitter provides, even though it's a shame that Musk has created this mess.
In the wake of Elon Musk's erratic behavior, we have decided to stop using Twitter. Our profile will be visible, but no new content will be added. We encourage all our followers to visit our official website for news and updates. https://t.co/4vzA2WAx00
This is Repressive tolerance. Father of “the new left” Herbert Marcuse coined it 50 years ago.
“Given this situation, I suggested in “Repressive Tolerance“ the practice of discriminating tolerance in an inverse direction, as a means of shifting the balance between Right and Left by restraining the liberty of the Right, thus counteracting the pervasive inequality of freedom (unequal opportunity of access to the of democratic persuasion) and strengthening the oppressed against the oppressors. Tolerance would be restricted with respect to movements of a demonstrably aggressive or destructive character (destructive of the prospects for peace, justice, and freedom for all). Such would also be applied to movements opposing the extension of social legislation to the poor, weak, disabled”
“by virtue of its inner logic, withdrawal of tolerance from regressive movements, and discriminatory tolerance in favour of progressive tendencies would be tantamount to the “official“ promotion of subversion”
“Liberating tolerance, then, would mean intolerance against movements from the Right, and toleration of movements from the Left. As to the scope of this tolerance and intolerance:... it would extend to the stage of action as well as of discussion and propaganda, of deed as well as of word.”
“a policy of unequal treatment would protect radicalism on the Left against that on the Right”
“To discuss tolerance in such a society means to re-examine the issue of violence and the traditional distinction between violent and nonviolent action. The discussion should not, from the beginning, be clouded by ideologies which serve the perpetuation of violence. Even in the advanced centers of civilization, violence actually prevails (…) In terms of historical function there is a differance between revolutionary and reactionary violence, between violence practiced by the oppressed and by the oppressors. In terms of ethics, both forms of violence are inhuman and evil - but' since when is history made in accordance with ethical standards?”
The fact that 50% of the mothers of such children have borderline personality disorder?
The fact that the explosion of such cases is clearly and unarguably a psychogenic epidemic?
The fact that GID is highly and inextricably comorbid with depression and anxiety?
The fact that perhaps the majority of adult so-called GID cases are autigynephilic males?
We're living in a dystopian sci-fi movie where machines have already begun replacing human interaction. This is a dangerous development.
Is artificial intelligence a threat to Christianity? https://t.co/BfHWKCbWUJ
Evil acts. Unixploria condemns the invasion and the barbaric acts of war.
Zelenskiy urges world leaders to act over PoW beheading video https://t.co/EkAt5qbqqL
Good news! A new network of charging stations will have to accompany this reform.
EU countries approve ban on sale of petrol, diesel cars from 2035 – @EURACTIV https://t.co/bLRJ5Pacd3
”Powerful AI systems should be developed only once we are confident that their effects will be positive and their risks will be manageable.”
https://t.co/KZrSg63YFS