@goldworks5 Arguably it's not to "get ahead" but just to "try and stay even", as they have appearance, name, possible accent, and possible culture gap to overcome.
@goldworks5 You switched from "lying" & "secrets" to "getting ahead on the corporate ladder".
As if by switching from "Xiaoping" to "Henry" will make him instant CEO. As if people still don't deal with his appearance, personality, and performance.
@goldworks5 We're not talking about split personalities, or fake ones. Xiaoping who likes the color red, white wine, and long walks on the beach doesn't change his name to Peter who hates whine, the color red, and anything beach-related.
@goldworks5 A first name is hardly a "true identity". Nothing is concealed except your original first name. Your surname is still out there, as is every other aspect about you. It has no malicious nor negative impact on anyone.
@goldworks5 And it's not a "fake" name. A fake name implies a sham, not genuine. That would be "Sandy" in my examples.
These people aren't adopting "fake" names. They chose their names to represent themselves in their new environment. There's nothing "fake" about it. It is meant to be them
@goldworks5 Richard would just be for interfacing with the english speaking world, so every fan, reporter, journalist, and peer isn't constantly mispronouncing his name. Which is fine with yao as I've said, different with a name like Qinqin or Xiaoqing or Ziyi
@goldworks5 @TheThuum1 @nytimes I've not once mentioned my feelings. The only one who's talked about it so far is you. Stick to the discussion yeah?
Are you a straight shooter like this? You never tell a lie? Mr. Truth? Mr. 100% honest? Because if you lie, mister, then our twitter relationship is built on lies