You know what indicates how evolved a society is ...???
Is it's reaction to outrageous things that are "said" versus it's reaction to outrageous things that are "done".
370 Rs Biryani and cadaver dick size jokes are horrible, offensive jokes but they are *jokes* said in the safe space of a comedy club (and that matters to a degree).
But far more instructive is the fact that a society chooses to react 1000x more to these jokes than to
- Brij Bhushan Singh
- Manipur horror
- Prajwal Revanna.
- marital rape
- and a million other far more dangerous, offensive things.
There is a reason India is a radioactive VishwaGutter.
We are a shit society, with shit values, inherited from a shit religion.
And all internet has done is make us worse, rather than better (something that should be researched).
@CatchMeAbhiOrb Disappointed by Flipkart Minutes. Received a damaged item with the damage deliberately covered by a price sticker. I flagged it 2 days later when i actually saw it, but their knee-jerk reaction was to deny a refund, which I hadn't even asked for! Never shopped there again. 🚫
I don’t call that Justice. He lost 6 months of Freedom which is his Constitutional right.
Why wasn’t the investigation fast tracked? Considering, there was no culpability and therefore no evidence.
Delhi HC should also penalise ED for playing this dirty political game.
Leaving aside the politics of @BJP4India and @INCIndia, the case of Meenakshi Natarajan represents a complete travesty of justice and fair play by the entire system, cutting across all pillars of democracy.
✅ The Returning Officer rejected her nomination in blatant violation of Section 33A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, read with Section 210 & 223 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
✅ On 11.06.2026, despite fervent pleas made by @DrAMSinghvi, @ECISVEEP sat on the judgment, and the Supreme Court declined to intervene even for a day till proper hearing. With no interim order by the Apex Court or the ECI, the Returning Officer declared the result!
✅ The matter was heard by the Supreme Court this forenoon. However, without examining the apparent illegality in the Returning Officer's order, the petition was dismissed in terms of the attached order on the ground that Article 329 bars judicial intervention after the declaration of results and that only an Election Petition can now be filed.
✅ While the fate of the case was effectively sealed when the Supreme Court declined to stay the declaration of the result, it was surprising to hear a legal luminary of Mr. Mukul Rohatgi's stature argue that the description of an entry in Form 26 overrides Section 33A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951!!
✅ Let me attempt to demonstrate why that contention is untenable. Form 26 was prescribed under Rule 4A of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961, which themselves derive their authority from the Representation of the People Act, 1951. Yet it was implicitly argued that Entry 5(ii) of Form 26 overrides Section 33A of the parent statute!!
✅ Moreover, even after Section 33A and Rule 4A were introduced in August–September 2002, @SpokespersonECI, through its letter dated 10.09.2012, categorically clarified that Entry 5(ii) covers only those cases in which cognizance has been taken by a competent court. That condition was clearly not applicable in the case of @MNatarajanINC.
✅ Appearing virtually from London, Mr. Rohatgi argument, that a candidate's right to contest elections is merely a statutory right and not afundamental right, may hold relevance in normal circumstances. However, this was no ordinary case. By adopting a perverse interpretation of Section 33A, the Returning Officer descended to the nadir of partisan conduct and effectively denied the candidate the equal protection of the law guaranteed under Article 14 of the Constitution. In this case, Section 210 read with 223 of BNSS makes it conclusively fall beyond the purview of Entry 5(ii) of Form 26.
I would be happy to be corrected by anyone looking at facts and laws objectively. I am sure that @sardesairajdeep@_YogendraYadav@KapilSibal@adrspeaks@Mukul_Rohatgi@harishsalvee et al will appreciate that, by not intervening in time, #GyaneshKumar led ECI and the top court just let the case shift from Article 32 to Article 329 and the Returning Officer hide under it.
Tomorrow if Modi Ji were to literally shoot an innocent Indian,
Bagree will ask, why did he come in the way of the bullet ...!!!
Bhai, paltu kutta ho to Bagree jaise, warna paltu kutta na ho...!!!
As an experiment, I wrote a 450‑word piece on a topic without doing any research or using references (to preserve originality of thought and writing). Two AI detectors still flagged it as significantly AI‑generated.
Not to boast, but if you write above average, your work can easily be marked as AI‑generated simply because it appears too perfect to be human. The rhythm and structure that detectors interpret as AI are often just the color and play of language that a lot of us try to bring to our writing.
Essentially, some humans write well (and use em/en dashes all the time!)... AI detection is just as prone to error as AI generation.
According to the NITI Aayog's Report of the Expert Committee on the Roadmap for Ethanol Blending in India 2020-25, producing 1 litre of ethanol from sugarcane requires approximately 2,860 litresof water.
This finding was deleted from the report.
Important: So @ECISVEEP stays ‘silent’, doesn’t respond to Cong demand to reconsider Meenakshi Natarajan nomination for Rajya Sabha from MP when all the available evidence suggests that prima facie this was hardly a case which required a nomination rejection. At the very least, one would have expected clarity from a top constitutional body. Meanwhile, all 3 BJP candidates declared unopposed. Matter will now be heard in SC only tomorrow and expect ‘tareek pe tareek’ and a prolonged hearing. Yet another nail in the coffin of an institution one looked upto as a neutral umpire. 🙏
@Pothi@Netajinonsense1 It’s software. It can literally be designed to take care of anything. Including “edge cases” which is where such design needs to be implemented. This is a human error. someone didn’t think about it. Even MSMEs use common sense in these matters
@ksinamdar@amazonIN Age is irrelevant-the person simply didn’t follow the expected procedure. Amazon offers open box delivery for a reason and has due processes in place to prevent exactly this. A mistake clearly happened, but blaming the wrong party won’t fix it.